FME vs Oracle GoldenGate comparison

Safe Software and Oracle are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Safe Software is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.1. Safe Software holds a 1.3% mindshare in DI, compared to Oracle’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Safe Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

FME

Read 7 FME reviews

2,569 Views
2,004 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle GoldenGate

Read 52 Oracle GoldenGate reviews

5,501 Views
3,631 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

FME

Oracle GoldenGate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

FME and Oracle GoldenGate are competing products in the data integration and replication domains. FME stands out with its data transformation capabilities, while Oracle GoldenGate is superior in real-time data replication for specific enterprise needs.

Features: FME features a user-friendly graphical interface, eliminating the need for extensive coding and enabling efficient debugging. It offers exceptional spatial data transformation ability and integrates smoothly with various data sources. Oracle GoldenGate supports real-time data transformations and seamless replication across heterogeneous databases. It efficiently manages data migration even in complex environments and provides robust change data capture capabilities.

Room for Improvement: FME could enhance its deployment efficiency to compete with Oracle-specific integration capabilities. Further development in reducing the initial setup complexity would benefit FME users. Documentation for advanced features might need to be expanded. Oracle GoldenGate's microservices could be simplified for easier management. Its compatibility with non-Oracle environments could be improved further. The learning curve for exploring all features might be steep for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FME offers a flexible deployment model adaptable to various environments, supported by a strong customer service team. However, its initial setup is more complex compared to Oracle GoldenGate, which is praised for seamless integration within Oracle ecosystems and comprehensive support services with ample documentation.

Pricing and ROI: FME provides a cost-effective solution for moderate integration needs, ensuring quick ROI through its transformation abilities. Oracle GoldenGate demands higher initial investment but guarantees strong ROI for enterprises requiring advanced real-time processing, justified by its superior data integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed FME vs. Oracle GoldenGate Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. Oracle GoldenGate

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,425 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FME

Ranking in Data Integration

26th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle GoldenGate

Ranking in Data Integration

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of FME is 1.3%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle GoldenGate is 1.8%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle GoldenGate	1.8%
FME	1.3%
Other	96.9%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Gert Booysen

Software Solutions Leader at GE Vernova

Extensive format support and reliable integration enhance data management while new pricing model requires reassessment

I haven't had any input or requirements from any customers that are not currently covered, so I don't have any additional needs that were identified or raised to me. Regarding pricing, with the model changes that they've implemented a while back, it actually made it more expensive to use, especially on the server side. They changed the licensing model, and that made customers think it is overpriced. Some customers were actually looking at alternatives. Pricing with the model changes was perceived negatively. I work primarily with enterprise customers, Vodacom, Eskom, so it's tier-one customers. For small customers, this solution is a bit too expensive. They don't really use it and just do direct integration on smaller implementations. This is basically used by tier-one customers. FME is still able to save time and money for clients. It's still a good investment. Regarding similar products to FME, GE developed a product called Data Fabric. That is a real-time operational integration platform, Data Fabric Network Connect, which is a GE Grid OS product. It is actually more expensive than FME, but the purpose is different as it's operational. The vendor in this case is GE, and it's a company that we bought that used to be called Greenbird. In current use scenarios, FME is still leading compared to Data Fabric. The GE product has a different application.

Read full review

EmmanuelCatalano

DBA at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Real-time data streaming has simplified transformations and kept enterprise databases synchronized

Oracle GoldenGate is good, but I would like to improve it. There is a need for whoever installs and configures Oracle GoldenGate to set the correct parameters for the use cases we need to use. In some cases, we had performance problems related to the streaming because there was a lot of information to stream concurrently. However, you can tune Oracle GoldenGate to use more RAM on the source side or more processes. I think that sometimes what is missing is knowledge about the tool from the person responsible for configuration. At this moment, Oracle GoldenGate is a very good tool, and I do not know in which area we can improve it. Perhaps the debug part of the tool could be improved. In some cases, I use the utility for how Oracle GoldenGate generates messages about the statements that it streams because of bugs, and in some cases, it is not very user-friendly. It may be possible to improve the API or the path related to debugging, but not the tool itself. The tool itself is good. I remember that in some configurations, we had problems with the streaming of DDL, which are changes to Oracle object structures such as tables and procedures. A new feature could be to perform streaming for operational objects such as procedures, functions, packages, or grants. This would synchronize source and target for these aspects, not only for data or the main types of structures, but also for others. I remember that there was some configuration in which you performed the streaming of the entire schema, or if you performed streaming for only tables, then you were unable to stream grants and other Oracle objects. I think it is important to introduce that capability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"FME is spatially aware and understands how to deal with the conversion of spatial objects and their attributes."

"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."

"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."

"From my reseller perspective, the best features in FME are the ease of operation and the fact that it works."

"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."

"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."

"The product is reliable for data integrity."

"The CDC feature is interesting."

"What I have found the most valuable about GoldenGate is that it does real-time and no-downtime migrations. Its migrations are fast. There are not many tools like it on the marketplace."

"Since the world is going towards open source, the solution's heterogeneous data migration feature is very useful."

"The most valuable feature of Oracle GoldenGate is its ability to sync data in real-time, which is crucial for me."

"Oracle GoldenGate is beneficial for data replication and ensures secure data transport."

"They've recently improved the ease of implementation."

"The product's microservice architecture is scalable."

More Oracle GoldenGate pros

Cons

"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."

"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."

"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."

"We are looking at the possibility of using Glue instead of FME, using the native AWS product."

"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."

"We struggle with memory. It's limited. However, it may be because of our unique business case and how we use it that it's limiting for us."

"The solution sometimes has issues with long transactions and replication delays. Its pricing needs improvement."

"The solution is quite costly, and if they could reduce their pricing, it would be more economical to implement."

"The product lacks some features and it's expensive."

"There is room for improvement in Oracle GoldenGate's pricing, which is a bit high."

"The solution's licensing price is very expensive and could be made more competitive."

"The process of transforming the data between two different databases is inefficient and needs to be improved."

"GoldenGate is expensive. It's costly because this solution is unique in our market. The GoldenGate Cloud Service is cheaper than the on-premise solution."

More Oracle GoldenGate cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."

"The product's price is reasonable."

"We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."

"Oracle GoldenGate is a high-priced solution because it follows the core-based pricing model versus the software-based pricing model of other solutions."

"The solution would be costly for a small organization."

"The price of Oracle GoldenGate should be lowered. It is expensive compared to other solutions."

"We have an enterprise license for it. It might be for three years or so. I'm not aware of any additional costs to the standard licensing fee."

"The product is expensive."

"We have purchased corporate licensing to use Oracle GoldenGate."

"The return on investment would make it a worthwhile deal."

"The one feature that I think Oracle could perhaps consider is, at the moment, the Veridata option is an extra cost. Golden Gate is an expensive product. You pay a lot for the best. But not including the Veridata license to prove that everything is working correctly... The big improvement for me would be to have that license built in. That would take it to the next level. That would make it a much better product. You may want to look at buying term licenses if you've just got a single migration to do. In that situation, you might want a term license for perhaps a year to save a lot of money, rather than buying a perpetual license."

More Oracle GoldenGate pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user99375

Database Administrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Mar 31, 2014

Oracle GoldenGate vs. Oracle Active Dataguard

As an Oracle DBA, while working upon high availability of your database you may stumble upon various Oracle strategic capabilities that fall into categories of Oracle Replication. Oracle provides various technologies for replication like GoldenGate, streams, and Active Dataguard. Replication…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

32%

Energy/Utilities Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	30

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with FME?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FME?

The use cases for FME are mainly integration to the GE Smallworld product. GE Smallworld is a GE product, and we are using it to integrate with other third-party products into GE Smallworld and ADM...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering FME?

The overall rating for FME is eight out of ten, and I prefer the feedback to be anonymous. My job title is Senior Solutions Architect.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle GoldenGate?

The product is reliable for data integrity.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle GoldenGate?

The pricing of Oracle GoldenGate depends on the discount we receive from Oracle. If the customer orders a larger quantity, we get a more flexible price. The list price is high, and the price can so...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle GoldenGate?

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Data Factory vs FME

Compared 19% of the time

SSIS vs FME

Compared 12% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs FME

Compared 8% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs FME

Compared 6% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs FME

Compared 6% of the time

More FME Competitors

Qlik Replicate vs Oracle GoldenGate

Compared 12% of the time

Fivetran vs Oracle GoldenGate

Compared 8% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Oracle GoldenGate

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Oracle GoldenGate

Compared 6% of the time

SharePlex vs Oracle GoldenGate

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle GoldenGate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FME

December 2025

Download FME product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle GoldenGate

December 2025

Download Oracle GoldenGate product report

Also Known As

No data available

GoldenGate

Overview

FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.

Safe Software

Oracle GoldenGate is a real-time data integration and database replication solution. It can detect data events and route them across networks at very low latencies and integrates well with 100s of combinations of non-Oracle databases, data stores, and clouds.

Oracle GoldenGate Features

Oracle GoldenGate has many valuable key features, including:

Simple to use web interface
Fast and easy installation or provisioning
Command line access via AdminClient that can run anywhere
RESTful APIs for DevOps
Offers built-in monitoring but also can be easily adapted to roll your own monitoring
APIs are protected by Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) authentication.

Oracle GoldenGate Benefits

Some of the benefits of using Oracle GoldenGate include:

Oracle GoldenGate is deeply integrated with the Oracle Database (logging, redo, backup and recovery layer, security, administration, data guard, data vault, autonomous database etc.).
It is the most stable, performant, and reliable CDC / replication solution for Oracle.
High performance: Oracle GoldenGate is capable of sub-second latency for data movement. featuring low impact capture, routing, transformation, and delivery of transactional data.
GoldenGate is the only CDC / replication tool that keeps pace with new and emerging innovations (security, features, data types, etc) in the core Oracle Database.
The solution supports a wide range of use cases, from conventional OLTP data replication and high availability to data lake ingestion or multi-cloud ingestion, SaaS application replication, and messaging replication.
GoldenGate is the only CDC / replication technology certified for Exadata, Exadata Cloud Service, and Exadata Cloud at Customer.
For fault-tolerance, GoldenGate has its own mechanism to keep track of how much work is completed and how much is pending. This mechanism is independent of any database and ensures, with the help of automatic gap-resolution, that no data loss occurs.
GoldenGate uses its own proprietary format files for keeping the committed data coming from the source database, making it independently functional irrespective of the database in use.
To maintain the performance and consistency, only committed data is sent. Uncommitted data is captured by GoldenGate, but is discarded after receiving a Rollback.
With GoldenGate, data sending is in “near real time,” which reduces the possibility of latency.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Oracle GoldenGate users.

PeerSpot user Steve-J., Cloud Migration Software Consultant - UK & EMEA at 1PLACE, says, "What I have found the most valuable about GoldenGate is that it does real-time and no-downtime migrations. Its migrations are fast. There are not many tools like it on the marketplace."

Pinak S., Senior Manager of System and Database at ESL, mentions, “We like how in GoldenGate the heterogeneous database is supported. Sometimes the client actually needs a schedule and needs to ensure the state of databases for reporting purposes. With that in mind, we have been able to configure GoldenGate for certain schema. The solution is quite stable. They've recently improved the ease of implementation.”

A Database Administrator at a manufacturing company explains, "It moves the data as you set it up, and it works. I am also very impressed with its stability and scalability. It is not super feature-rich, but the new releases have more functionality. It recently had more native integrations with Oracle Database. If you are using it against an Oracle database, it has a lot more functionality."

An Oracle ERP DBA Consultant - Oracle Super Cluster T5-8 Admin at a government comments, "GoldenGate can connect and collect data from multiple sources, such as SQL Server."

Oracle

Sample Customers

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System

Japan Exchange Group, Daewoo E&C, Herbalife, Starwood Hotels & Resorts, Canon, Turk Telekom

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. Oracle GoldenGate

December 2025

Free Report: FME vs. Oracle GoldenGate

Find out what your peers are saying about FME vs. Oracle GoldenGate and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FME vs. Oracle GoldenGate report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.