This user profile does not exist.

DX Spectrum vs Infraon IMS comparison

Broadcom and EverestIMS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.7, while EverestIMS is ranked #83. Broadcom holds a 1.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to EverestIMS’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of EverestIMS users who would recommend it.

DX Spectrum

Read 118 DX Spectrum reviews

11,344 Views
7,147 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews

2,997 Views
1,768 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX Spectrum

Infraon IMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

DX Spectrum and Infraon IMS compete in the network management solutions category, with Infraon IMS providing a cost-effective alternative to the pricier DX Spectrum. Infraon IMS seems to have the upper hand for organizations focused on budgeting due to its flexible pricing model.

Features: DX Spectrum offers robust network topology views, comprehensive fault management, and extensive device compatibility. It provides automated device discovery and integrates seamlessly with CA products. Infraon IMS is noted for its customizable dashboards, straightforward role-based access, and WAN infrastructure monitoring with flexible drill-down capabilities.

Room for Improvement: DX Spectrum needs a modernized web-based interface and better integration with third-party tools. It also faces issues with reliance on Java, impacting usability and updates. Infraon IMS could enhance AI predictive features and improve its GUI for easier configuration. Licensing clarity and handling larger asset loads effectively are other areas for enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both DX Spectrum and Infraon IMS offer on-premises deployment. Infraon IMS is highly rated for customer service with responsive technical support. DX Spectrum has strong technical support expertise but is criticized for slower response times post-Broadcom acquisition, with a strong community support network aiding problem-solving.

Pricing and ROI: DX Spectrum has higher costs, typically chosen by large enterprises due to its extensive features that provide significant ROI. Infraon IMS offers more affordable, feature-specific pricing, making it budget-friendly for various enterprise sizes with flexible licensing that aligns with financial and operational needs.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Spectrum vs. Infraon IMS Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

DX Spectrum vs. Infraon IMS

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Spectrum

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

18th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

118

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (8th), Network Troubleshooting (6th), DX NetOps (1st)

Infraon IMS

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

83rd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

56th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (32nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (48th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Spectrum is 1.6%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
DX Spectrum	1.6%
Infraon IMS	0.5%
Other	97.9%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

PinchasAlbalya

Network Engineer at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

Monitoring has become centralized and management now sees real‑time health of key network assets

The time investment required is significant, not because of difficulty but because of the need for free time to invest in it. We need to get the knowledge. We know there are many options, but we took an external vendor to install and make the customization. If we want to make others changes without paying for customization, we need to learn it deeply by ourselves. The tutorials are very complicated. They could work on that area. The tutorial part could be more simplified. I know there are many explanations, and you can get help or documents in one click on the current page in the product, but it is not very clear. If you want to do something new that you did not see from the vendor in the installation, it is not very simple. The documents are good for people that know how to operate the product well, but for new users, it is not simple.

Read full review

it_user1631601

GTM Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Our process efficiency has improved by having all the information in one place, which has reduced manpower

The product is great. We integrated the ticketing tool with the monitoring tool. The agent ID creation is very easy when using this tool. It is so user-friendly. The user interface is good and also the pricing is great. The user interface is good, even a business user or layman can raise a ticket. They provide an all-in-one monitoring tool. If an issue happens, it gets integrated with the email, then proactively that ticket is being raised, which is good. The reporting is good. It is very clear. It is a customized report; however you want it, you can customize it. We use the solution’s role-based dashboards. The head of IT wants to use it so he can see holistically what is happening, e.g., what are the tickets being raised, what is a major issue, and what escalations are happening. There are different dashboards that are customized. For our head of IT, we made a separate dashboard. Then, for the executives, we made a separate dashboard based on time, like hourly or daily. All these reports were customized. While they didn't provide a BI dashboard, they provide a kind of graphical dashboard for whatever the issue is. Once you click on a particular ticket, it drills down to the issue, what it is and when the issue was raised. The drill down is good. It is more like a business intelligence (BI) tool. You can just scroll and zoom in. It goes deep into the issue. Once you click a particular dashboard, it will take you to the next page, then it takes you to the issue. Infraon IMS provides workflow automation for real-world use cases. This makes our work easier. It is just drag and drop (no coding) to build the workflows. For example, a particular ticket is being raised. It gets routed to three important IT executives within our team. From our team, it gets routed to the next level. The learning curve is good. Initially, there were no issues. As soon as the users saw the product, they understood what the product was. There wasn't any kind of training required for this product because it is very straightforward.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall it is a good tool."

"Easy navigation from initial alerts to a full topology and detail on the Network infrastructure and it relationships is the most valuable feature"

"As a user of it, it's been fantastic just because it does so many things all in one configuration section."

"The containerization of different objects was very helpful in building an org structure. Being able to separately manage your MSP clients with separate visibility was also helpful."

"The fault management is perfect."

"It was used as a tool to observe critical alarms on network nodes and act immediately."

"It is the perfect monitoring solution for customers' devices."

"The response detection of an incident was very low, that is, I could work more efficiently and effectively in my incident management."

More DX Spectrum pros

"It is a stable product; after the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much, and all systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."

"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."

"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."

"With Infraon, everything is already built-in so you are able to plug-and-play with the system."

"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."

"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."

"Overall, it's a wonderful one-stop ITSM solution for infrastructure."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product."

More Infraon IMS pros

Cons

"It takes some time to learn how to use this solution."

"I think the management or configuration of devices needs some improvement."

"Yes, IM was very shaky and it seemed like CA were throwing hotfixes at us to fend us off until the next release."

"A lot of the filtering and orchestration of the background takes a lot of manual work."

"The interface is not nice and needs to be improved."

"It's not a great performance management tool. Its reporting capabilities are not very good at all."

"Today with Spectrum we work in a reactive way where we notice problems after they occur."

"Support from Broadcom could be better. Sometimes we wait a very long time for a solution to level three problems."

More DX Spectrum cons

"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."

"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets."

"Technical support could use some improvement in terms of their response times and diagnostic accuracy."

"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."

More Infraon IMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"DX Spectrum's pricing depends on the license number. It is affordable."

"Since the acquisition by Broadcom, we have not had such a good experience with licensing and pricing. Since they were bought by Broadcom, every sales contract is getting complicated. It's very complicated, and it's much more expensive than before. It's not a good pricing strategy from Broadcom."

"In general, the license cost will be about 30% of the total TCO for this tool (hardware/support team, OS costs, and OS management)."

"It’s a great tool, but an expensive one. Learn how to use it properly."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"Spectrum is expensive."

"The product, support, and maintenance are all expensive, which is another reason that we are switching to another solution."

"The price is very high."

More DX Spectrum pricing and cost advice

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	90

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Spectrum?

The price is very, very high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX Spectrum?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX Spectrum?

The university purchased DX Spectrum, called ICE. DX Spectrum NAC is working for us only on Cisco 9200 switches. It is not working on any other switch like C1000 or HG or any 2960X. Even other Cisc...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs DX Spectrum

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX Spectrum

Compared 6% of the time

Kentik vs DX Spectrum

Compared 4% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX Spectrum

Compared 4% of the time

LogicMonitor vs DX Spectrum

Compared 3% of the time

More DX Spectrum Competitors

Nagios XI vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Compared 5% of the time

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Infraon IMS

Compared 3% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Spectrum

June 2026

Download DX Spectrum product report

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS

June 2026

Download Infraon IMS product report

Also Known As

CA Spectrum

Everest IMS

Overview

DX Spectrum is a comprehensive network monitoring tool designed for scalability and accuracy. With features like fault management, topological mapping, and customizability, it addresses network issues effectively while ensuring reliable infrastructure oversight.

Known for its robust capabilities, DX Spectrum excels in fault management and network monitoring, offering features such as Global Collections and Event Correlation for precise issue detection. This scalability allows it to monitor large infrastructures efficiently using SNMP traps. Automated device discovery and seamless integrations with tools like SOI and Zabbix enhance its functionality, providing users with a streamlined experience. The interface allows for deep visibility and is supported by REST API for improved integration and automation.

What are the key features of DX Spectrum?

Fault Management: Identifies and manages network faults efficiently.
Topological Mapping: Offers a graphical representation of network topology.
Customizability: Provides extensive options to tailor the tool to specific needs.
Global Collections: Enhances issue detection across networks.
Event Correlation: Reduces false alerts by correlating network events.
Scalability: Manages large networks with SNMP traps.
Automated Discovery: Automatically identifies and integrates devices into monitoring.
REST API: Facilitates seamless integration and automation.

Why should users consider DX Spectrum in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Increases efficiency through automation and integration.
Deep Visibility: Provides comprehensive network visibility and control.
Reliability: Ensures stable and reliable network operations.
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with multiple external tools.
Customizability: Allows customization to meet specific monitoring needs.
Proactive Management: Supports proactive issue resolution with accurate notifications.

DX Spectrum finds extensive applications across industries for network infrastructure monitoring. It is vital in sectors where maintaining service uptime and quickly resolving network faults is critical. Organizations leverage its configuration management, alarm/event management, and integration capabilities to maintain smooth network operations, especially in environments with large and complex network infrastructures.

Broadcom

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?

Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.

What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?

Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS

Sample Customers

National Informatics Centre India, Banese, Olympus, AlphaServe Technologies, Sicredi

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

Buyer's Guide

DX Spectrum vs. Infraon IMS

June 2026

Free Report: DX Spectrum vs. Infraon IMS

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Spectrum vs. Infraon IMS and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Spectrum vs. Infraon IMS report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.