We performed a comparison between F5 Shape Security and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease of configuration."
"F5 Shape Security's most valuable feature is performance."
"Nice's most valuable feature would be its rule engine."
"The solution loads big data efficiently and quickly."
"I like the tracking methodology. Though it was implemented on-premises, the compliance is compatible with it. It will have certain modifications with RPM and APR. It has good exposure from a compliance point of view."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"It's a very good case management system."
"The most valuable feature is the designer, which allows us to connect to UI and build things directly, such as creating a platform with our synchronizing policy manager rules, without any additional requirements."
"The most valuable feature is automation which makes our transaction capture 40 percent easier."
"The case management tool is user friendly."
"I want the solution's custom exclusion rules to be more granular."
"The tool's price is high."
"I would say — Actimize is not being moved forward by Nice."
"I would like for it to proactively give suggestions or hints before initiating the transaction. It could make use of the data that has already occurred, like machine learning. It should learn patterns from specific countries."
"It would be better if it integrated with other tools. Actimize uses many databases, and everything on Actimize has been deployed to the database. On the customer side, on the front end side, if they focus more on integrating with other applications, it can make the tool better. The reporting feature and dashboards could be better. In the next release, I would like them to incorporate a Tableau-type reporting structure within this tool."
"From the front end side, the UI is definitely user-friendly. It is highly compatible as long as the reading is at the coding point of view. But it can't provide certain high coding. When a person clicks on any kind of scenario or alert, I would like to have a metadata help menu."
"Sometimes when we move from one version to another, a few things don't work as expected."
"The solution needs to mitigate and provide an update for one listener process that keeps failing."
"Processes don't function when front end is down."
"The patch section has room for improvement."
More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
F5 Shape Security is ranked 7th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 2 reviews while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 1st in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 17 reviews. F5 Shape Security is rated 8.6, while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of F5 Shape Security writes "Easy to configure and blocks bot attacks for web users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Highly intelligent and effective for detecting fraud in transactions". F5 Shape Security is most compared with Akamai Bot Manager, Cloudflare, Akamai App and API Protector, HUMAN BotGuard for Applications and F5 Silverline Managed Services, whereas Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, ThreatMetrix and Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub. See our F5 Shape Security vs. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management report.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.