Frends vs webMethods.io comparison

Frends Enterprise iPaaS and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Frends Enterprise iPaaS is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.7, while IBM is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.9. Frends Enterprise iPaaS holds a 0.3% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frends Enterprise iPaaS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Frends

Read 3 Frends reviews

285 Views
279 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

8,870 Views
2,484 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Frends

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

webMethods.io and Frends compete in the integration platform solutions category, each offering distinct advantages based on user preferences and business needs. Feedback indicates that webMethods.io generally excels in pricing and support satisfaction, while Frends is valued for its advanced features, appealing to those seeking robust solutions.

Features: webMethods.io offers strong API management, cloud integration capabilities, and is suitable for complex enterprise environments. Frends provides ease of use, efficient process automation, and valuable advanced features. These features position webMethods.io for robust enterprise integrations and Frends for simplicity and efficiency in workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io offers a comprehensive deployment framework that supports broad capabilities, albeit with more complexity. Frends is recognized for its straightforward deployment approach and responsive customer service. Frends attracts businesses seeking hassle-free setup and direct support.

Pricing and ROI: webMethods.io typically involves higher setup costs, potentially justified by its extensive features for larger enterprises. Frends offers a cost-effective solution with quicker ROI due to its user-friendly nature and lower upfront expenses. These pricing and ROI aspects allow businesses to weigh costs against potential benefits in choosing the right platform.

To learn more, read our detailed Frends vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Frends vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frends

Ranking in API Management

23rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (11th), Cloud Data Integration (10th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Frends is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.6%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	2.6%
Frends	0.3%
Other	97.1%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Kalle Reponen

Senior Integration Architect at Visma

Offers simplicity, ease of customization, and visibility of integrations

One thing is that Frends keep the integration, and that is something I know that it's coming, like, a later version; that is something we will be currently missing. So the end-users could take an interest in use by themselves, with the release thing some result flow. That is the most wanted and requested feature for now. Another enhancement includes the monitoring part. It would be nice to have some sort of maybe mobile app on which we can see how integrations are running if there are some problems, and getting those alerts on the mobile would be really nice.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product has valuable features for version control."

"The user-friendly interface for constructing integration solutions is also a notable benefit."

"One of the benefits is the speed of creating something new. Second, it's replacing the old integration quite fast. Then it is like the visibility of the integration and the possibility to see what is happening in the integration."

"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."

"Ease of implementation and flexibility to hold the business logic are the most valuable features."

"The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging."

"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."

"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."

"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."

"We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces."

"The most valuable feature of webMethods Integration Server is all the capabilities it provides. We leverage most of the features, that they have offered to us. Our vendor has made some additional features on top of the webMethods Integration Server and we use all the features together."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"One of the primary areas for improvement is a more mobile-friendly interface for the control center."

"Another enhancement includes the monitoring part. It would be nice to have some sort of maybe mobile app on which we can see how integrations are running if there are some problems, and getting those alerts on the mobile would be really nice."

"It is a new application and lacks some essential features compared to competitors."

"The Software AG Designer could be more memory-efficient or CPU-efficient so that we can use it with middle-spec hardware."

"When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods."

"We'd like for them to open up to a more cloud-based solution that could offer more flexibility and maybe a better rules engine or more integration with rules engines."

"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."

"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"There are things that could be improved with the webMethods API gateway. One thing is that it's too attached to the integration service and we'd like it to be a little bit more independent. We would like for them to separate operations so that it doesn't rely on the bulky integration server and so that it can be used everywhere."

"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."

"I would like to see the price improve."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is quite fair."

"Recent changes in their pricing have removed this benefit, moving towards process-specific pricing."

"Its cost depends on the use cases."

"I don’t have much idea about prices, but webMethods API Portal is not something cheaper."

"Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client."

"The product is expensive."

"The price of webMethods Integration Server isn't that high from an enterprise context, but open-source ESB solutions will always be the cheapest."

"I would like to see better pricing for the license."

"Initialy good pricing and good, if it comes to Enterprise license agreements."

"The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

59%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	63

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Frends?

The product has valuable features for version control.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Frends?

The pricing is quite fair. It is quite low compared to competitors, especially when you consider that Frends is a US-based company. So, it's almost cheap compared to them. But, we have an unlimited...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Frends?

It is a new application and lacks some essential features compared to competitors. Basic features like reading and editing into Excel file format could be included.

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Frends

Compared 100% of the time

More Frends Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

October 2025

Download Frends product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

September 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Frends is a versatile integration platform tailored for streamlined business operations, facilitating seamless automation and connectivity across systems. It effectively addresses integration challenges, providing a reliable foundation for efficient data flow and process enhancement.

Built to cater to complex business environments, Frends offers a comprehensive suite of integration solutions. Users appreciate its capability to simplify integration processes, leveraging robust tools and functionalities that enhance connectivity and automation. This adaptability makes it a preferred choice for enterprises aiming to boost efficiency in data management and workflow automation. Users value its easy-to-use yet powerful features that help bridge various IT systems and improve operational performance. Frends provides meaningful insights into data interactions, fostering informed decision-making and enabling strategic business growth.

What are the key features of Frends?

Intuitive Workflow Designer: Simplifies the creation and management of complex workflows through a user-friendly interface.
API Management: Offers comprehensive tools for designing, deploying, and monitoring APIs efficiently.
Scalability: Ensures the ability to grow with business needs by efficiently handling increasing data volumes.
Security: Provides robust security features to protect data and ensure compliance with industry standards.

What should users look for in terms of benefits and ROI?

Improved Efficiency: Automates processes reducing manual intervention and increasing productivity.
Reduced Costs: Streamlines operations to save resources and reduce operational expenses.
Enhanced Flexibility: Adapts to changing business environments and requirements smoothly.
Increased Data Accuracy: Ensures seamless data flow, enhancing the reliability and accuracy of business information.

In specific industries, Frends is implemented to address distinct challenges in sectors such as healthcare, finance, and logistics. In healthcare, it automates patient data management, enabling efficient record handling. Finance sectors utilize Frends for secure data exchange and compliance, while logistics firms leverage it for optimizing supply chain operations and enhancing tracking capabilities.

Frends Enterprise iPaaS

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Frends vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Free Report: Frends vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Frends vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frends vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.