Flowmon vs Statseeker comparison

Progress Software and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Progress Software is ranked #39 with an average rating of 9.0, while Techniche is ranked #60 with an average rating of 7.0. Progress Software holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

Flowmon

Read 4 Flowmon reviews

900 Views
706 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

416 Views
252 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Flowmon

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and Flowmon compete in network monitoring and management. Flowmon has the upper hand with advanced features that justify the investment compared to Statseeker's affordability and support.

Features:Statseeker provides real-time data monitoring, extensive reporting capabilities, and a streamlined solution for network issues. Flowmon offers sophisticated data analysis, threat detection features, and a comprehensive view of network performance.

Room for Improvement:Statseeker could enhance its feature set to offer more advanced analytics and improve its scalability and security options. Flowmon may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, improving cost-effectiveness for smaller organizations, and enhancing user interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Statseeker offers a straightforward deployment model with reliable customer service, making it accessible for diverse IT environments. Flowmon has a more complex deployment, supported by robust customer service teams to assist with setup and troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI:Statseeker's lower initial setup cost appeals to budget-conscious organizations seeking a cost-effective monitoring solution. Flowmon's higher setup cost is offset by its extensive feature set, promising a greater return on investment through enhanced network insights and security capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Flowmon vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Flowmon vs. Statseeker

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,671 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Flowmon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

39th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (15th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

60th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Flowmon is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Pifu Lin

Senior System Engineer at DYNASAFE TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD.

Quick identification of network issues enhances performance monitoring

We will try to Proof of Concept (POC) to a client in Taiwan. We just use the features for the Network Performance Monitor (NPM) Flowmon is more easy to understand and helps find network issues more quickly. We need this solution to monitor the network performance. We started using it three…

Read full review

Jessie Hackney

Network Engineer at West Virginia Department of Education

Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise

The product has improved our organization by simplifying monitoring and giving real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise. If we notice five devices with latency or errors, I wouldn't know that if I didn't command line into 800 devices and check every day. I can see the status on the dashboard and it just makes it easy to know where the problems are. If we didn't have that capability by using Statseeker, then it would be very complex to monitor. We'd need to have another tool or manually log into every device to try to check things. And this product just does it all for us. That streamlines and improves our workload so that we only need to have two people in our office for the network team. It improves availability. If a circuit goes down texts and email alerts get sent out. So, even if it's in the evening or we're not on premises, we'll know if something's down. We use it all the time because it really helps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is stable."

"The artificial intelligence and automatic detection system in Flowmon Solution are perfect for every, type of customer, such as government and commerce."

"Flowmon is more easy to understand and helps find network issues more quickly."

"It is an open platform, so in terms of integration, we are quite happy. We can integrate it with other SNMP solutions. We can also integrate it with security solutions, such as a SIEM solution."

"This solution allowed us to track down trouble users."

"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."

"The product simplifies monitoring by providing real-time alerts through a GUI dashboard, email and texts."

"We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."

"The most important feature is just the fact that it doesn't aggregate the information up, and I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time."

"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."

"It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor."

"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"If there was better visualization in Flowmon Solution it would be good."

"I do not know the detailed pricing."

"It would be helpful to have more details about the monitoring of the infrastructure. It should have support for SNMP. This is something that is currently not there in the product."

"The licensing price could be better."

"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."

"With Statseeker I'd like to see some flow, i.e. what's tuning-up the network. The trend I like is managing the traffic load by going to the cloud."

"This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."

"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."

"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."

"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."

"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."

"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It works with a permanent license, and then you can pay for the support. For the gold support, you need to pay yearly."

"The price of the solution could be better."

"The licensing fee accrues only once, but that of support is annual."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."

"We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD."

"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Legal Firm

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

University

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

I don't understand the price. I am in deployment, so I do not know the detailed pricing.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

We will try to Proof of Concept (POC) to a client in Taiwan. We just use the features for the Network Performance Monitor (NPM).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Flowmon

Compared 20% of the time

Vectra AI vs Flowmon

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Flowmon

Compared 8% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Flowmon

Compared 7% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Flowmon

Compared 7% of the time

More Flowmon Competitors

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 54% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 46% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download Flowmon product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

April 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

Flowmon Anomaly Detection System

No data available

Overview

Flowmon is a professional tool for effective network troubleshooting, performance monitoring, capacity planning, encrypted traffic analysis and cloud monitoring. Instead of just the red/green infrastructure status, it helps NetOps teams to understand user experience while keeping the amount of data noise and analytical work to a minimum. Flowmon is a part of the Kemp product portfolio.

Progress Software

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

SEGA

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

Flowmon vs. Statseeker

April 2025

Free Report: Flowmon vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about Flowmon vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Flowmon vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.