Evanios vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring comparison

Evanios and Instana are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Evanios is ranked #68, while Instana is ranked #32 with an average rating of 9.5. Evanios holds a 0.2% mindshare in IM, compared to Instana’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Evanios users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Instana users who would recommend it.

Evanios

Read 6 Evanios reviews

220 Views
119 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Instana Infrastructure Moni...

Read 2 Instana Infrastructure Monitoring reviews

574 Views
487 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Evanios

Instana Infrastructure Moni...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Evanios and Instana Infrastructure Monitoring compete in the infrastructure monitoring space. Instana emerges as superior due to its robust features and real-time data processing, which users find worth the price.

Features: Evanios offers integration capabilities, an effective alert management system, and efficient issue resolution. Instana provides AI-driven insights, comprehensive visibility into application performance, and advanced analytics with automation.

Room for Improvement: Evanios can enhance its advanced analytics and automation features, improve the responsiveness of support services, and streamline the user interface for better usability. Instana could offer more budget-friendly pricing options, enhance its integration with third-party tools, and further simplify complex feature setups for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Instana Infrastructure Monitoring has an intuitive deployment model and strong customer support, offering smooth onboarding and continuous assistance. Evanios provides straightforward deployment, but its process is not as streamlined as Instana's, which, along with responsive customer service, gives Instana an edge.

Pricing and ROI: Evanios requires a lower initial setup cost, appealing to businesses with budget constraints, while it delivers satisfactory ROI through efficient integration. Instana has a higher setup cost but justifies the investment with superior analytics and long-term ROI, leading to favorable cost-benefit outcomes.

To learn more, read our detailed Evanios vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Evanios vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Evanios

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

68th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (17th), IT Operations Analytics (17th)

Instana Infrastructure Moni...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

32nd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Evanios is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Instana Infrastructure Monitoring is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

it_user592602

Works at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

The vendor is willing to work with us and develop solutions for products they did not already have an integration for.

As with any new software implementation, during the integration we found a couple of minor issues when integrating certain products (such as SCOM). However, each time this happened Evanios was very quick to identify the bug we were seeing, patch it and provide the new update set for us to install. Also, during the evaluation of Evanios we found that they already had integrations with most of our larger monitoring tools, however they also stated that they would be able to create update sets to integrate certain products we used that they did not currently support. This proved to be very valuable for us because they were able to become an even better fit for our organization by creating update sets\integrations for PRTG, Quest Foglight, TIBCO and Thousand Eyes as well.

Read full review

Hakimuddin Ronaque

Assistant Manager at Lauren Information Technologies Pvt Ltd

Has the capability to automatically integrate with a large number of products

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten. I have not worked much on other technologies, like SAP or VMware's virtualization part, on-prem infrastructure, or cloud infrastructure. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring is so fast and easy to adapt that it works fine. I have not explored other operating systems or infrastructure solutions because my company doesn't have that customer scale. Most of our customers are on-prem or on AWS or Azure, but Instana Infrastructure Monitoring adapts to their infrastructure very well. My company came to know how well Instana Infrastructure Monitoring adapts to our customers' infrastructures when we take care of the PoC phase. Around 12 to 15 people in my company use the product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Provided up to a 90% noise reduction in some our noisy monitoring tools."

"The most valuable feature is the integration with various alert-generating systems because you might have synthetic alerts or monitoring alerts for volume drops."

"The ability to manipulate events via JavaScript getting the exact data that we want."

"The product's initial setup is easy."

"The product is easy to deploy."

Cons

"We would like the ability to have an "exit" option for events when they are being processed."

"More complex correlation rules would be nice. The ability to clearly define a parent event in a correlation and nested correlations, specifically."

"The price could be cheaper."

"The product’s scalability is an area with certain limitations, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Instana Infrastructure Monitoring needs to support monitoring of the .NET framework since it is one of the areas where the solution currently has shortcomings."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The cost of the tool is around 130 USD per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Instana Infrastructure Monitoring?

The product is easy to deploy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Instana Infrastructure Monitoring?

The product’s scalability is an area with certain limitations, making it an area where improvements are required.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Instana Infrastructure Monitoring?

I use the solution in my company, especially if an application is down and it is considered to be a P1 issue or a critical issue. The network team will blame the application team, while the applica...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 44% of the time

Zabbix vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 21% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 18% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 17% of the time

More Instana Infrastructure Monitoring Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Evanios

May 2025

Download Evanios product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

April 2025

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring report

Download Instana Infrastructure Monitoring product report

Overview

A key component of the Event Management process is consolidation of events from across the enterprise. By consolidating disparate events into a single solution, they can be de-duplicated and correlated. For example, network failure events can be correlated with system failures, and then prioritized based on service impact.

Reduce the noise

Evanios Integrations allows filtering and processing close to the event source, keeping the weight off of the ServiceNow system for increased performance. Filters are easily configured. EVA, the Evanios consolidation point also has built in event flood control features, to protect against unexpected event storms which can quickly overload traditional integrations.

Evanios

Instana ensures that your application delivery organization has the data, visibility and information they need to manage the performance of critical business applications across the DevOps lifecycle. Built to handle the dynamic nature of containerized, microservice architectures, Instana automates infrastructure and application monitoring helping you to ensure the performance and quality of custom applications and accelerate your CI/CD cycle.

Instana

Sample Customers

Greenville Health System, Land O’Lakes, AstraZeneca

booxware, drivenow, scopevisio, enevo, TimoCom, mobitech

Buyer's Guide

Evanios vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

April 2025

Free Report: Evanios vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Find out what your peers are saying about Evanios vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Evanios vs. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.