ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs Snyk comparison

Read 47 Snyk reviews

5,927 Views
924 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 4, 2025

Snyk and ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 are competing products in the cybersecurity space, focusing on vulnerability detection and network security analytics. Snyk is recognized for its pricing and support, while ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is valued for its comprehensive features and robust capabilities.

Features: Snyk provides developer-centric vulnerability scanning and integrates with popular DevOps tools, facilitating seamless workflow integration. It promotes proactive management of security issues within the development pipeline. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 offers real-time network intelligence, advanced threat detection, and response capabilities, specifically designed for complex network environments in large enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 supports deployment flexibility across various environments, coupled with detailed service support, catering to enterprises' specific security needs. Snyk prioritizes ease of integration with development pipelines, enabling rapid deployment in CI/CD environments. Both companies provide comprehensive customer service, though ExtraHop offers more tailored customer engagement.

Pricing and ROI: Snyk is known for its budget-friendly setup, offering a significant return on investment from proactive vulnerability management. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 might require a higher initial investment but delivers clear ROI through enhanced security insights and efficient threat mitigation, appealing to enterprises seeking in-depth network analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Snyk Report (Updated: June 2025).

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Snyk

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Ranking in Container Security

28th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (18th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (10th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (26th)

Snyk

Ranking in Container Security

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Cloud Management (16th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (16th), DevSecOps (2nd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 5.5%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Maksym Toporkov

Head of Research And Development at Quipu GmbH

A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives

The NDR feature analyzes network traffic, creating records with connection details. While these records offer insights, there's a limitation in investigating payloads directly. ExtraHop provides an option for an additional server to save payloads, but its temporary storage has constraints. Unlike some competitors, it lacks an automatic payload-saving feature for each detection, presenting an improvement opportunity. Suggested enhancement involves the main sensor prompting payload storage for specific detections, streamlining the investigation process, and contributing to a more efficient workflow. A drawback includes packet storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations.

Read full review

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Affordable tool boosts code scanning efficiency but faces integration hurdles

The most important feature of Snyk is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions such as Check Point. It is easy to consolidate Snyk across multiple entities within a large organization. Additionally, our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is scalable."

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

"Snyk performs software composition analysis (SCA) similar to other expensive tools."

"The most valuable feature of Snyk is the software composition analysis."

"The code scans on the source code itself were valuable."

"The advantage of Snyk is that Snyk automatically creates a pull request for all the findings that match or are classified according to the policy that we create. So, once we review the PR within Snyk and we approve the PR, Snyk auto-fixes the issue, which is quite interesting and which isn't there in any other product out there. So, Snyk is a step ahead in this particular area."

"Snyk's focus on security is a valuable feature. Also Snyk supports multiple programming languages, which has positively affected my security practices. I use only two or three languages, and when I change the language in a file, it detects it in the same suite. I find the AI-powered scanning overall beneficial.Using Snyk's AI-powered scanning, I can detect around ten or twenty errors in my project with about twenty thousand lines of code, so it helps improve my project by identifying a lot of potential vulnerabilities."

"I am impressed with the product's security vulnerability detection. My peers in security are praising the tool for its accuracy to detect security vulnerabilities. The product is very easy to onboard. It doesn't require a lot of preparation or prerequisites. It's a bit of a plug-and-play as long as you're using a package manager or for example, you are using a GitHub repository. And that is an advantage for this tool because developers don't want to add more tools to what they're currently using."

"It is easy for developers to use. The documentation is clear as well as the APIs are good and easily readable. It's a good solution overall."

"The valuable aspect is its security capabilities."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

"There needs to be more support."

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

"We've also had technical issues with blocking newly introduced vulnerabilities in PRs and that was creating a lot of extra work for developers in trying to close and reopen the PR to get rid of some areas. We ended up having to disable that feature altogether because it wasn't really working for us and it was actually slowing down developer velocity."

"We have seen cases where tools didn't find or recognize certain dependencies. These are known issues, to some extent, due to the complexity in the language or stack that you using. There are some certain circumstances where the tool isn't actually finding what it's supposed to be finding, then it could be misleading."

"Snyk has several limitations, including issues with Gradle, NPM, and Xcode, and trouble with AutoPR."

"We use Bamboo for CI.CD, and we had problems integrating Snyk with it. Ultimately, we got the two solutions to work together, but it was difficult."

"It would be helpful if we get a recommendation while doing the scan about the necessary things we need to implement after identifying the vulnerabilities."

"A feature we would like to see is the ability to archive and store historical data, without actually deleting it. It's a problem because it throws my numbers off. When I'm looking at the dashboard's current vulnerabilities, it's not accurate."

"Could include other types of security scanning and statistical analysis"

"It would be ideal if there was customization with a focus on specific cybersecurity areas or capabilities."

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

"It's inexpensive and easy to license. It comes in standard package sizing, which is straightforward. This information is publicly found on their website."

"We are using the open-source version for the scans."

"The price is good. Snyk had a good price compared to the competition, who had higher pricing than them. Also, their licensing and billing are clear."

"Snyk is an expensive solution."

"Snyk is a premium-priced product, so it's kind of expensive. The big con that I find frustrating is when a company charges extra for single sign-on (SSO) into their SaaS app. Snyk is one of the few that I'm willing to pay that add-on charge, but generally I disqualify products that charge an extra fee to do integrated authentication to our identity provider, like Okta or some other SSO. That is a big negative. We had to pay extra for that. That little annoyance aside, it is expensive. You get a lot out of it, but you're paying for that premium."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a three. It is a cheap solution."

"For what Snyk offers, it has the best cost-benefit I have ever seen because you're buying the license per user."

"Compared to Veracode, Snyk is definitely a cheaper tool."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

University

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for...

What needs improvement with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

What advice do you have for others considering ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

I recommend prioritizing demos over POCs when engaging with vendors. Organizing POCs involves significant time and resource investments for both parties. Instead, invest time in multiple demo sessi...

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Comparisons

Compared 28% of the time

Wiz vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 16% of the time

Corelight vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 16% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 13% of the time

Forescout Platform vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 13% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 11% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Black Duck vs Snyk

Compared 6% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

June 2025

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Download Snyk product report

May 2025

Also Known As

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

Fugue

Overview

Cloud is where your business operates, where it innovates, how it enables employees, and how it connects with customers. Adversaries know this, and that's why attacks against cloud assets in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS environments are increasing. With Reveal(x) 360, you can mitigate the blast radius of advanced threats like ransomware and supply chain attacks with unified security across multicloud and hybrid environments in a single management pane.

ExtraHop Networks

Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.

Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.

What are the key features of Snyk?

Easy Integration: Snyk integrates with CI/CD pipelines, GitHub, and JIRA for seamless security management.
Multilingual Support: It offers extensive programming language support, enhancing project compatibility.
Actionable Insights: Provides accurate vulnerability detection with actionable remediation guidance.
Cloud and Container Security: Offers comprehensive checks for cloud and container environments, improving security posture.
Automation & Notifications: Automates vulnerability alerts and notifications for early threat identification in development.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Time Efficiency: Speeds up development by identifying and fixing vulnerabilities early in the software lifecycle.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes security risks with extensive vulnerability scanning and proactive alerting.
Productivity Boost: Enhances productivity by integrating security directly into developers' workflows.
Improved Compliance: Aids in maintaining license compliance and managing open-source dependencies effectively.

Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.

Sample Customers

Wizards of the Coast

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief