Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortify Software Security Center vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing comparison

The compared Fortify Software Security Center and OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing solutions aren't in the same category. Fortify Software Security Center is ranked #28 in SAST , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 0.4% mindshare in the category. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is ranked #2 in DAST , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 17.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortify Software Security Center users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing users who would recommend it.
Fortify Software Security C...
Read 7 Fortify Software Security Center reviews
  • 590 Views
  • 525 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...
Read 22 OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews
  • 3,330 Views
  • 866 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Fortify Software Security Center and OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: August 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
August 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,299 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Software Security C...
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (28th)
OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Fortify Software Security Center is designed for Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and holds a mindshare of 0.4%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, on the other hand, focuses on Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), holds 17.9% mindshare, down 22.0% since last year.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Fortify Software Security Center0.4%
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)20.3%
Checkmarx One9.9%
Other69.4%
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing17.9%
HCL AppScan14.3%
Checkmarx One13.5%
Other54.3%
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Jonathan Steyn - PeerSpot reviewer
Comprehensive vulnerability analysis and customization features with decent pricing
Software Security Center is highly customizable and helps me test all vulnerability data against the latest conventions like OWASP Top Ten, CVE Top twenty-five, and several other legal compliances. WebInspect supports a number of APIs and web endpoints. I find its feature of macro recording allows for testing vulnerabilities during multi-factor authentication sessions very valuable. I appreciate the ability to further analyze data with tools like Audit Workbench.
Read full review
Navin N - PeerSpot reviewer
Effective scanning of diverse file extensions with fast reporting and issue resolution
We develop software packages for clients, and these clients are mostly in the BFSI sector. The packages need to be scanned, and we engage Fortify WebInspect for this.  Customers typically perform their own application pen tests, but in some cases, we have engagements where customers want us to scan…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Fortify Analytics' AI function helps scan and provides more detailed explanations and recommendations about vulnerabilities."
"Software Security Center is highly customizable and helps me test all vulnerability data against the latest conventions like OWASP Top Ten, CVE Top twenty-five, and several other legal compliances."
"The overall rating for this tool is ten out of ten."
"You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them."
"I like the explanation of issues provided by Fortify Software Security Center."
"This is a stable solution at the end of the day."
"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to make our customers more secure."
"The solution's technical support was very helpful."
"The tool provides comprehensive vulnerability assessments which help ensure our deliverables are as free from vulnerabilities as possible. It has also streamlined our web application vulnerability assessments, assisting us in delivering secure applications to our clients."
"The feature that has been most influential in identifying vulnerabilities is its ability to crawl the website, understand the structure, and analyze the network packets sent and received."
"Good at scanning and finding vulnerabilities."
"The user interface is ok and it is very simple to use."
"Guided Scan option allows us to easily scan and share reports."
"It is easy to use, and its reporting is fairly simple."
More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros
 

Cons

"This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users."
"Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful."
"I am not satisfied with the percentage of false positives, which is around eighteen percent."
"Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."
"The product's overlap feature is restrictive and requires more customization efforts, which can be expensive."
"We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved."
"Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."
"Fortify WebInspect could improve user-friendliness. Additionally, it is very bulky to use."
"I want to enhance automation. Currently, Fortify WebInspect can scan and find vulnerabilities, but users with specific skills need to interpret the results and understand how to address them."
"A localized version, for example, in Korean would be a big improvement to this solution."
"Not sufficiently compatible with some of our systems."
"It took us between eight and ten hours to scan an entire site, which is somewhat slow and something that I think can be improved."
"The installation could be a bit easier. Usually it's simple to use, but the installation is painful and a bit laborious and complex."
"One thing I would like to see them introduce is a cloud-based platform."
"There are some file extensions, like .SER, that Fortify WebInspect doesn't scan."
More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."
"The solution is priced fair."
"As a Fortify partner company providing technical support, I find the product expensive in our country, where local, inexpensive products are available."
"This solution is very expensive."
"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."
"It’s a fair price for the solution."
"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."
"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."
"The price is okay."
"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,299 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Government
15%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise15
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Software Security Center?
In the beginning, it was difficult for me to verify that our usage of Fortify Software Security Center corresponded to the license and criteria. Now, we have negotiated a number of details to respe...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Software Security Center?
I would like the false positive issue to diminish. I have experienced a lot of false positives, but I think this is due to using an older version. I hope the new version will resolve my problem.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Software Security Center?
They use it to scan applications and fix bugs, which are my customers' main use cases for Fortify Software Security Center. As a reseller, I sell this product to provide application security becaus...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?
While I am not directly involved with licensing, I can share that our project's license for 1-9 applications costs between $15,000 to $19,000. In comparison, Burp Suite costs approximately $500 to ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?
WebInspect works efficiently with Java-based or .NET based applications. However, it struggles with Salesforce applications, where it requires approximately 20-24 hours to crawl and audit but produ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Fortify WebInspect?
I am currently working with several tools. For Fortify, I use SCA and WebInspect. Apart from that, I use Burp Suite from PortSwigger. For API testing, I use Postman with Burp Suite or WebInspect fo...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

OpenText Core Application Security vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs Fortify Software Security Center
Compared 44% of the time
Acunetix vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Acunetix vs Fortify Software Security Center
Compared 31% of the time
Semgrep vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Semgrep vs Fortify Software Security Center
Compared 13% of the time
GitLab vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
GitLab vs Fortify Software Security Center
Compared 12% of the time
More Fortify Software Security Center Competitors
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 17% of the time
OWASP Zap vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
OWASP Zap vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 11% of the time
Veracode vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
Veracode vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 8% of the time
Qualys Web Application Scanning vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
Qualys Web Application Scanning vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 8% of the time
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 8% of the time
More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
August 2025
Fortify Software Security Center reportDownload Fortify Software Security Center product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
August 2025
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reportDownload OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect
Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect
 

Overview

Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.
OpenText

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?
  • Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
  • Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
  • Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
  • Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
  • Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.
What benefits should users expect from reviews?
  • Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
  • Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
  • Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
  • Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon
Aaron's
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
August 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: August 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,299 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.