Frends vs webMethods.io comparison

Frends Enterprise iPaaS and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Frends Enterprise iPaaS is ranked #40, while IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.7. Frends Enterprise iPaaS holds a 0.4% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frends Enterprise iPaaS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Frends

Read 3 Frends reviews

360 Views
356 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 94 webMethods.io reviews

8,762 Views
2,541 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Frends

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

webMethods.io and Frends compete in the integration platform solutions category, each offering distinct advantages based on user preferences and business needs. Feedback indicates that webMethods.io generally excels in pricing and support satisfaction, while Frends is valued for its advanced features, appealing to those seeking robust solutions.

Features: webMethods.io offers strong API management, cloud integration capabilities, and is suitable for complex enterprise environments. Frends provides ease of use, efficient process automation, and valuable advanced features. These features position webMethods.io for robust enterprise integrations and Frends for simplicity and efficiency in workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io offers a comprehensive deployment framework that supports broad capabilities, albeit with more complexity. Frends is recognized for its straightforward deployment approach and responsive customer service. Frends attracts businesses seeking hassle-free setup and direct support.

Pricing and ROI: webMethods.io typically involves higher setup costs, potentially justified by its extensive features for larger enterprises. Frends offers a cost-effective solution with quicker ROI due to its user-friendly nature and lower upfront expenses. These pricing and ROI aspects allow businesses to weigh costs against potential benefits in choosing the right platform.

To learn more, read our detailed Frends vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Frends vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frends

Ranking in API Management

40th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), Cloud Data Integration (8th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Frends is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.5%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	2.5%
Frends	0.4%
Other	97.1%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Kalle Reponen

Senior Integration Architect at Visma

Offers simplicity, ease of customization, and visibility of integrations

One thing is that Frends keep the integration, and that is something I know that it's coming, like, a later version; that is something we will be currently missing. So the end-users could take an interest in use by themselves, with the release thing some result flow. That is the most wanted and requested feature for now. Another enhancement includes the monitoring part. It would be nice to have some sort of maybe mobile app on which we can see how integrations are running if there are some problems, and getting those alerts on the mobile would be really nice.

Read full review

Yashraj Makwana

Developer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Offers strong integration capabilities and reliable features but needs pricing and scaling improvements

Many things are evolving with the AI buzz in the market. What I would like to see improved or enhanced in webMethods.io in the future is that since webMethods.io is already under IBM, I think IBM will introduce and integrate AI into it. Additionally, regarding what webMethods.io can improve is the license cost. Other cloud players are also providing the same kind of functionality, such as AWS and Azure. webMethods.io is being installed on-premises, but AWS is providing it directly in the cloud. When comparing the license cost and request per minute cost, webMethods.io needs to address that. There are many competitors in the market for this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the benefits is the speed of creating something new. Second, it's replacing the old integration quite fast. Then it is like the visibility of the integration and the possibility to see what is happening in the integration."

"The user-friendly interface for constructing integration solutions is also a notable benefit."

"The product has valuable features for version control."

"How simple it is to create new solutions."

"It is good for communicating between the systems and for publishing and subscribing. We can easily retrieve data. It is good in terms of troubleshooting and other things."

"A product with good API and EDI components."

"We have found the pricing of the solution to be fair."

"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."

"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."

"One of the most important features is that it gives you the possibility to do low-level integration. It provides a lot of features out of the box, and over the years, it has matured so much that any problem that is there in the market can be solved with this product. We can meet any requirements through customizations, transformations, or the logic that needs to be put in. Some of the other products struggle in this aspect. They cannot do things in a certain way, or they have a product limitation, whereas, with webMethods, I have never faced this kind of problem."

"From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"One of the primary areas for improvement is a more mobile-friendly interface for the control center."

"Another enhancement includes the monitoring part. It would be nice to have some sort of maybe mobile app on which we can see how integrations are running if there are some problems, and getting those alerts on the mobile would be really nice."

"It is a new application and lacks some essential features compared to competitors."

"The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that."

"They should develop clear visibility for the onboarding."

"It could be more user-friendly."

"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."

"The improvement needed is related to the model's position. As of now, it seems to be more of a conceptual idea rather than a widely implemented solution. For how long"

"The solution should include REST API calls."

"With performance, there is room for improvement in regards to if we would like to put another extra layer of security on it, such as SSL. This is affecting their performance quite significantly. They need to improve the process of managing the SSL and other things inside their solutions, so there will not be quite such a significant impact to the performance."

"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is quite fair."

"Recent changes in their pricing have removed this benefit, moving towards process-specific pricing."

"Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."

"I am not involved in the licensing side of things."

"The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing."

"I do think webMethods is coming under increasing pressure when it comes to their price-to-feature value proposition. It's probably the single biggest strategic risk they have. They're very expensive in their industry. They've been raising the price recently, especially when compared with their competitors."

"Initialy good pricing and good, if it comes to Enterprise license agreements."

"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

"webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them."

"The solution's development license is free for three to six months. We have to pay for other things."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Frends

Compared 46% of the time

Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs Frends

Compared 29% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Frends

Compared 25% of the time

More Frends Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

January 2026

Download Frends product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

January 2026

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Frends is a versatile integration platform tailored for streamlined business operations, facilitating seamless automation and connectivity across systems. It effectively addresses integration challenges, providing a reliable foundation for efficient data flow and process enhancement.

Built to cater to complex business environments, Frends offers a comprehensive suite of integration solutions. Users appreciate its capability to simplify integration processes, leveraging robust tools and functionalities that enhance connectivity and automation. This adaptability makes it a preferred choice for enterprises aiming to boost efficiency in data management and workflow automation. Users value its easy-to-use yet powerful features that help bridge various IT systems and improve operational performance. Frends provides meaningful insights into data interactions, fostering informed decision-making and enabling strategic business growth.

What are the key features of Frends?

Intuitive Workflow Designer: Simplifies the creation and management of complex workflows through a user-friendly interface.
API Management: Offers comprehensive tools for designing, deploying, and monitoring APIs efficiently.
Scalability: Ensures the ability to grow with business needs by efficiently handling increasing data volumes.
Security: Provides robust security features to protect data and ensure compliance with industry standards.

What should users look for in terms of benefits and ROI?

Improved Efficiency: Automates processes reducing manual intervention and increasing productivity.
Reduced Costs: Streamlines operations to save resources and reduce operational expenses.
Enhanced Flexibility: Adapts to changing business environments and requirements smoothly.
Increased Data Accuracy: Ensures seamless data flow, enhancing the reliability and accuracy of business information.

In specific industries, Frends is implemented to address distinct challenges in sectors such as healthcare, finance, and logistics. In healthcare, it automates patient data management, enabling efficient record handling. Finance sectors utilize Frends for secure data exchange and compliance, while logistics firms leverage it for optimizing supply chain operations and enhancing tracking capabilities.

Frends Enterprise iPaaS

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Frends vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Free Report: Frends vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Frends vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frends vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.