Flowgear vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

Flowgear and Salesforce are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Flowgear is ranked #23, while Salesforce is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Flowgear holds a 0.3% mindshare in PaaS, compared to Salesforce’s 10.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Flowgear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Flowgear

Read 7 Flowgear reviews

157 Views
41 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 58 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

3,251 Views
2,184 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Flowgear

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Flowgear compete in the API management and integration space. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform seems to have the upper hand in feature breadth and scalability, making it ideal for large organizations, while Flowgear is more user-friendly and cost-effective for small to medium-sized enterprises.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers a robust set of API management tools, supports cloud and on-premise deployments, and provides a vast array of connectors for diverse integrations. It is well-suited for handling complex, large-scale integration projects. Flowgear, though not as extensive, is highly rated for its ease of integration, quick implementation, and user-friendliness, ideal for rapid deployment in smaller enterprises.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform could enhance its technical support, improve documentation, and offer more competitive pricing to appeal to smaller businesses. Flowgear could expand its training materials, improve workspace navigation, and extend advanced deployment features to lower-priced plans to better support SMBs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers flexible deployment options including cloud, hybrid, and on-premise solutions, but its technical support is inconsistent. Flowgear is primarily cloud-oriented and praised for its responsive, client-centric support, offering personalized assistance that outshines many competitors.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is known for its high costs and complex licensing, which can challenge smaller enterprises despite its feature set. Flowgear offers a more affordable and accessible pricing model, delivering significant value in its basic packages, making it a strong candidate for cost-effective integration solutions for small to mid-sized businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Flowgear

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

23rd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th), Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Workload Automation (8th), Cloud Data Integration (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Flowgear is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 10.9%, down from 16.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Yugan Pillay

DevOps Engineer at Astute

A nice interface and good training with helpful data transformation connectors

The data transformation and use of the pre-connectors have been really useful. We are able to clean and convert files before data is ingested into SQL. The workflow allows us to find errors and fix them as well easily. The interface is really nice and easy to learn. The workflow process helps us save time when we need to figure out which part of the workflow is failing. The time spent on fixing issues is reduced drastically. The data transformation connectors are really nice since we are able to work with data in any format. The training material is really good.

Read full review

Vijay Subramanyam

Delivery Head at cblsolutions

Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has increased efficiency and productivity and saved us time and money."

"The no-code visual front end, along with pre-built samples, allows someone with very little technical ability to get an integration up and running."

"Great for data flow."

"Being able to seamlessly make changes to how one can do mapping visually without having to be a seasoned developer is great."

"The Flowgear tool is helping us reduce the manual work that is done."

"Well-managed version control of workflows and the simplicity in promoting workflows through each environment has aided my team in developing workflows for various environments without the risk of losing development work."

"It has improved our integration with our data supplier."

"Initially, we faced challenges managing numerous scheduled jobs and duplicate entries in our SAP system. To address this, we developed a reusable component in Mule that all applications could use to interact with SAP."

"It can scale."

"The community manager is the standout feature of the Mule Anypoint Platform, as it provides a platform to showcase your API to external parties. It is exceptionally user-friendly and enables external parties to easily utilize and consume the APIs."

"Good interface, simple to use and stable."

"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."

"The flexibility has been great overall."

"API management."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

Cons

"The UI could be improved."

"The initial setup was a bit complex as we were new."

"The software itself needs to keep up with the daily demand to service all clients as the need arises."

"We would like to see more learning videos for beginners."

"The product would be nice if it could provide the deployment features in the lower packages."

"Currently, when designing and testing larger workflows, the sessions timeout and re-authentications are frequently required."

"The product needs to improve the self-help tools and samples."

"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."

"From a monitoring point of view, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform can improve on tracking transactions."

"The product does not provide a priority level for the message."

"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."

"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."

"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."

"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."

"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

"The solution has a high price."

"The product comes complete at one set price including support."

"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform really needs to work on its pricing model because it's very complicated."

"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."

"The product is still very expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."

"The licensing is core-based. My customers tell me that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

20%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 18% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear

April 2025

Download Flowgear product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

April 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Overview

Flowgear enables companies of all sizes to increase efficiency and reduce cost by integrating their apps, services, API’s and databases. No coding with 200+ pre-built connectors, reusable workflows and APIs.

Flowgear

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

April 2025

Free Report: Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.