Frends vs webMethods.io comparison

Frends Enterprise iPaaS and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Frends Enterprise iPaaS is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.7, while IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0. Frends Enterprise iPaaS holds a 0.2% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frends Enterprise iPaaS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Frends

Read 3 Frends reviews

275 Views
270 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

9,371 Views
2,624 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Frends

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

webMethods.io and Frends compete in the integration platform solutions category, each offering distinct advantages based on user preferences and business needs. Feedback indicates that webMethods.io generally excels in pricing and support satisfaction, while Frends is valued for its advanced features, appealing to those seeking robust solutions.

Features: webMethods.io offers strong API management, cloud integration capabilities, and is suitable for complex enterprise environments. Frends provides ease of use, efficient process automation, and valuable advanced features. These features position webMethods.io for robust enterprise integrations and Frends for simplicity and efficiency in workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io offers a comprehensive deployment framework that supports broad capabilities, albeit with more complexity. Frends is recognized for its straightforward deployment approach and responsive customer service. Frends attracts businesses seeking hassle-free setup and direct support.

Pricing and ROI: webMethods.io typically involves higher setup costs, potentially justified by its extensive features for larger enterprises. Frends offers a cost-effective solution with quicker ROI due to its user-friendly nature and lower upfront expenses. These pricing and ROI aspects allow businesses to weigh costs against potential benefits in choosing the right platform.

To learn more, read our detailed Frends vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Frends vs. webMethods.io

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frends

Ranking in API Management

23rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), Cloud Data Integration (8th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Frends is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.5%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Kalle Reponen

Senior Integration Architect at Visma

Offers simplicity, ease of customization, and visibility of integrations

One thing is that Frends keep the integration, and that is something I know that it's coming, like, a later version; that is something we will be currently missing. So the end-users could take an interest in use by themselves, with the release thing some result flow. That is the most wanted and requested feature for now. Another enhancement includes the monitoring part. It would be nice to have some sort of maybe mobile app on which we can see how integrations are running if there are some problems, and getting those alerts on the mobile would be really nice.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product has valuable features for version control."

"One of the benefits is the speed of creating something new. Second, it's replacing the old integration quite fast. Then it is like the visibility of the integration and the possibility to see what is happening in the integration."

"The user-friendly interface for constructing integration solutions is also a notable benefit."

"The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging."

"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is its reliability. It has a lot of great documentation from the service providers. Additionally, it is easy to use."

"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."

"The orchestration aspects of APIs, the integration capabilities, and the logging functionalities were the most critical features of our workflow."

"I like the tool's scalability."

"webMethods API Portal is overall very valuable. It is now a comprehensive API catalogue that serves various purposes, including API assessment and evaluation."

"The product is powerful, straightforward, and easy to use."

"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"One of the primary areas for improvement is a more mobile-friendly interface for the control center."

"Another enhancement includes the monitoring part. It would be nice to have some sort of maybe mobile app on which we can see how integrations are running if there are some problems, and getting those alerts on the mobile would be really nice."

"It is a new application and lacks some essential features compared to competitors."

"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."

"The Software AG Designer could be more memory-efficient or CPU-efficient so that we can use it with middle-spec hardware."

"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."

"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."

"The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so."

"I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."

"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."

"Prices should be reduced, ideally by up to 30% for long-term customers like us."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Recent changes in their pricing have removed this benefit, moving towards process-specific pricing."

"The pricing is quite fair."

"There are no hidden costs in addition to the standard licensing fees for webMethods. For corporate organizations, it's a very cheap or fairly priced product, but for growing or small businesses, it's quite expensive. These businesses would probably need to consider an enterprise services bus at some point. Thus, from a pricing point, it closes out non-cooperate businesses."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

"Some who consider this solution often avoid it due to its high price."

"I am not involved in the licensing side of things."

"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."

"webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them."

"There is a license needed to use the webMethods Integration Server."

"The pricing is a yearly license."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

56%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Frends?

The product has valuable features for version control.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Frends?

The pricing is quite fair. It is quite low compared to competitors, especially when you consider that Frends is a US-based company. So, it's almost cheap compared to them. But, we have an unlimited...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Frends?

It is a new application and lacks some essential features compared to competitors. Basic features like reading and editing into Excel file format could be included.

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Frends

Compared 61% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Frends

Compared 39% of the time

More Frends Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

July 2025

Download Frends product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

July 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Frends is a versatile integration platform tailored for streamlined business operations, facilitating seamless automation and connectivity across systems. It effectively addresses integration challenges, providing a reliable foundation for efficient data flow and process enhancement.

Built to cater to complex business environments, Frends offers a comprehensive suite of integration solutions. Users appreciate its capability to simplify integration processes, leveraging robust tools and functionalities that enhance connectivity and automation. This adaptability makes it a preferred choice for enterprises aiming to boost efficiency in data management and workflow automation. Users value its easy-to-use yet powerful features that help bridge various IT systems and improve operational performance. Frends provides meaningful insights into data interactions, fostering informed decision-making and enabling strategic business growth.

What are the key features of Frends?

Intuitive Workflow Designer: Simplifies the creation and management of complex workflows through a user-friendly interface.
API Management: Offers comprehensive tools for designing, deploying, and monitoring APIs efficiently.
Scalability: Ensures the ability to grow with business needs by efficiently handling increasing data volumes.
Security: Provides robust security features to protect data and ensure compliance with industry standards.

What should users look for in terms of benefits and ROI?

Improved Efficiency: Automates processes reducing manual intervention and increasing productivity.
Reduced Costs: Streamlines operations to save resources and reduce operational expenses.
Enhanced Flexibility: Adapts to changing business environments and requirements smoothly.
Increased Data Accuracy: Ensures seamless data flow, enhancing the reliability and accuracy of business information.

In specific industries, Frends is implemented to address distinct challenges in sectors such as healthcare, finance, and logistics. In healthcare, it automates patient data management, enabling efficient record handling. Finance sectors utilize Frends for secure data exchange and compliance, while logistics firms leverage it for optimizing supply chain operations and enhancing tracking capabilities.

Frends Enterprise iPaaS

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Frends vs. webMethods.io

July 2025

Free Report: Frends vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Frends vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frends vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.