FME vs Talend Data Management Platform comparison

Safe Software and Talend are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Safe Software is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.5, while Talend is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.8. Safe Software holds a 1.8% mindshare in DI, compared to Talend’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Safe Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Talend users who would recommend it.

FME

Read 7 FME reviews

2,778 Views
2,167 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Talend Data Management Plat...

Read 21 Talend Data Management Platform reviews

1,953 Views
1,504 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

FME

Talend Data Management Plat...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Talend Data Management Platform and FME compete in the data integration and management category. Talend has an edge in pricing and support, while FME's advanced features make it attractive for those needing robust functionality.

Features: Talend Data Management Platform provides comprehensive ETL capabilities, open-source flexibility, and strong data governance tools. It offers a wide array of connectors, which is beneficial for easy data integration. FME is known for its specialized support for spatial data integration, offering vast support for various file formats and advanced data transformation capabilities. FME's graphical user interface makes it easy to debug and optimize processes efficiently.

Room for Improvement: Talend could enhance its user interface for more intuitive usability and streamline its cloud deployment options. Talend's scalability might also benefit from further optimization. FME could extend its capabilities in handling non-spatial data to broaden its applicability. Additionally, improving FME's integration with third-party tools and clarifying its pricing model can provide more client transparency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Talend offers straightforward deployment with robust support infrastructure backed by its large user community and comprehensive documentation. FME provides a simple deployment approach, with its dedicated service model offering a more tailored support experience, ensuring clients can customize assistance based on their needs.

Pricing and ROI: Talend Data Management Platform has flexible pricing schemes with lower initial setup costs, allowing faster ROI for less complex deployments. FME, although potentially higher in initial investment, offers a greater ROI for complex transformations due to its comprehensive feature set, making it valuable in feature-rich environments.

To learn more, read our detailed FME vs. Talend Data Management Platform Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. Talend Data Management Platform

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FME

Ranking in Data Integration

23rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Talend Data Management Plat...

Ranking in Data Integration

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of FME is 1.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Talend Data Management Platform is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Alan Bloor

Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector

Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high

When I do coding, I think about every single function. Some of these functions can be very elementary, like doing a substring or some capitalization. But FME removes all that coding because it's a transformer, so the time to develop an application to get to a point where you're producing results is decreased massively. It used to take weeks and months to develop software, and now I can use something like FME, and within one day, we get results. We can look at and validate data. We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

Read full review

Jason Hale

Enterprise Architect at Waikato Regional Council

Comprehensive documentation and smooth collaboration have transformed our development process

There are always areas for improvement. They have actually in the last 12 months done a lot of work on the UI. If you had contacted me at Christmas last year, the UI was really dated. Now, they have not finished cleaning it up or bringing it into a new flash version. But because it has such a simple design, it is actually so easy to use. They have taken a lot of the complexity out of it, so you just click on a button and it does it all for you. I think one weakness, which I might have worked around today, is spatial data. But that might change by Monday. That is again because there is so much functionality, actually the real weakness is they have got too much functionality, if that is a weakness. Because there are 10 ways to do everything, and each way has its own pros and cons, and you really have to make your decision about which way to implement it. When you have five developers or three developers doing something, it is very easy for three people to do the same thing three different ways. On the flip side, that is one of its amazing strengths, as you are not locked into a very rigid way of doing something. It means that a lot of our custom environments are fantastic because we can just plug it in a slightly different way. But because it does so much, it is a lot to get your head around the whole thing. We tend to focus on the small stuff that we are adding value to right now.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."

"From my reseller perspective, the best features in FME are the ease of operation and the fact that it works."

"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."

"FME is spatially aware and understands how to deal with the conversion of spatial objects and their attributes."

"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."

"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."

"The most valuable feature is integration."

"The process of upgrading the software is quite easy."

"I like everything about this product, but the biggest thing is the ease of use."

"The solution can run on any machine and that is a big advantage."

"The basic tools are easy to pick up and understand."

"The most valuable features of the Talend Data Management Platform are the components."

"I think Talend is one of the easiest tools for faster implementation compared to other tools."

"The most valuable feature is the data loading and scripting language"

More Talend Data Management Platform pros

Cons

"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."

"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."

"We are looking at the possibility of using Glue instead of FME, using the native AWS product."

"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."

"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."

"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

"Once you get past the basic tools, it gets pretty complicated."

"The sales and market department could improve the Talend Data Management Platform."

"We'd like to see more connectors it the future."

"The stability is good, but the performance is slower when I work on a huge amount of data."

"I've had some issues with bugs causing crashes, especially when making changes to the system or with the monthly upgrades to Studio they've introduced."

"The biggest challenge with Talend was its performance."

"I'd be interested in seeing the running of Python programs and transformations from within the studio itself."

"The product must enhance the data quality."

More Talend Data Management Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."

"The product's price is reasonable."

"FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."

"The licensing cost is about 40,000 Euros a year."

"The price is on a per-user basis. It's a little more expensive than other tools. There aren't any additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"License renewal is on a yearly basis."

"The tool is cheap."

"The price of the Talend Data Management Platform is reasonable. The other competing solutions are priced high. Gartner Magic Quadrant identified other solutions, such as Informatica, that are far more expensive."

"The solution's pricing is very reasonable and half the cost of Informatica."

"The pricing is a little higher than what I had expected, but it's comparable with I-PASS competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

31%

Energy/Utilities Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FME?

We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FME?

The pricing is really bad. Last year, they rebranded the whole pricing structure. It used to be moderately priced at about £400 per user per year. Now they've changed the whole thing, and it's expe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FME?

The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point. There must be a technical or comm...

See all answers

What do you like most about Talend Data Management Platform?

We can develop our own code if we do not see the functionality we need.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Talend Data Management Platform?

Talend was an open-source tool, so there were no fees associated with it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Talend Data Management Platform?

I understand this might relate more to another platform, like the cloud API cloud platform. Nevertheless, data management could also encompass APIs and real-time streaming data integration. I wonde...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Data Factory vs FME

Compared 24% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs FME

Compared 12% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs FME

Compared 9% of the time

SSIS vs FME

Compared 8% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs FME

Compared 7% of the time

More FME Competitors

Collibra Catalog vs Talend Data Management Platform

Compared 14% of the time

SAP Data Services vs Talend Data Management Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs Talend Data Management Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs Talend Data Management Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Talend Data Management Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Talend Data Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FME

August 2025

Download FME product report

Buyer's Guide

Talend Data Management Platform

July 2025

Download Talend Data Management Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Talend Integration Suite

Overview

FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.

Safe Software

Talend offers robust data integration in an open and scalable architecture to maximize its value to your business. Simple, graphical tools and wizards get you up and running quickly with native code generation that streamlines development.

Talend

Sample Customers

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System

Accent Group, Acticall, Allianz Global Investors Distributors LLC, Car & Boat Media, Cdiscount.com

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. Talend Data Management Platform

August 2025

Free Report: FME vs. Talend Data Management Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about FME vs. Talend Data Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FME vs. Talend Data Management Platform report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.