DX Performance Management vs Statseeker comparison

Broadcom and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #55 with an average rating of 8.5, while Techniche is ranked #61 with an average rating of 7.0. Broadcom holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

DX Performance Management

Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews

778 Views
451 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

613 Views
546 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

DX Performance Management

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and DX Performance Management are both IT infrastructure monitoring solutions. Statseeker often comes out on top for pricing and ease of use, while DX Performance Management is favored for its comprehensive feature set, offering significant value despite a higher price.

Features: Statseeker includes rapid deployment, capabilities for highly detailed long-term historical data, and efficient network management. DX Performance Management delivers advanced performance analytics, predictive insights, and extensive data analysis capabilities for decision-making enhancement.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker could improve in expanding its feature set, enhancing depth in analytics, and user interface updates. DX Performance Management might refine deployment simplicity, reduce initial learning curve, and optimize resource usage for smaller organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker is straightforward to deploy with simpler configuration requirements, complemented by prompt customer service. DX Performance Management offers a more robust support system to manage its sophisticated features, although deployment is more complex.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker's setup costs are attractive, promising fast ROI with its efficient deployment model. DX Performance Management requires a higher initial investment but offers significant ROI through comprehensive analytics and performance capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Performance Management vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. Statseeker

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,785 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Performance Management

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

55th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (2nd), DX NetOps (2nd)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

61st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Performance Management is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
DX Performance Management	0.3%
Statseeker	0.3%
Other	99.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sandip Kheni

Lead Developer at STL - Sterlite Technologies Limited

The vertical database loads faster than any other product available

We experience disconnections between the solutions own components. In the last five years, there have been many intermittent connection issues with the four components and we still don't know the reasons. The solution has issues when loading groups that have been created in the application interfaces. It would be nice to have a mobile application. In the current industry and technical word, the mobile phone is the only thing that is always in your hands. Other Broadcom products have mobile applications but the solution doesn't offer one. It would be great to view device parameters and view or download graphs from a mobile device.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can have thousands of devices inside and hundreds of thousands of interphases without a problem."

"The out-of-the-box dashboards are valuable, in terms of being able to visualize performance data in ways that we haven't in the past."

"Scalability is the reason we bought the product to begin with. It was designed from the ground up for carrier-grade services, and we are in effect a MSP ourselves. So we were really interested in looking at something to be able to handle the multi-tenancy and scale as large as possible. This was the only solution that we really considered at that level."

"The solution's performance itself is very good because it is a vertical database that loads very fast in comparison to other products."

"We're able to present data from multiple back-end collection sources into a single dashboard for the users. So they don't have to go to multiple locations to get data about a particular item, or device."

"I can get it to run a report showing, for instance, what root drives are in the critical range in terms of being full, like 90 percent full, and disseminate that information to the other areas of the organization."

"Spectrum is very good at monitoring all network faults and configurations."

"Since the implementation of the tool, it has cut down on probably 60% of our outages and letting us know what is going on."

More DX Performance Management pros

"It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading."

"We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."

"Key features for us are custom reporting, 95th Percentile, and trend lines."

"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."

"The most valuable feature is alerting."

"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."

"The most important for us is how fast this solution is, as well as the granularity that you can get to, such as per-minute statistics."

"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"I think it would be helpful having a more comprehensive set of certifications so that I could natively deploy devices to my environment and the tool would immediately recognize and immediately be able to provide relevant performance information without a lot of tuning on my part."

"I'm not a fan of many extra features since they usually burden the software and reduce its reliability."

"When it goes through discovery, or whatever it is doing in the back-end that slows it down, sometimes we get some failures with it. "

"Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved."

"This tool gathers so much data, which makes it hard to convert over. To upgrade it, you really need the solution backed up. That is the issue that we are facing right now."

"Product has issue collecting IP SLA data."

"Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected."

"It could be a little easier to integrate new metrics."

More DX Performance Management cons

"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."

"Configuration management: In configuration management it would be helpful if it would backup configuration files (running and start-up configuration) for devices. (Not sure if this is already available in the latest version)."

"I would like to see the solution incorporate diagnosis of the workstation."

"With Statseeker I'd like to see some flow, i.e. what's tuning-up the network. The trend I like is managing the traffic load by going to the cloud."

"The main issue I've seen, in the last six months to a year, is when I upgrade I seem to be hitting bugs. The upgrade won't go smoothly and I have to engage support. These things happen when you upgrade, it's not the end of the world, but from a stability point of view, the only time I've so far, is during upgrades."

"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."

"I would like to see more comprehensive reporting and alerting."

"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Educational Organization

11%

University

Energy/Utilities Company

11%

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DX Performance Management?

The tool helps us understand network performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Performance Management?

The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management

Compared 24% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs DX Performance Management

Compared 24% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management

Compared 22% of the time

SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs DX Performance Management

Compared 15% of the time

OmniPeek vs DX Performance Management

Compared 15% of the time

More DX Performance Management Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 39% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 26% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 17% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management

October 2025

Download DX Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

September 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

CA Performance Management

No data available

Overview

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. Statseeker

September 2025

Free Report: DX Performance Management vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Performance Management vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Performance Management vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.