Flowgear vs IBM API Connect comparison

Flowgear and IBM are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Flowgear is ranked #23, while IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5. Flowgear holds a 0.3% mindshare in PaaS, compared to IBM’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Flowgear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Flowgear

Read 7 Flowgear reviews

158 Views
25 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM API Connect

Read 76 IBM API Connect reviews

422 Views
222 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Flowgear

IBM API Connect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

IBM API Connect and Flowgear compete in the API management category. Flowgear tends to have the upper hand in modern features, while IBM API Connect excels in support and pricing.

Features: IBM API Connect is known for robust security, scalability, and integration capabilities. Flowgear is recognized for its ease of use, flexibility, and automation features. Flowgear's feature set is more user-friendly and adaptable to various workflows.

Room for Improvement: IBM API Connect users seek a less complex setup and better documentation. Flowgear users want more advanced reporting tools and integration enhancements. Each product has distinct improvement areas reflecting varied user needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM API Connect has a streamlined deployment process; however, assistance might be necessary. Its customer service is highly rated for responsiveness. Flowgear deployment is straightforward with minimal support needed, but its customer service could improve in response times.

Pricing and ROI: IBM API Connect users like its competitive pricing and notable ROI due to its extensive capabilities. Flowgear's pricing is higher, but the ROI justifies the cost due to efficient performance and advanced features. IBM API Connect is cost-effective, while Flowgear reflects its premium functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Flowgear vs. IBM API Connect Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear vs. IBM API Connect

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Flowgear

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

23rd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM API Connect

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Management (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Flowgear is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM API Connect is 2.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Fulufhelo Sibei

DevOps Engineer at Astute - The Financial Services Exchange

Fast support, good data ingestion, and a nice UI

I am happy with the product. It has solved our business challenges. It is easy to integrate into multiple sources. We did have to use a data transformation tool which would take months to map and transform data that was being dumped into our secure file transfer. Previously, by the time we finished ingesting the data, it was no longer relevant. This has since changed. Therefore, there are no areas needed for improvement.

Read full review

Shanmugasundaram Shanmuganathan

Solutions Architect at Synechron

Offers basic API orchestration and provides robust security and governance features

While Azure API Management offers configurable scalability, IBM API Connect relies on Kubernetes clusters. This might seem manual and require defining cluster instances upfront, but it's completely customizable and not on-the-fly scaling. It's completely custom-driven, not on-the-fly scaling, which some may consider cumbersome. Overall, I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. Almost all applications we've been exposing lately go through this middleware, so it's used extensively. There are around sixty applications directly using it, but six Kubernetes clusters serve those applications. It's heavily used for integration, including system-to-system integration and product integrations. Our usage has been increasing year-on-year based on our needs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Great for data flow."

"The no-code visual front end, along with pre-built samples, allows someone with very little technical ability to get an integration up and running."

"Being able to seamlessly make changes to how one can do mapping visually without having to be a seasoned developer is great."

"The Flowgear tool is helping us reduce the manual work that is done."

"Well-managed version control of workflows and the simplicity in promoting workflows through each environment has aided my team in developing workflows for various environments without the risk of losing development work."

"It has improved our integration with our data supplier."

"The solution has increased efficiency and productivity and saved us time and money."

"The gateway is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"It offers enhanced security features to protect APIs, enforce access control, and secure sensitive data."

"In-built policies and security functions."

"Using API Connect allows us to quickly create proxy APIs and saves time on end-to-end testing, which lets us deliver quickly to clients."

"It acts as a central gateway for both external APIs and underlying systems. It's basically a central middleware for hosting APIs to the internet and consuming APIs from internal systems. It provides central governance for any APIs going outside the network, ensuring security and a common contract for API definitions."

"The support is good and active. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."

"It is quite stable. We've not had any problem. It has made for a good buy because we are finding that other companies that have similar set ups go down maybe once a month."

"API Connect is a good product, and everything works fine. All the analytics are good, and it is easy to follow up. I like it in that sense. I'm more focused on following up on analytics by seeing how many API calls we are getting and where we see a lot of problems. I was working on that API level."

More IBM API Connect pros

Cons

"The product would be nice if it could provide the deployment features in the lower packages."

"We would like to see more learning videos for beginners."

"The initial setup was a bit complex as we were new."

"The UI could be improved."

"The product needs to improve the self-help tools and samples."

"Currently, when designing and testing larger workflows, the sessions timeout and re-authentications are frequently required."

"The software itself needs to keep up with the daily demand to service all clients as the need arises."

"One thing about API Connect that could be improved is the security schemes. There are so many security schemes, and from a product perspective, IBM could improve the user experience of the configuration security scheme."

"The solution is overly complex."

"Understanding the architecture, deployment criteria, and communication methods of the installation can be time-consuming."

"We've had some issues upgrading to the latest version of the solution."

"When comparing API Gateway with DataPower Gateway, several features in DataPower Gateway are absent in the APIC layer. Examples include the lack of connectivity to MQ."

"Business applications could be exposed to users."

"I would like to see automation of the installation. If there could be a single-click function where you could automate everything, that would be helpful."

"The installation was difficult with the IBM toolkit."

More IBM API Connect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price of the solution is very expensive, it can turn many customers away."

"It is a pretty expensive tool."

"API Connect was highly expensive for us, but the decision to switch was made before I joined the company. It seems like the company bought it, but they didn't know how to use it. After two years, they decided to reevaluate and conduct some cost estimates."

"The pricing is too expensive with IBM. Sometimes, we prefer to go with an open source or something more lightweight."

"I haven't seen anyone go from on-premise to the cloud. In fact, I am seeing people go from the cloud to on-premise because the costs can quickly grow on the cloud."

"Pricing for IBM API Connect varies, e.g. it could be subscription-based. Deploying it on private cloud also means you have to own most of the software licensing."

"It should be cheaper. It has a yearly licensing."

"API Connect is expensive - I'd rate their pricing five out of ten."

More IBM API Connect pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

19%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Insurance Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about IBM API Connect?

Publishers can easily identify, create, and publish APIs on the developer portal, defining plans, packages, and potentially billing rules.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM API Connect?

Pricing depends on how many instances run across environments. I don't deal with licensing, but compared to other IBM products, the licensing is not significantly higher.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM API Connect?

When comparing API Gateway with DataPower Gateway, several features in DataPower Gateway are absent in the APIC layer. Examples include the lack of connectivity to MQ ( /categories/message-queue-mq...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 25% of the time

Apigee vs IBM API Connect

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs IBM API Connect

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 7% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs IBM API Connect

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM API Connect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear

June 2025

Download Flowgear product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM API Connect

June 2025

Download IBM API Connect product report

Overview

Flowgear enables companies of all sizes to increase efficiency and reduce cost by integrating their apps, services, API’s and databases. No coding with 200+ pre-built connectors, reusable workflows and APIs.

Flowgear

IBM API Connect facilitates API management and integration in the financial sector. Companies use it to expose, secure, and manage APIs for banking, insurance, and fintech, deploying it on-premises, in the cloud, or as a hybrid solution.

IBM API Connect focuses on creating and monetizing APIs while enabling seamless transactions and integration with third-party services. It is vital for compliance with regulations and enhances external communication among institutions. With deployment options suitable for different environments, it supports centralized gateway management, robust security features, and comprehensive API lifecycle management. Users benefit from powerful analytics, user-friendly interfaces, and high performance with capabilities in message transformation and efficient monitoring.

What are the most important features?

Centralized Gateway: Manages all APIs through a single entry point.
Robust Security: Ensures API protection with advanced security measures.
Comprehensive API Lifecycle Management: Covers creation, deployment, and retirement of APIs.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies API creation and management tasks.
Powerful Analytics: Provides insights into API usage and performance.
Seamless Integration: Connects easily with third-party services and internal systems.
Flexible Deployment Options: Supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.
High Performance: Optimizes API performance and reduces latency.
Message Transformation: Manipulates and formats messages between different systems.
Visualization Tools: Enables clear and detailed views of API usage statistics.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

API Monetization: Generates additional revenue streams from APIs.
Enhanced Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry regulations and standards.
Improved External Communication: Facilitates integration and communication among financial institutions.
Technical Support: Benefit from reliable customer support and easy configuration.
Deployment Flexibility: Choose from on-premises, cloud, or hybrid options.

IBM API Connect is extensively implemented in the financial sector, enabling banking, insurance, and fintech services to manage APIs efficiently. Companies use it to ensure secure transactions, integration with third-party services, and compliance with regulatory standards. Its deployment flexibility accommodates different infrastructure needs, making it suitable for a wide range of financial applications.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Heineken, Tine, Finologee, Axis Bank

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear vs. IBM API Connect

April 2025

Free Report: Flowgear vs. IBM API Connect

Find out what your peers are saying about Flowgear vs. IBM API Connect and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Flowgear vs. IBM API Connect report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.