Flowgear vs IBM API Connect comparison

Flowgear and IBM are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Flowgear is ranked #23, while IBM is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2. Flowgear holds a 0.3% mindshare in PaaS, compared to IBM’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Flowgear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Flowgear

Read 7 Flowgear reviews

157 Views
41 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM API Connect

Read 76 IBM API Connect reviews

367 Views
299 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Flowgear

IBM API Connect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

IBM API Connect and Flowgear compete in the API management category. Flowgear tends to have the upper hand in modern features, while IBM API Connect excels in support and pricing.

Features: IBM API Connect is known for robust security, scalability, and integration capabilities. Flowgear is recognized for its ease of use, flexibility, and automation features. Flowgear's feature set is more user-friendly and adaptable to various workflows.

Room for Improvement: IBM API Connect users seek a less complex setup and better documentation. Flowgear users want more advanced reporting tools and integration enhancements. Each product has distinct improvement areas reflecting varied user needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM API Connect has a streamlined deployment process; however, assistance might be necessary. Its customer service is highly rated for responsiveness. Flowgear deployment is straightforward with minimal support needed, but its customer service could improve in response times.

Pricing and ROI: IBM API Connect users like its competitive pricing and notable ROI due to its extensive capabilities. Flowgear's pricing is higher, but the ROI justifies the cost due to efficient performance and advanced features. IBM API Connect is cost-effective, while Flowgear reflects its premium functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Flowgear vs. IBM API Connect Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear vs. IBM API Connect

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Flowgear

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

23rd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM API Connect

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Flowgear is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM API Connect is 2.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Yugan Pillay

DevOps Engineer at Astute

A nice interface and good training with helpful data transformation connectors

The data transformation and use of the pre-connectors have been really useful. We are able to clean and convert files before data is ingested into SQL. The workflow allows us to find errors and fix them as well easily. The interface is really nice and easy to learn. The workflow process helps us save time when we need to figure out which part of the workflow is failing. The time spent on fixing issues is reduced drastically. The data transformation connectors are really nice since we are able to work with data in any format. The training material is really good.

Read full review

KavitaChavan

Associate Manager at Baariz

Quite flexible and provides excellent performance for API gateway

The only disadvantage I can see is that it requires heavy hardware support, which can be considered quite expensive. In terms of new functionality, I think the analytics can be improved in V10. The analytics feature was better in the older version, 2.18. But in V10, it's not as flexible. When exporting analytics as KSP or JSON, it's not well formatted. They can work on enhancing the analytics part. Additionally, they can focus on reducing the hardware cost.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Great for data flow."

"The Flowgear tool is helping us reduce the manual work that is done."

"The solution has increased efficiency and productivity and saved us time and money."

"The no-code visual front end, along with pre-built samples, allows someone with very little technical ability to get an integration up and running."

"It has improved our integration with our data supplier."

"Well-managed version control of workflows and the simplicity in promoting workflows through each environment has aided my team in developing workflows for various environments without the risk of losing development work."

"Being able to seamlessly make changes to how one can do mapping visually without having to be a seasoned developer is great."

"IBM API Connect is a reliable and scalable solution."

"The statistics component is easy to use."

"This product is well integrated with other products. Its ability to interact with IBM Secure Gateway and other integration products is the core feature. Also, the lead time to put it into production is relatively short ."

"We are able to share those APIs instantly within the organization; even if we want to share it outside publicly, then we can have those capabilities."

"The interface is very nice. It makes the solution easy to use and navigate."

"The most valuable feature of IBM API Connect is the security of the protocol."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is very easy to use and is something that is easily configurable."

"API Connect is a good product, and everything works fine. All the analytics are good, and it is easy to follow up. I like it in that sense. I'm more focused on following up on analytics by seeing how many API calls we are getting and where we see a lot of problems. I was working on that API level."

More IBM API Connect pros

Cons

"The product would be nice if it could provide the deployment features in the lower packages."

"The software itself needs to keep up with the daily demand to service all clients as the need arises."

"The product needs to improve the self-help tools and samples."

"The initial setup was a bit complex as we were new."

"Currently, when designing and testing larger workflows, the sessions timeout and re-authentications are frequently required."

"We would like to see more learning videos for beginners."

"The UI could be improved."

"There are issues with upgrading in the cloud version. The cloud version is extremely buggy. We prefer to use the on-premise version."

"Business applications could be exposed to users."

"The implementation process could benefit from improvements, as it may take some time to become accustomed to the deployment."

"IBM info-center help documentation also needs improvement. Competitive product like Apigee provide out of the box policies to run Javascript, JAVA and better/flexible logging policies."

"Different versions of the same thing can mean unnecessary duplication."

"It would be helpful to have access monitoring."

"We have encountered challenges with IBM API Connect, particularly during significant upgrades. These upgrades demand substantial labour and financial resources, including consulting services from IBM. I'd like to see increased flexibility, more frequent updates with new features, an efficient upgrade process, and additional AI capabilities for future releases."

"Extracting the data could be improved."

More IBM API Connect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I rate the product price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"We pay for the IBM API Connect monthly. We only need to pay the standard licensing fee."

"IBM API Connect could be cheaper."

"There was a need to purchase an upfront license or a one-time license or upfront license, but I cannot remember the details about it clearly."

"The price of the solution is very expensive, it can turn many customers away."

"It would be a good idea to bring down the pricing by at least 20 to 30 percent."

"API Connect is expensive - I'd rate their pricing five out of ten."

"It is a pretty expensive tool."

More IBM API Connect pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

24%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about IBM API Connect?

Publishers can easily identify, create, and publish APIs on the developer portal, defining plans, packages, and potentially billing rules.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM API Connect?

Price depends on many factors like size of the deal, competitive factors, timing, customer profile or where the pricing for API Calls is very competitive comparing to any of the leader players.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM API Connect?

The only downside where improvements are needed is probably on the licensing side. Scalability is an issue with IBM API Connect, making it an area where improvements are required.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 25% of the time

Apigee vs IBM API Connect

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs IBM API Connect

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 7% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs IBM API Connect

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM API Connect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear

April 2025

Download Flowgear product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM API Connect

April 2025

Download IBM API Connect product report

Overview

Flowgear enables companies of all sizes to increase efficiency and reduce cost by integrating their apps, services, API’s and databases. No coding with 200+ pre-built connectors, reusable workflows and APIs.

Flowgear

IBM API Connect facilitates API management and integration in the financial sector. Companies use it to expose, secure, and manage APIs for banking, insurance, and fintech, deploying it on-premises, in the cloud, or as a hybrid solution.

IBM API Connect focuses on creating and monetizing APIs while enabling seamless transactions and integration with third-party services. It is vital for compliance with regulations and enhances external communication among institutions. With deployment options suitable for different environments, it supports centralized gateway management, robust security features, and comprehensive API lifecycle management. Users benefit from powerful analytics, user-friendly interfaces, and high performance with capabilities in message transformation and efficient monitoring.

What are the most important features?

Centralized Gateway: Manages all APIs through a single entry point.
Robust Security: Ensures API protection with advanced security measures.
Comprehensive API Lifecycle Management: Covers creation, deployment, and retirement of APIs.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies API creation and management tasks.
Powerful Analytics: Provides insights into API usage and performance.
Seamless Integration: Connects easily with third-party services and internal systems.
Flexible Deployment Options: Supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.
High Performance: Optimizes API performance and reduces latency.
Message Transformation: Manipulates and formats messages between different systems.
Visualization Tools: Enables clear and detailed views of API usage statistics.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

API Monetization: Generates additional revenue streams from APIs.
Enhanced Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry regulations and standards.
Improved External Communication: Facilitates integration and communication among financial institutions.
Technical Support: Benefit from reliable customer support and easy configuration.
Deployment Flexibility: Choose from on-premises, cloud, or hybrid options.

IBM API Connect is extensively implemented in the financial sector, enabling banking, insurance, and fintech services to manage APIs efficiently. Companies use it to ensure secure transactions, integration with third-party services, and compliance with regulatory standards. Its deployment flexibility accommodates different infrastructure needs, making it suitable for a wide range of financial applications.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Heineken, Tine, Finologee, Axis Bank

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear vs. IBM API Connect

April 2025

Free Report: Flowgear vs. IBM API Connect

Find out what your peers are saying about Flowgear vs. IBM API Connect and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Flowgear vs. IBM API Connect report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.