FileAudit vs OpenText Behavioral Signals comparison

IS Decisions and OpenText are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. IS Decisions is ranked #61, while OpenText is ranked #40 with an average rating of 7.7. IS Decisions holds a 0.5% mindshare in SIEM, compared to OpenText’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IS Decisions users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

FileAudit

Read 3 FileAudit reviews

860 Views
507 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Behavioral Signals

Read 5 OpenText Behavioral Signals reviews

1,234 Views
963 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

FileAudit

OpenText Behavioral Signals

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

FileAudit and OpenText Behavioral Signals compete in data security and analytics. OpenText Behavioral Signals has the upper hand in advanced features, whereas FileAudit stands out for cost-effectiveness and support.

Features: FileAudit offers real-time monitoring, alerting, and reporting, enhancing data protection and compliance. OpenText Behavioral Signals provides advanced behavioral insights, with a focus on predicting and understanding user behaviors. FileAudit targets file security, while OpenText emphasizes behavioral analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FileAudit provides an easy deployment process and reliable customer service, aiding efficient onboarding. OpenText Behavioral Signals requires a more complex setup due to its advanced analytics but offers comprehensive training and responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: FileAudit is a cost-efficient solution offering significant ROI with its focus on security. OpenText Behavioral Signals, despite higher initial costs, justifies the investment through extensive features and improved data analytics, leading to substantial ROI over time.

To learn more, read our detailed FileAudit vs. OpenText Behavioral Signals Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FileAudit vs. OpenText Behavioral Signals

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FileAudit

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

61st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (54th)

OpenText Behavioral Signals

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

40th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of FileAudit is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Behavioral Signals is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Behavioral Signals	0.7%
FileAudit	0.5%
Other	98.8%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

AntoSebastin

Cyber Security Consultant - APAC at Logon Software

A scalable SIEM solution for monitoring a user's activity in the file server

The most valuable features of the solution are its quick and simple features related to advanced permissions for files, allowing for what permission needs to be granted to the users when it comes to the monitoring folder in the solution. If someone who has been denied permission to use a particular folder tries to go to that folder, then the administrator gets a notification. In general, the administrator can easily gather and maintain records if a person who has been denied permission to a particular confidential folder tries to access it.

Read full review

Pravir KumarSinha

Information Security at Synechron

Has essential threat detection capabilities, but the features for intelligence need enhancement

We integrated this tool with our security infrastructure. We installed it on a Linux server, where we have a Logger and ESM installed. With the Linux server as the hub, we manage all the configurations and rules, including those for email triggers. The logs are routed through a connector to the Logger, allowing us to monitor our infrastructure effectively. The platform helps us improve threat detection capabilities. I recommend it to others and rate it a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a good and stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"Alerting upon file changes is the most valuable aspect of the product."

"Our customer acquires the complete report which is kept for future auditing purposes."

"The platform helps us improve threat detection capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of ArcSight Intelligence is a single console where the entire dashboard gives all the connected details in a single place."

"We found the correlation engine to be very good. It takes logs from different types of devices and does the correlation in a good way."

"The product has a valuable interface."

"The ability to tailor an environment to suit our specific use cases is a major advantage of ArcSight compared to other logging servers such as Splunk."

Cons

"The updates management and central management console could be improved."

"The DLP function, including installation of the agent on the workstation and controlling the DLP restrictions, are areas where the product lacks."

"Whenever someone cuts and paste, it shows as "file is deleted"."

"We haven't found the product fully scalable."

"ArcSight Intelligence's pricing needs improvement."

"The dashboard is not user-friendly and is in black and white."

"The frequency of the updates that we are getting can be improved because the number and types of incidents that are happening at the global level are far more than what we are receiving. The frequency of updates feeds related to our rules should be increased. There should be more frequent information about the new rules that are coming and the global threats that are happening. There should be better options for dashboard creation. At present, the dashboards are good, but there is scope to make them better."

"ArcSight Intelligence is a bit slower, and its speed should be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FileAudit provides a trial license for 30 days, and after that, customers can choose between perpetual licensing or the annual-based licensing option offered by FileAudit."

"The solution is expensive and only suitable for enterprise environments."

"ArcSight Intelligence is an expensive solution."

"They offer perpetual licenses for the product."

"It is an expensive platform."

"Its price is average and not very high. Splunk might be a bit cheaper than this. Its licensing is on a monthly basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user186927

Director of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Feb 16, 2015

Cybereason vs. Interset vs. SQRRL

Capture DB - they all use NoSQL db and hence solve the ad hoc query and 'go back in time' problem with current best of breed SIEM and DLP solutions that rely on real time analysis of incoming logs (and don't store them). This means deeper and quicker iterative threat analysis and assessment…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Government

17%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about ArcSight Interset / Intelligence?

The platform helps us improve threat detection capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Interset / Intelligence?

They offer perpetual licenses for the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ArcSight Interset / Intelligence?

The product could be improved in several areas; it currently requires significant enhancement. Compared to QRadar and Splunk, ArcSight Intelligence falls behind, placing it as the third choice amon...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs FileAudit

Compared 38% of the time

ManageEngine File Audit Plus vs FileAudit

Compared 20% of the time

Trellix Helix Connect vs FileAudit

Compared 10% of the time

Change Auditor for Windows File Servers vs FileAudit

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs FileAudit

Compared 8% of the time

More FileAudit Competitors

Microsoft Sentinel vs OpenText Behavioral Signals

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs OpenText Behavioral Signals

Compared 10% of the time

Trellix Helix Connect vs OpenText Behavioral Signals

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs OpenText Behavioral Signals

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs OpenText Behavioral Signals

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Behavioral Signals Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

January 2026

Download FileAudit product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

January 2026

Download OpenText Behavioral Signals product report

Also Known As

No data available

ArcSight Interset / Intelligence, FileTrek, Interset UEBA, Micro Focus Interset UEBA, Micro Focus Interset, ArcSight Interset

Overview

Agentless, remote and non-intrusive, FileAudit offers a simple more user-friendly way to safeguard and secure file access in a Windows environment. FileAudit provides real-time monitoring and alerting on all access (or access attempts). FileAudit also implements contextual functions such as mass access and alteration alerts, tracking source IP address information for remote data access, and providing granular time and date alerting parameters to monitor folder and file access at unusual or unexpected times.

IS Decisions

OpenText Behavioral Signals enhances organizational security monitoring with its robust correlation engine and streamlined dashboard, offering customization to suit different environments like airports or banks.

OpenText Behavioral Signals effectively integrates device logs through its strong correlation engine. The platform's customization options enable tailored alerts to match specific use cases, such as airports or banks. Although it needs more frequent updates to stay aligned with global incidents, it provides a centralized dashboard that ensures comprehensive visibility across networks. Users find the interface intuitive, making rule writing and report access easy, aiding in a comprehensive understanding of the network environment.

What are the key features of OpenText Behavioral Signals?

Correlation Engine: Integrates logs from diverse devices for seamless analysis.
Customization: Tailors alerts based on specific industry needs such as banks.
Centralized Dashboard: Offers complete visibility into network activities.
Easy Rule Writing: Facilitates enhanced usability for users.
Intuitive Interface: Provides streamlined access to reports and insights.

What benefits should businesses expect when using OpenText Behavioral Signals?

Increased Security: Effective monitoring and alerts enhance network safety.
Global Intelligence Gathering: Access to global attack notifications keeps organizations informed.
Reduced False Positives: Improved accuracy in detecting genuine threats.
Improved Log Management: Efficient handling of security and network device logs.

In industries like banking and airports, OpenText Behavioral Signals is implemented for gathering global intelligence from the cloud. It notifies organizations about global attacks and updates its correlation engines. These industries utilize the platform for monitoring and analyzing logs from network devices, security log management, and addressing network challenges like link failures and unauthorized login attempts, ensuring better security posture with behavioral analytics and log integration using Unix and Microsoft-based connectors.

OpenText

Sample Customers

CommuniCare Health Centre, DP World, BAE Systems, Moet Hennessy, Ernst & Young, Honda, Volswagon, VTech, GlakoSmithKline, Lockheed Martin, US Navy, University of Alabama, Ministry of Interior Saudi Arabia, Total

Accuvant, Splunk Inc., NuTech, Box, rSolutions, Voodoo Technology Limited

Buyer's Guide

FileAudit vs. OpenText Behavioral Signals

December 2025

Free Report: FileAudit vs. OpenText Behavioral Signals

Find out what your peers are saying about FileAudit vs. OpenText Behavioral Signals and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FileAudit vs. OpenText Behavioral Signals report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.