We performed a comparison between Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series and HPE BladeSystem based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers."The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability."
"Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series has two processors."
"The solution is very fast and the power consumption is great."
"It is easy to scale if you have the licensing."
"For me, the most valuable features are integration and simple defining."
"They are very fast and very reliable. They are working under very tough conditions."
"It is not expensive."
"With just one cable, for redundancy let's say two, you can feed sixteen servers in a single c7000 chassis."
"Uptime and service are valuable for us. When we have an issue, uptime and being able to get an emergency replacement or actual service is the most important thing for us."
"The scalability has been good."
"The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series was complex."
"It can have more automation. In addition, Fujitsu should have a broader portfolio, not specifically in terms of the service solutions, but more in terms of the big picture. A broader portfolio would be nice for providing different solutions for the customers."
"The response time in terms of getting technical support assistance could be improved."
"I would like to see the upgrade path a little bit smoother."
"Some part of virtual connections needs improvement."
"They should provide open learning materials and seminars for detailed knowledge of the product."
"This product needs a wider range of firmware compatibility matrix from the oldest to the newest blade server."
"The problem is that when want to expand with a new chassis, you have to do everything manually. It's not automatic."
"The servers are a little bit huge, so it would be great if they could renew the size."
"They could include some embedded software for container technology."
More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is ranked 13th in Blade Servers with 3 reviews while HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 134 reviews. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is rated 8.0, while HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series writes "A highly stable solution with technical support that is not only good but also always available to help the product's users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Very reliable, expands well, and is pretty simple to set up". Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is most compared with Fujitsu CX1000, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE Synergy, whereas HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series, Dell PowerEdge M, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE Superdome X.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
