GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs Group-IB Threat Intelligence comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitGuardian Public Monitoring and Group-IB Threat Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs. Group-IB Threat Intelligence Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"One thing I really like about it is the fact that we can add search words or specific payloads inside the tool, and GitGuardian will look into GitHub and alert us if any of these words is found in a repository... With this capability in the tool, we have good surveillance over our potential blind spots.""The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for."

More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Pros →

"The totality of the recordings is quite important. The networks, the new threat actors, the new methods, tactics, techniques, and procedures.""The most valuable Group-IB Threat Intelligence features are their detections, especially in terms of account and card information leakage. This data sets Group-IB apart from some of the competition.""Threat Intelligence's best feature is threat activation.""We have found the site intelligence features to be the most valuable.""The tool's most valuable feature is the sandbox."

More Group-IB Threat Intelligence Pros →

Cons
"I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems like a compelling approach to lure and identify attackers.""I would like to see improvement in some of the user interface features... When one secret is leaked in multiple files or multiple repositories, it will appear on the dashboard. But when you click on that secret, all the occurrences will appear on the page. It would be better to have one secret per occurrence, directly, so that we don't have to click to get to the list of all the occurrences."

More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Cons →

"Group-IB Threat Intelligence should improve integration for SIEM and SOAR solutions.""Threat Intelligence's OT security could be improved.""The lack of appliance-based or on-premise options for this solution is its biggest downfall. Clients request them often.""As the landscape evolves, they could provide a little more detail or specificity to map it to the MITRE ATT&CK framework.""The web intelligence could be improved. It is not as good as the intelligence from other solutions."

More Group-IB Threat Intelligence Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for."
  • More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Threat Intelligence is costly, but it gives value for money."
  • "Group-IB Threat Intelligence's pricing is reasonable."
  • "The pricing is alright. It's right on the mark."
  • More Group-IB Threat Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for.
    Top Answer:It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for. You get something that is fully managed with a lot of features, and a tool that is very efficient.
    Top Answer:I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems… more »
    Top Answer:We have found the site intelligence features to be the most valuable.
    Top Answer:The dark web intelligence could be improved. It is not as good as the intelligence from other solutions.
    Ranking
    Views
    82
    Comparisons
    33
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,292
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    821
    Comparisons
    449
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    239
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    GitGuardian
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring allows real-time GitHub scanning and alerting to uncover sensitive company information hiding in online repositories. It monitors both organization repositories and developers' personal repositories. The solution gives visibility to developers and security teams on this very critical blindspot that are the organization developers' personal repositories on GitHub (80% of leaked corporate secrets on public GitHub come from developers’ personal repositories).

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring is particularly interesting for companies with large development teams (above 200 developers) and modern development practices.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring cover 350+ API providers, database connection strings, private keys, certificates, usernames and passwords and intellectual property. It uses sophisticated pattern matching techniques to detect credentials that cannot be strictly defined with a distinctive pattern (like unprefixed credentials). The algorithm has a high precision (91% “true positive” feedback following our alerts, as reported by our users.)

    The alerting is done in real-time (a few seconds after the secret was publicly exposed) which allows fast remediation involving in a collaborative way developers, security teams and operations.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring also allows red teams and pentesters to proactively look for sensitive information by performing complex queries on 12 billion documents and metadata from more than 3 years of GitHub history.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring scans public GitHub activity in real-time, helping organizations detect sensitive information leaks in source code repositories. Our solution gives Threat Intelligence and Security teams full visibility over their organization’s public GitHub Attack Surface, by monitoring both organization-owned repositories and developers' personal repositories.

    With 80% of secrets and credentials leaks on public GitHub finding their source in developers' personal repositories, GitGuardian for Public Monitoring helps organizations address a critical security blind spot.

    With real-time incident notification, Threat Intelligence and Security teams are guaranteed to reach the incident scene before everyone else and take action to mitigate the threat of breaches and intrusions.

    Group-IB Threat Intelligence is an extremely potent threat intelligence platform that is trusted by everyone from law enforcement organizations like Interpol to the threat analysts that rely on it. It helps users gain a deep understanding of the threat landscape that they face. Organizations that choose to use Threat Intelligence gain insights into how threat actors think so that they can counter them as effectively as possible.

    Group-IB Threat Intelligence Benefits

    Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Threat Hunting Framework include:

    • Increase efficiency. One of the things that Group-IB kept in mind when they designed Threat Intelligence was that organizations are always looking for ways to improve their digital security. Threat Intelligence does just that by increasing the efficiency of the security operations of businesses that deploy it. Users can automate parts of their security workflows. They can remove potential human error from the equation and at the same time allow resources to be assigned to areas where they are most needed. It can also reduce the number of false alarms that users have to worry about. This enables organizations to focus on events that actually threaten them instead of those that were incorrectly flagged.
    • Adaptability. Threat Intelligence enables users to adapt their security operations so that they can confront any security-based challenge. They can connect and integrate with many of the more popular security solutions to bolster their capabilities if their security needs change. Users are given the flexibility to add other solutions to their security architecture if the situation makes it necessary to do so. They can also use industry-specific intelligence to adjust their security protocols as the industry landscape changes. They can block harmful and malicious activity as soon as their system becomes aware of the issue.
    • Threat tracking. Users of Threat Intelligence are able to track threats across their specific industries or others that interest them. Bad actors who target particular types of businesses can be watched closely by those who would be most harmed by them. This keeps organizations aware of the nature of the threats that threaten them and their partners.

    Group-IB Threat Intelligence Features

    Some of the many features that Group-IB Threat Intelligence offers include:

    • Centralized customizable threat management dashboard. Threat Intelligence offers users the ability to create a centralized threat-tracking dashboard. From this single location, organizations can keep an eye on hackers and other threats. All of the data that could prove relevant to dealing with attacks can be accessed without any hassle.
    • Network traffic analysis. Organizations can leverage a tool that enables them to scan network traffic for threats that might otherwise go unnoticed. They can set it to look for particular patterns, sequences, or commands that might indicate the presence of malware.
    • Graph feature. Threat Intelligence makes it possible for users to upload information relating to various threat actors onto a graph. This represents the relationship between these actors in a visual way that can be easy for decision-makers to understand.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Group-IB Threat Intelligence is a solution that stands out even when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its ability to provide users with automated threat-hunting capabilities and its events and intelligence correlation feature.

    John R., the chief technology officer at Systema Global Solusindo, writes, “The solution allows clients to conduct Automated Threat Hunting which closes the gap between cybersecurity skills in the market and the high requirements of knowledge required to do such analysis.”

    He also says, “The most valuable feature is the automatic correlation of all internal cyber activities with their cyber threat intelligence. Threat Hunting Framework provides real-time correlation on all the cyber events and checks against the Group-IB Threat Intelligence database.”

    Sample Customers
    Align Technology, Automox, Fred Hutch, Instacart, Maven Wave, Mirantis, SafetyCulture, Snowflake, Talend
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs. Group-IB Threat Intelligence
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs. Group-IB Threat Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring is ranked 17th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews while Group-IB Threat Intelligence is ranked 9th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 5 reviews. GitGuardian Public Monitoring is rated 9.0, while Group-IB Threat Intelligence is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of GitGuardian Public Monitoring writes "Helps us prioritize remediation tasks efficiently, improves our overall security visibility, and is effective in detecting and alerting us to security leaks quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Group-IB Threat Intelligence writes "Easy to setup, highly stable and scalable and efficiently tracks threat actors and analyze their tactics". GitGuardian Public Monitoring is most compared with Snyk, whereas Group-IB Threat Intelligence is most compared with Recorded Future, Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services, CrowdStrike Falcon, Mandiant Advantage and Anomali ThreatStream. See our GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs. Group-IB Threat Intelligence report.

    See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.