Flowmon vs Statseeker comparison

Progress Software and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Progress Software is ranked #43 with an average rating of 9.0, while Techniche is ranked #63 with an average rating of 7.0. Progress Software holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

Flowmon

Read 4 Flowmon reviews

1,476 Views
915 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

538 Views
479 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Flowmon

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and Flowmon compete in network monitoring and management. Flowmon has the upper hand with advanced features that justify the investment compared to Statseeker's affordability and support.

Features:Statseeker provides real-time data monitoring, extensive reporting capabilities, and a streamlined solution for network issues. Flowmon offers sophisticated data analysis, threat detection features, and a comprehensive view of network performance.

Room for Improvement:Statseeker could enhance its feature set to offer more advanced analytics and improve its scalability and security options. Flowmon may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, improving cost-effectiveness for smaller organizations, and enhancing user interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Statseeker offers a straightforward deployment model with reliable customer service, making it accessible for diverse IT environments. Flowmon has a more complex deployment, supported by robust customer service teams to assist with setup and troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI:Statseeker's lower initial setup cost appeals to budget-conscious organizations seeking a cost-effective monitoring solution. Flowmon's higher setup cost is offset by its extensive feature set, promising a greater return on investment through enhanced network insights and security capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Flowmon vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Flowmon vs. Statseeker

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Flowmon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

43rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (15th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Flowmon is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Pifu Lin

Senior System Engineer at DYNASAFE TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD.

Quick identification of network issues enhances performance monitoring

We will try to Proof of Concept (POC) to a client in Taiwan. We just use the features for the Network Performance Monitor (NPM) Flowmon is more easy to understand and helps find network issues more quickly. We need this solution to monitor the network performance. We started using it three…

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The artificial intelligence and automatic detection system in Flowmon Solution are perfect for every, type of customer, such as government and commerce."

"It is an open platform, so in terms of integration, we are quite happy. We can integrate it with other SNMP solutions. We can also integrate it with security solutions, such as a SIEM solution."

"The solution is stable."

"Flowmon is more easy to understand and helps find network issues more quickly."

"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."

"The most important for us is how fast this solution is, as well as the granularity that you can get to, such as per-minute statistics."

"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."

"This solution allowed us to track down trouble users."

"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."

"We are now able to easily track where problems are with bandwidth and port errors, rather than having to do a lot of diagnostics."

"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."

"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"If there was better visualization in Flowmon Solution it would be good."

"I do not know the detailed pricing."

"It would be helpful to have more details about the monitoring of the infrastructure. It should have support for SNMP. This is something that is currently not there in the product."

"The licensing price could be better."

"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."

"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."

"There is a little bit of room to improve in the alerting section to give some more options there. It's all I can think of right now off the top of my head."

"I would like to have soft alarming. If an inner-base all of a sudden triggers a threshold, we have to rely on a lot of other tools and then we go into Statseeker to verify it. If Statseeker would confirm it preemptively and trigger it into our network panel, that would be nice."

"That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive."

"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."

"It would be nice if I could easily select individual interfaces."

"Configuration management: In configuration management it would be helpful if it would backup configuration files (running and start-up configuration) for devices. (Not sure if this is already available in the latest version)."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution could be better."

"It works with a permanent license, and then you can pay for the support. For the gold support, you need to pay yearly."

"The licensing fee accrues only once, but that of support is annual."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."

"We now feel the pricing is a good value. Previously we had a just a normal license but now we've got an Enterprise license. Since the Enterprise, it's been a lot better value. We did think it was pretty expensive before, but with the Enterprise license it's almost less than half that price. If you have a number of accounts within the organization that use Statseeker, I would suggest get the Enterprise license."

"We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees."

"When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

I don't understand the price. I am in deployment, so I do not know the detailed pricing.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

We will try to Proof of Concept (POC) to a client in Taiwan. We just use the features for the Network Performance Monitor (NPM).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Flowmon

Compared 15% of the time

Vectra AI vs Flowmon

Compared 9% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Flowmon

Compared 8% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Flowmon

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Flowmon

Compared 8% of the time

More Flowmon Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 48% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 28% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 24% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2025

Download Flowmon product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

July 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

Flowmon Anomaly Detection System

No data available

Overview

Flowmon is a professional tool for effective network troubleshooting, performance monitoring, capacity planning, encrypted traffic analysis and cloud monitoring. Instead of just the red/green infrastructure status, it helps NetOps teams to understand user experience while keeping the amount of data noise and analytical work to a minimum. Flowmon is a part of the Kemp product portfolio.

Progress Software

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

SEGA

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

Flowmon vs. Statseeker

July 2025

Free Report: Flowmon vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about Flowmon vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Flowmon vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.