Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Serverless vs erwin Evolve comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

erwin Evolve
Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management
14th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (21st)
Serverless
Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management
15th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of erwin Evolve is 3.4%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Serverless is 0.1%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Architecture Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
erwin Evolve3.4%
Serverless0.1%
Other96.5%
Enterprise Architecture Management
 

Featured Reviews

Asish Sahu - PeerSpot reviewer
SPM at Infosys
The reverse engineering capabilities are quite useful.
Evolve is primarily focused on the entity's licenses diagrams, but it would be nice if erwin could integrate case development, so that it shows the ER diagram plus certain inputs on the use cases and how the data is used. That deviates somewhat from the overall scope, so maybe they could call it a different product.
TC
Sr. IT Engineer at Best Western
Server management headaches have disappeared and deployment of APIs is now fully automated
My advice to others looking into using Serverless is that you don't need to worry about the server maintenance, the servers, and where you host the servers. All these headaches go away. Definitely it's good to use. All the headaches that we have been doing for all these years can be gotten rid of, definitely. This has been a great initiative taken by AWS. Previously, we thought that we cannot host our applications without any server, but AWS proves us wrong by creating a Serverless application, the option to deploy our applications without any server. This is a really great initiative done by AWS. I rate this solution an eight out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Performing Arts
11%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Serverless?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that some of these are done by my solutions architect and I will not have enough information about that in my current role as a product mana...
What needs improvement with Serverless?
I struggled with wanting to put breakpoints throughout the code and then use the debugger. At the time, I was not able to step through the code with breakpoints, so if Serverless had that support, ...
What is your primary use case for Serverless?
Our main use case for Serverless is to build Serverless APIs, and the complete back-end is built with Serverless. A specific example of an API or back-end workflow built using Serverless is a parts...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

erwin EA, erwin Business Process, erwin Enterprise Architecture
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AT&T, Bank of America, Chevron, Duke University, ESPN, Fidelity, GE, JP Morgan Chase, KPMG, McGraw Hill, NASA, Pfizer, Royal Bank of Scotland, Teradata, Union Pacific, Vodafone, Wells Fargo.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Serverless vs. erwin Evolve and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.