Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FICO Falcon Platform vs IdentityMind comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 12, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FICO Falcon Platform
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IdentityMind
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
56th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of FICO Falcon Platform is 8.8%, up from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IdentityMind is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2511618 - PeerSpot reviewer
Real-time capability, consortium data model but offline analysis of transactions is not flexible
FICO users are business users, not developers. When setting up rules or parameters, some coding is required, and the learning curve is quite steep. This is a disadvantage of FICO. Additionally, the offline analysis of transactions is not flexible. Transactions need to be flagged as fraud to show up in the analysis, making it difficult to identify false negatives. The Identity Resolution Engine (IRE), an extension to FICO Falcon Platform, is helpful. However, integration with FICO Falcon Fraud Manager can be challenging due to its rigid template and data format requirements. This can cause delays in development and integration, potentially postponing projects by a month or two. AI is another thing they could improve is how they create the data model for my bank's detection data. From what I understand, they already have the capability to do that. But the data being processed in my bank, the ones they can process, is not really much. Maybe it's just a mistake on my part. But in terms of AI other than machine learning that they've already implemented, I have not seen any significant use case.
DB
Great third-party integrations, very stable and easy to set up
Some of the language around rules and integration can certainly be improved. Account creation rules and account creation flows were very helpful to me and very easy to understand, however, the management of transactions on the platform is not very good. The integration between the management of transactions and the management of account creation is quite low. I would love it if they could combine the two and make it a little bit more robust. Mostly the challenge that I faced is some of the limiting rules or some of the fraud-related checks or preventive measures that we were taking, if we could take that on the account creation side, the transaction side, it would not carry over. We would have to redo the same thing there. The number of rooms on the transaction side was fewer. What I want is deeper and better integration between a transaction and an actual account that's been created today. Let's say that I opened the details for the transaction to figure out something about it. The transaction is coming from a different geography. I want to know what's going on with it. If I could do that, I would ideally like to know who is doing the transaction without separately having to go and find this account through email search or whatever. Linkage between the two is pretty low and rules as well are not very integrated between the two. In terms of AML and transaction management use cases, they do aggregate transactions. For example, let's say over a period of one month I do five transactions. Their backend system knows how many transactions I've done, yet they don't expose that to me on the user's side. I cannot see that and report it. I have to do a calculation. If I'm the user, as in I'm the company that's using it, I have to run calculations on my side to figure out how much transaction has gone through.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"FICO is working on a local model specifically for Brazil, whereas tools from Oracle and other vendors are only developed for general use. I haven't seen any other vendors who think like that until now."
"It can make real-time decisions or real-time declines."
"The automated checks are excellent."
"They have a very wide variety of rules that allow you to integrate well."
 

Cons

"When setting up rules or parameters, some coding is required, and the learning curve is quite steep."
"I've had bad experiences with FICO support. At the bank, we've faced critical problems where we only had minutes to find the solution, and it's hard to explain quickly. We contacted FICO, but they told us it was beyond their scope of support. They try to triage the call by asking us how much money we're losing, but I can't go into that."
"Some of the language around rules and integration can certainly be improved."
"The UI at first felt like it wasn't the easiest interface to interact with."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FICO is one of the best fraud detection platforms. However, a small bank might find it too expensive. In that case, I would agree it's probably not worth it. However, it's a no-brainer if your bank has 50 million accounts and 7 million credit card transactions daily."
"The functionality is fine, but the price is getting more expensive."
"The SaaS model that we pay is what I know the cost for, and it's reasonable. It's about just under $1,000 or something per month. There is a certain number of users that you get free."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
43%
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Government
3%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with FICO Falcon Platform?
FICO users are business users, not developers. When setting up rules or parameters, some coding is required, and the learning curve is quite steep. This is a disadvantage of FICO. Additionally, the...
What is your primary use case for FICO Falcon Platform?
I use FICO Falcon app manager. I think it was from 2019, but I'm not quite sure. Maybe it was 2017. I'm a customer of the product, and I use it for bottom-line and operational risk. For the granula...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Falcon Platform
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Veem, Mercari, Fundbx, Binance, Huobi, Mezu, Montual
Find out what your peers are saying about FICO Falcon Platform vs. IdentityMind and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.