We performed a comparison between FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Twingate, Perimeter 81 and others in ZTNA."User identification and application identification are valuable features."
"The most valuable feature of FortiGate Next Generation Firewall is its SD-WAN."
"Fortinet offers comprehensive security solutions for various purposes."
"Overall, I am satisfied with the product."
"I found the upgrades valuable."
"The FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall is always updating. For example, if there is a big attack, they fix it in their firmware. They release new firmware with the necessary patches to address the vulnerabilities."
"The setup is easy."
"FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) 's most valuable features are reporting and filtering."
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"The inability to change passwords when using FortiGate firewall and relying on a local FortiGate database for account creation can be problematic, particularly in non-Active Directory setups."
"Its technical support could be better."
"The vendors offer models with different levels of productivity of the product to its users, which is not possible in FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW). It lacks integration options."
"Technical support is not helpful."
"There are some issues with security features and aspects like logs not being up to the mark."
"The pricing of the solution is expensive, so it could be cheaper."
"I see room to explore its integration with Secure Service Automation for a more comprehensive security view."
"The solution's stability should be improved because it is extremely unstable."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
More FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) is ranked 5th in ZTNA with 37 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 20th in ZTNA. FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) is rated 8.4, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) writes "Easy to set up but needs better pricing and more helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) is most compared with OPNsense, Netgate pfSense, Tailscale, Fortinet FortiGate and Twingate, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with .
See our list of best ZTNA vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.