Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitGuardian Platform vs HCL AppScan comparison

GitGuardian and HCLSoftware are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitGuardian is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.7, while HCLSoftware is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3. GitGuardian holds a 0.8% mindshare in AS, compared to HCLSoftware ’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitGuardian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of HCLSoftware users who would recommend it.
GitGuardian Platform
Read 32 GitGuardian Platform reviews
  • 4,023 Views
  • 2,012 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
HCL AppScan
Read 43 HCL AppScan reviews
  • 4,632 Views
  • 3,381 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 28, 2025

HCL AppScan and GitGuardian Platform are both prominent in the cybersecurity space, focusing on vulnerability detection and incident resolution. GitGuardian seems to have the upper hand due to its real-time secret detection and remediation capabilities, offering a seamless "Dev in the loop" feature, reducing incident resolution time and maintaining low false-positive rates.

Features: HCL AppScan is recognized for detecting XSS and SQL injection vulnerabilities and providing effective scanning for static and dynamic testing. Its AI-powered capabilities enhance security functionality, and the tool offers valuable compliance templates with a notably low false-positive rate. GitGuardian Platform excels in detecting sensitive information leaks like tokens and passwords in real-time. Its efficient internal monitoring features and the "Dev in the loop" feature offer rapid feedback for quick incident resolution, with minimal false positives.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan could improve in detecting DOM-based XSS vulnerabilities and better integration with mobile vulnerability checks. Users desire improved integration with other tools, scalability, and enhanced customer support. GitGuardian Platform could benefit from more detailed reporting features, improved UI usability, and better integration capabilities. Enhancing context-based secret detection and handling encrypted secrets more effectively are also areas for improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan provides extensive deployment options on premises and cloud solutions, with mixed reviews on technical support, especially post-IBM transition, emphasizing the need for quicker response times. GitGuardian Platform offers public and private cloud deployment with responsive technical support. Users find integration straightforward, though some aspects of support require enhancements.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan is deemed expensive but delivers substantial ROI by reducing vulnerabilities and achieving cost savings, competing with solutions like Veracode. GitGuardian Platform is reasonably priced, providing a good balance of functionality and cost-efficiency. Despite not being the cheapest, it offers significant ROI by effectively protecting sensitive data while adhering to budget constraints.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. HCL AppScan Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
GitGuardian Platform vs. HCL AppScan
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
GitGuardian Platform saves time and resources by automating vulnerability detection, reducing costs, and enhancing security efficiency.
Sentiment score
3.2
HCL AppScan enhances architecture with fewer errors and improved security, achieving 50% return and 20% cost savings.
I can certainly say that we have saved significant time and resources in terms of people and automation.
The majority of our incidents for critical detectors and important secret types are remediated automatically or proactively by developers through GitGuardian's notification system, without security team involvement.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitGuardian Platform report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the HCL AppScan report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
GitGuardian's customer service is praised for responsiveness, knowledgeable support, proactive communication, and high user satisfaction ratings.
Sentiment score
6.8
HCL AppScan's support is responsive with mixed reviews, facing regional challenges and lagging behind competitors like Veracode.
It effectively helps us with credentials security and has been performing satisfactorily.
I would rate their technical support a nine out of ten.
I would rate the technical support as excellent.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitGuardian Platform report
Veracode provides excellent assistance and regularly scheduled calls to address customer concerns and updates.
For more quotes and insights, download the HCL AppScan report
KZ
AK
Ney Roman - PeerSpot reviewer
MS
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
GitGuardian Platform scales well across large codebases and integrates seamlessly, praised for responsive monitoring and customizable deployments.
Sentiment score
5.4
HCL AppScan is scalable yet varies by license, integration issues, infrastructure compatibility, and CI/CD pipeline design effectiveness.
In terms of scalability, I would rate it around a ten out of ten, as it handles all the repositories and commit activity we have.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Currently, what GitGuardian Platform is doing works effectively.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitGuardian Platform report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the HCL AppScan report
GM
AK
reviewer2721312 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Users regard GitGuardian as stable and reliable, experiencing minimal downtime and quick resolutions for occasional configuration issues.
Sentiment score
5.0
HCL AppScan is stable and reliable, with minor hardware issues, improved by recent upgrades enhancing performance and stability.
We set up a lot of the repository, so GitGuardian is a required check.
The SaaS platform has experienced two significant moments of downtime or instability in the last six months, requiring notices and retrospectives.
I would rate the stability of the GitGuardian Platform as excellent with no downtimes.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitGuardian Platform report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the HCL AppScan report
GM
AK
Ney Roman - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Room For Improvement

GitGuardian Platform requires customization, better integrations, advanced analytics, improved UI, mobile apps, and enhanced user management for efficiency.
HCL AppScan requires improvements in vulnerability detection, usability, integration, performance, support, pricing, and language/codebase compatibility to stay competitive.
Another thing that would be good to see is some more metrics on the usage of the GitGuardian pre-push hooks.
The self-healing activity by developers isn't reflected in the analytics, requiring us to collect this data ourselves.
We are looking for better metrics and audit data, wanting more features such as knowing which users are creating the most secrets or committing the most secrets, what repository, what directory, and who is not checking in secrets.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitGuardian Platform report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the HCL AppScan report
GM
AK
reviewer2721312 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

GitGuardian offers value with a free plan for small teams but may be costly for large organizations.
HCL AppScan is considered expensive but cost-effective, with varied pricing opinions influenced by its premium features and discounts.
Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.
It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitGuardian Platform report
Companies often choose based on budget constraints, with Veracode being on the higher end cost-wise.
For more quotes and insights, download the HCL AppScan report
AK
GM
MS
 

Valuable Features

GitGuardian excels in fast, accurate secret detection with seamless integration, low false positives, and efficient remediation features.
HCL AppScan detects vulnerabilities, integrates with agile processes, offers scalability, user-friendly features, and AI-enhanced rapid scanning for security.
One of the best features of the solution is the ability to use pre-push hooks.
A high number of our exposures are remediated by developers before security needs to step in, as the self-healing playbook process engages them automatically.
GitGuardian Platform performs the capability to detect secrets in real time exceptionally, as it activates from the commit and can detect it immediately.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitGuardian Platform report
AppScan's most valuable features include its ability to identify vulnerabilities accurately, provide detailed remediation steps, and the newly introduced AI-powered features that enhance its functionality further.
For more quotes and insights, download the HCL AppScan report
GM
AK
reviewer2721312 - PeerSpot reviewer
MS
 

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform
Ranking in Application Security Tools
8th
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
4th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (6th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (6th), Software Supply Chain Security (4th), DevSecOps (3rd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (4th)
HCL AppScan
Ranking in Application Security Tools
15th
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
15th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HCL AppScan is 2.7%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes
Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.
Read full review
Sthembiso Zondi - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a straightforward setup process and valuable security features
We use AppScan primarily for security testing and performance monitoring across our systems The product's features for comprehensive code analysis (static) and live environment testing (dynamic) have significantly enhanced our ability to identify and address vulnerabilities, improving overall…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
18%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.
See all answers
What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...
See all answers
What do you like most about HCL AppScan?
The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.
See all answers
What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?
AppScan needs to improve its handling of false positives. It also requires enhancements in customer support, similar to what Veracode provides. Regularly scheduling calls with clients to discuss fe...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?
The primary use case for AppScan is for security purposes. I compare AppScan with other tools such as Veracode. We use AppScan for vulnerability detection and auto-remediation of vulnerabilities wi...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitGuardian Platform Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitGuardian Platform
Compared 16% of the time
Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform Logo
Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform
Compared 14% of the time
GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform Logo
GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform
Compared 12% of the time
SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform Logo
SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform Logo
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform
Compared 10% of the time
More GitGuardian Platform Competitors
Acunetix vs HCL AppScan Logo
Acunetix vs HCL AppScan
Compared 12% of the time
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs HCL AppScan Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs HCL AppScan
Compared 12% of the time
Veracode vs HCL AppScan Logo
Veracode vs HCL AppScan
Compared 11% of the time
OWASP Zap vs HCL AppScan Logo
OWASP Zap vs HCL AppScan
Compared 7% of the time
Checkmarx One vs HCL AppScan Logo
Checkmarx One vs HCL AppScan
Compared 7% of the time
More HCL AppScan Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
GitGuardian Platform
August 2025
GitGuardian Platform reportDownload GitGuardian Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
HCL AppScan
August 2025
HCL AppScan reportDownload HCL AppScan product report
 

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring
IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
 

Overview

GitGuardian is an advanced secrets security platform that strengthens Non-Human Identity security and ensures compliance with industry standards by detecting and managing secrets in development environments.

GitGuardian integrates Secrets Security and Secrets Observability, facilitating the detection of compromised secrets and managing legitimate secrets' lifecycle. Supporting over 450 types of secrets, the platform offers public monitoring for leaked data and employs honeytokens as an added defense. Trusted by over 600,000 developers, organizations such as Snowflake and ING rely on GitGuardian for robust secrets protection.

What features define GitGuardian?
  • Internal Monitoring: Tracks confidential data like IDs and tokens.
  • Dev in the Loop: Rapid alerts for leaks.
  • Detection Capabilities: High accuracy with a low false-positive rate.
  • Integrations: Supports seamless integration with multiple platforms.
  • Customized Detectors: Offers tailored security solutions.
  • Multi-Vault Support: Facilitates efficient issue management.
What are the key benefits when evaluating GitGuardian?
  • Comprehensive Detection: Identifies AWS keys and other hardcoded secrets.
  • Efficient Remediation: Swiftly resolves issues.
  • Improved Security: Prevents accidental leaks of sensitive data.
  • Seamless Integration: Compatible with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps.

In sectors like healthcare and telecommunications, GitGuardian is implemented for detecting and managing the exposure of sensitive information in code repositories. Teams benefit from its ability to integrate with platforms such as GitHub, allowing for immediate alerts and efficient remediation of security risks, enhancing application security by safeguarding operational environments.

GitGuardian

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

HCLSoftware
 

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.
Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
Buyer's Guide
GitGuardian Platform vs. HCL AppScan
July 2025
Free Report: GitGuardian Platform vs. HCL AppScan
Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian Platform vs. HCL AppScan and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our GitGuardian Platform vs. HCL AppScan report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.