Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DocStar ECM vs Objective ECM comparison

Epicor and Objective are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Epicor is ranked #27, while Objective is ranked #22. Epicor holds a 0.5% mindshare in ECM, compared to Objective’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Epicor users are willing to recommend the solution.
DocStar ECM
Read 7 DocStar ECM reviews
  • 248 Views
  • 181 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Objective ECM
Read 1 Objective ECM review
  • 420 Views
  • 378 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between DocStar ECM and Objective ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, IBM and others in Enterprise Content Management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,089 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DocStar ECM
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
27th
Average Rating
9.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Document Management Software (16th)
Objective ECM
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
22nd
Average Rating
4.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of DocStar ECM is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Objective ECM is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Objective ECM1.0%
DocStar ECM0.5%
Other98.5%
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

it_user255402 - PeerSpot reviewer
It has the flexibility to span across multiple departments, improving, for example, accounts-payable automation and contract management.
Ease of use Flexibility to span across multiple departments A/P Automation H/R On boarding Client/Vendor File Management Contract Management Not designed well for high-volume batch capture Does not display the images during the scanning process, so QC is always a post process Over 13…
Read full review
it_user144594 - PeerSpot reviewer
The ability to have duplicate document names is very useful for content migration. During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place.
During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place - even on servers you would not expect - and fragmented into dozens of files, yet the detail is excellent. It's Java execution logs, so needs a bit of interpretation skill, though. Speaking of Java, the web interface requires JRE and degrades in mysterious ways without it: No warnings or graceful fall-back. The web UI is otherwise VERY awkward and limited in functionality. The Windows client on the other hand is extremely dated but rich in functionality - not pretty, though. Despite the API, there is no vendor support for integration into any other systems except through HTML frames.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Government
24%
Manufacturing Company
23%
Computer Software Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise3
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
SharePoint vs Objective ECM Logo
SharePoint vs Objective ECM
Compared 33% of the time
OpenText Content Management vs Objective ECM Logo
OpenText Content Management vs Objective ECM
Compared 24% of the time
OpenText Content Manager vs Objective ECM Logo
OpenText Content Manager vs Objective ECM
Compared 16% of the time
Nuxeo vs Objective ECM Logo
Nuxeo vs Objective ECM
Compared 16% of the time
Atlassian Confluence vs Objective ECM Logo
Atlassian Confluence vs Objective ECM
Compared 11% of the time
More Objective ECM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
DocStar ECM
October 2025
DocStar ECM reportDownload DocStar ECM product report
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
September 2025
Objective ECM reportDownload Objective ECM product report
 

Also Known As

docSTAR eclipse
No data available
 

Overview

Helping businesses translate vision into action for more than 20 years, DocStar offers delivers a flexible and innovative enterprise content management and process automation platform. Easy to implement and use—both in the cloud and on premises—DocStar proven technology and global process expertise empowers organizations to operate at peak performance, navigate change, and grow. By scaling and modernizing operations and enabling greater collaboration, DocStar allows data and transactions to flow efficiently throughout your organization. With increased visibility among employees, customers, and partners, we deliver better business outcomes such as increased auditability and greater ease of compliance.
Epicor

Objective ECM is a comprehensive suite of modules that connects content to people and the business systems they work with on a daily basis. Designed to maximise user adoption with zero training, Objective ECM delivers a simple, fast and personal experience that can be shared on a vast scale.

Objective
 

Sample Customers

Gillette Pepsi CompaniesUnited Way of KnoxvilleUniversity of MichiganMohawk PaperCleveland IndiansThe City of CamdenPenn Foster Career SchoolCapital Cardiology AssociatesCollier Restaurant Group
ACT Planning and Land Authority, Australian Department of Defence, Barwon Water, City of Darebin, Delta Electricity, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Health Corporate Network, Hobsons Bay City Council, LandCorp, Port of Brisbane
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
September 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, IBM and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.