ExtremeSwitching vs Juniper QFX Series Switches comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Extreme Logo
1,137 views|676 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Juniper Logo
1,669 views|1,383 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ExtremeSwitching and Juniper QFX Series Switches based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Center Networking solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed ExtremeSwitching vs. Juniper QFX Series Switches Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"ExtremeSwitching fabric technology is a unique technology used to protect against viruses. ExtremeCloud IQ is a very good and feature-rich solution compared to Cisco, Ruxi Networks, or Huawei.""They are good. We have been using them for about two years, and we are satisfied with their performance. For our network environment, these switches are working fine.""The most valuable features of ExtremeSwitching are that they are robust and have plenty of features. There is a lot of functionality. They have a lot of other features ExtremeSwitching that you can get involved with but I haven't been using many of them.""It is meeting our expectations in terms of performance as well as cost-effectiveness.""ExtremeSwitching is a good, stable platform.""The solution can scale.""The unique ring topology is actually a handy innovation.""The stability has been largely pretty good."

More ExtremeSwitching Pros →

"The most valuable features are the VxLAN and the EVPN.""The QFX series is a good choice for large data centers, particularly for Spine-Leaf architectures.""Juniper QFX Series Switches provide a good platform for all of our hardware and are easy to use.""It's a stable solution.""EVPN-VXLAN feature offers the most benefits.""It's really easy to replicate rules. It's the one that I've used; it was CLI-based. You can implement a large set of rules with CLI. You can just copy a script and add additional changes to the source and destination on the part. And so it's easy to do large zone-based rules."

More Juniper QFX Series Switches Pros →

Cons
"ExtremeSwitching switches are not prevalent in the industry, so it's harder to go online and research how to deploy their APs or switches. There is a broader user community for Cisco and Juniper because they've been around for a while and everybody has a bit of knowledge they can publish online.""I believe they should be more aggressive in terms of pricing.""We noticed over the years that the price of the Extreme Switches has been rising and this will become a concern in the future.""The training and resources for learning are lacking.""The solution as a whole has hardware quality issues.""Their pricing could be a bit cheaper, as Huawei switches offer better pricing.""ExtremeSwitching hardware lacks flexibility compared to some other options.""There are latency issues that need to be addressed."

More ExtremeSwitching Cons →

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model. It is too high.""The price could be cheaper.""There have been some issues sometimes. When you upgrade the device, it doesn't come up. It gets stuck.""I faced issues with the deployment and upgrade. In the QFX5110 series, features like ISSU and DSSQ should be improved. Upgrades should be smoother.""Integrating QFX switches was the first point of challenge."

More Juniper QFX Series Switches Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "On pricing, ExtremeSwitches are going to beat most of the major competition."
  • "It is not a subscription-based model, and there is no licensing concept. We have to pay for hardware AMC. We have hardware on our premises and for the hardware support, we have to go for the annual maintenance contract with the partner."
  • "The pricing and licensing are good with the cloud."
  • "There is a cost for ExtremeSwitching and if you want the support and maintenance, there are additional costs. My clients typically pay for the support and maintenance annually."
  • "There is no license required to use the solution. The hardware controller is expensive, and this is why I prefer controlling ExtremeSwitching on the cloud."
  • "The price is expensive. We pay for a license, but you have to pay more if you want to increase the number."
  • "We paid 25,000 to 30,000 INR."
  • "ExtremeSwitching offers very good pricing plans for their licenses. Compared to their rivals, ExtremeSwitching's prices are very affordable and reasonable. This is why our customers are happy to pay for their service critical support. ExtremeSwitching also offers a great portal to track clients, further satisfying our customers. They are always happy to pay for the service every month. The pricing is very reasonable."
  • More ExtremeSwitching Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of Juniper QFX Series Switches is expensive because we are running some enterprise hardware. However, they are less expensive than Cisco or HPE hardware."
  • "The cost is expensive."
  • "The solution is cheap, especially compared to competitors like Cisco."
  • More Juniper QFX Series Switches Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Center Networking solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution excels in configuration and other aspects. It offers reliability and performance.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive because of its working nature.
    Top Answer:ExtremeSwitching hardware lacks flexibility compared to some other options.
    Top Answer:EVPN-VXLAN feature offers the most benefits.
    Top Answer:The solution is cheap, especially compared to competitors like Cisco.
    Top Answer:Integrating the QFX switches was the first point of challenge, particularly aligning them with our data center's architecture. I also had challenge with scalability.
    Ranking
    5th
    Views
    1,137
    Comparisons
    676
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    424
    Rating
    8.4
    6th
    Views
    1,669
    Comparisons
    1,383
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    501
    Rating
    8.8
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    ExtremeSwitching is the family of products comprising different switch types: Modular (X8 and 8000 series [formerly BlackDiamond] and S and K series switches); Stackable (X-series and A, B, C, and 7100 series switches); Standalone (SSA, X430, and D, 200, 800, and ISW series); and Mobile Backhaul (E4G). ExtremeSwitching work from Edge Switching that ensures the performance and reliable operation of end-user devices and applications including port density, bandwidth, and network services to Aggregation / Core Switches is designed for the demanding needs of aggregation, top-of-rack and campus core environments, these switches deliver 10Gb, 40Gb and even 100Gb bandwidth with maximum throughput and reliability.

    QFX Series Switches deliver industry-leading throughput and scalability, an extensive routing stack, the open programmability of the Junos OS, and a broad set of EVPN-VXLAN and IP fabric capabilities. With QFX, you’ll find premier solutions for data center spine-and-leaf, campus distribution, core, and data center gateway and interconnect switching.

    Rethink data center operations and fabric management with turnkey Juniper Apstra software in your QFX Series environment. You can automate the entire network lifecycle to simplify design and deployment and provide closed-loop assurance. With Apstra, customers have achieved 90% faster time to deployment, 70% faster time to resolution, and 83% OpEx reduction.


    Sample Customers
    Blue Waters
    Linode, VPRO, West Chester University
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    University17%
    Government17%
    Security Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Construction Company10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise28%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    ExtremeSwitching vs. Juniper QFX Series Switches
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ExtremeSwitching vs. Juniper QFX Series Switches and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ExtremeSwitching is ranked 5th in Data Center Networking with 17 reviews while Juniper QFX Series Switches is ranked 6th in Data Center Networking with 6 reviews. ExtremeSwitching is rated 8.4, while Juniper QFX Series Switches is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of ExtremeSwitching writes "Easy to configure, with a switching-level security feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper QFX Series Switches writes "Offers high port density, including 1/25G/40G/100G and 400 options upto 2 RU and lower power consumption and leverages Broadcom chipsets for enhanced performance". ExtremeSwitching is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, Cisco Nexus and NETGEAR Switches, whereas Juniper QFX Series Switches is most compared with Cisco Nexus, PTX Series Routers and Juniper MX Series Universal Routing Platforms. See our ExtremeSwitching vs. Juniper QFX Series Switches report.

    See our list of best Data Center Networking vendors.

    We monitor all Data Center Networking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.