No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Flowgear vs IBM API Connect comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Flowgear
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
24th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM API Connect
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
API Management (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Flowgear is 1.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM API Connect is 2.3%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM API Connect2.3%
Flowgear1.3%
Other96.4%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2110344 - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead: Solution Developer at Genasys Technologies (Pty) Ltd
Great features, effortless integrations and offers an enhanced experience for users
Some of my current wishlist items for improvements would be to extend the existing timeout setting or have that setting configurable at a user level. Currently, when designing and testing larger workflows, the sessions timeout and re-authentications are frequently required. Also related to the designing and testing of larger and more complex workflows, navigation is sometimes cumbersome. A means of easily navigating and following the various connectors and workflow links would be a welcomed addition.
Mehdi-El Filahi - PeerSpot reviewer
Middleware Tech Lead at MQnovaTool
API management has strengthened security and monitoring but still needs better support and tooling
There are areas of IBM API Connect that need to be improved. I want what Gravitee made, which is much better. Gravitee made many samples for different use cases. First of all, they made examples of use cases, codes, and what the module expects and what the module returns for multiple examples and use cases inside the development. I do not even have to go to the documentation website because everything is included inside the tool when I work on it. This is great, in fact. IBM API Connect should show examples. One other thing is the support. The support of IBM is in India. Every time I want to ask something, they say they need logs, they want this, they want that. Gravitee API asks me to explain the problem without asking a thousand times as if it is a request for a green card in the USA. Then they really explain quickly. IBM is a big company, so everything is standardized with the approach of "You do that, you do that, you request that. If you do not have that, you do not reply to the client." Clients want flexibility today, even if it is a huge company. A stressed client is a client that will want to change to other flexible solutions. When everything is fine, we do not care, but when there is stress and problems, that is when the customer of IBM evaluates the tool really. It is when there are problems. IBM makes a lot of efforts on sales and technical sales, and then that is it.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Well-managed version control of workflows and the simplicity in promoting workflows through each environment has aided my team in developing workflows for various environments without the risk of losing development work."
"Great for data flow."
"The solution has increased efficiency and productivity and saved us time and money."
"The no-code visual front end, along with pre-built samples, allows someone with very little technical ability to get an integration up and running."
"The Flowgear tool is helping us reduce the manual work that is done."
"Being able to seamlessly make changes to how one can do mapping visually without having to be a seasoned developer is great."
"It has improved our integration with our data supplier."
"The solution offers a pretty good SLA."
"We use this solution for rest-based, micro services to complete authentication, gather statistics, audit and throttle traffic, and provide a developer portal that allows users to browse their APIs and develop applications on them, with solid features compared to some of the API services management services out there."
"We belong to the healthcare industry, so it is beneficial to implement the API Connect solution to provide APIs that can integrate outside and inside our organization."
"The solution is very scalable because it's on the cloud."
"We work very closely with IBM on their product and they're very good support, so when we run into issues, they are there to help."
"The management of the API and API portal is good."
"Most of the business value that we are getting out of this solution is that it provides DevOps integration and a catalog for microservices, and we are able to share those APIs instantly within the organization; even if we want to share it outside publicly, then we can have those capabilities."
"The services that I consume through IBM API Connect are beneficial, and it can handle multiple API management."
 

Cons

"The UI could be improved."
"The software itself needs to keep up with the daily demand to service all clients as the need arises."
"The product would be nice if it could provide the deployment features in the lower packages."
"The product needs to improve the self-help tools and samples."
"We would like to see more learning videos for beginners."
"The initial setup was a bit complex as we were new."
"Currently, when designing and testing larger workflows, the sessions timeout and re-authentications are frequently required."
"Stability is not good."
"Improving the documentation would be beneficial as it currently presents navigation challenges. Incorporating a step-by-step guide could facilitate the integration or migration of various systems, including databases. The existing documentation only comprises plain text, hence incorporating more interactive instructions could enhance its usefulness."
"The installation was difficult with the IBM toolkit."
"It is expensive within this class of products."
"There is room for improvement regarding the connectivity of the DevOps."
"The administration of the user interface and the technical documentation are areas of concern in the solution where improvements are required."
"I wouldn't recommend this solution to other organizations at this time."
"The implementation of IBM API Connect is complex, as it's an enterprise solution with many components that require more than one person. It's not a single product that you work on, and this is an area for improvement, but normally, it's good. Having a more structured model for IBM API Connect support is also room for improvement that would help customers better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is a pretty expensive tool."
"API Connect's license cost could be a little lower. But, unfortunately, there aren't many open-source API gateways. Ideally, some new developers could come up with a minimum-functionality open-source solution."
"API Connect was highly expensive for us, but the decision to switch was made before I joined the company. It seems like the company bought it, but they didn't know how to use it. After two years, they decided to reevaluate and conduct some cost estimates."
"I rate the product price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."
"The price of the solution is expensive. However, there are a lot of customization capabilities."
"The pricing is significantly high."
"The price of the solution is very expensive, it can turn many customers away."
"We pay for the IBM API Connect monthly. We only need to pay the standard licensing fee."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
17%
Insurance Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Construction Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Large Enterprise1
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise62
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM API Connect?
I do not handle the pricing, setup cost, and licensing details.
What needs improvement with IBM API Connect?
There are areas of IBM API Connect that need to be improved. I want what Gravitee made, which is much better. Gravitee made many samples for different use cases. First of all, they made examples of...
What is your primary use case for IBM API Connect?
The usual use cases for IBM API Connect that I worked with mostly involved three things: security, monitoring, and message control. The purpose was to address these areas, though there was one feat...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Heineken, Tine, Finologee, Axis Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Flowgear vs. IBM API Connect and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.