Panasas ActiveStor and FreeNAS are competing products in the network-attached storage market. FreeNAS seems to have an advantage, especially considering its rich feature set and cost-effectiveness, making it an attractive option despite ActiveStor's strong support.
Features: Panasas ActiveStor offers high-performance scalable storage solutions, robust data protection, and reliability. It is designed for demanding data environments. FreeNAS is known for its exceptional flexibility and versatility, supporting a wide range of applications with its open-source nature. FreeNAS is preferred for its customization capabilities and broad application support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Panasas ActiveStor is known for its straightforward deployment and strong customer support, providing a fully integrated hardware and software solution. FreeNAS, on the other hand, offers flexibility with its open-source nature but can be more challenging to deploy without technical expertise. ActiveStor provides a more streamlined deployment process with excellent support, while FreeNAS requires more hands-on setup but offers more control and customization for tech-savvy users.
Pricing and ROI: Panasas ActiveStor involves a higher initial setup cost, reflective of its enterprise-grade features and support, promising long-term ROI in high-demand environments. FreeNAS, being open-source, presents minimal initial costs and provides a high ROI through low expenses and versatile usage scenarios. While the upfront cost of ActiveStor is significant, it ensures robust performance and support, making it suitable for large enterprises. In contrast, FreeNAS offers a cost-effective solution with substantial ROI, especially for smaller organizations or those valuing adaptability.
In our most recent product, the ActiveStor Ultra, Panasas has developed a new approach called Dynamic Data Acceleration Technology. It uses a carefully balanced set of HDDs, SATA SSD, NVMe SSD, NVDIMM, and DRAM to provide a combination of excellent performance and low cost per terabyte.
• HDDs will provide high bandwidth data storage if they are never asked to store anything small and only asked to do large sequential transfers. Therefore, we only store large Component Objects on our low-cost HDDs.
• SATA SSDs provide cost-effective and highbandwidth storage as a result of not having any seek times, so that’s where we keep our small Component Objects.
• NVMe SSDs are built for very low latency accesses, so we store all our metadata in a database and keep that database on an NVMe SSD. Metadata accesses are very sensitive to latency, whether it is POSIX metadata for the files being stored or metadata for the internal operations of the OSD.
• An NVDIMM (a storage class memory device) is the lowest latency type of persistent storage device available, and we use one to store our transaction logs: user data and metadata being written by the application to the OSD, plus our internal metadata. That allows PanFS to provide very low latency commits back to the application.
• We use the DRAM in each OSD as an extremely low latency cache of the most recently read or written data and metadata.
To gain the most benefit from the SATA SSD’s performance, we try to keep the SATA SSD about 80% full. If it falls below that, we will (transparently and in the background) pick the smallest Component Objects in the HDD pool and move them to the SSD until it is about 80% full. If the SSD is too full, we will move the largest Component Objects on the SSD to the HDD pool. Every ActiveStor Ultra Storage Node performs this optimization independently and continuously. It’s easy for an ActiveStor Ultra to pick which Component Objects to move, it just needs to look in its local NVMe-based database.
We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.