Docker vs ReversingLabs comparison

Docker and ReversingLabs are both solutions in the Software Supply Chain Security category. Docker is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9, while ReversingLabs is ranked #19. Docker holds a 5.0% mindshare in SSCS, compared to ReversingLabs’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Docker users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ReversingLabs users who would recommend it.

Docker

Read 57 Docker reviews

2,794 Views
475 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

ReversingLabs

Read 4 ReversingLabs reviews

2,019 Views
242 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Docker

ReversingLabs

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

ReversingLabs and Docker compete in the software industry, each targeting distinct needs. Docker appears to have the upper hand due to its broad feature set, making it attractive for many technical buyers.

Features: ReversingLabs offers deep threat intelligence and malware detection, valuable for cybersecurity. Docker provides containerization technology, enhancing scalability and flexibility. ReversingLabs focuses on security, while Docker delivers a comprehensive application development and deployment platform.

Room for Improvement: ReversingLabs could improve by expanding its feature set beyond cybersecurity. Enhancing integration options would also be beneficial. Docker can refine its initial setup costs and ensure smoother integration with external security tools. Docker might enhance its reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReversingLabs offers straightforward deployment with a security-focused integration, receiving praise for responsive support. Docker's deployment process is simple and highly regarded for seamless application management via containerization. Its customer service is strengthened by extensive resources and a supportive community.

Pricing and ROI: ReversingLabs is known for lower setup costs, offering strong ROI for cybersecurity-centric organizations. Docker may require higher initial investments but promises greater ROI due to its versatile features and broad adoption. Docker's comprehensive capabilities yield substantial long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Docker vs. ReversingLabs Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Docker vs. ReversingLabs

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Docker

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Development Platforms (1st), Container Management (4th), AI Software Development (7th)

ReversingLabs

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

19th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (42nd), Anti-Malware Tools (46th), Container Security (48th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (25th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (30th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Software Supply Chain Security category, the mindshare of Docker is 5.0%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReversingLabs is 2.5%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Supply Chain Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Docker	5.0%
ReversingLabs	2.5%
Other	92.5%

Software Supply Chain Security

Featured Reviews

reviewer2787357

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

Containerization has standardized deployments and drives faster, more reliable delivery

As Docker is already a very mature tool, there are areas where it can be improved based on real-world usage. One area I consider is the Windows container experience. The pain point here is that Windows containers are heavier and slower than Linux containers because I have worked in both environments and felt that Windows containers are heavier and slower than Linux containers. This also limits the ecosystem and tooling maturity compared to Linux containers. Improvements could include performance optimization and better parity with Linux container features. Apart from that, observability and debugging is another area. The pain point is the limited native metrics available and limited logging and tracing features. Improvements could include adding a good amount of metrics, logging, and tracing, as well as better built-in observability features and easier container introspection. Network complexity is also present. I face issues with Docker networking that can become confusing in complex setups, and debugging container-to-container issues is not always intuitive. Improvements can be made with simpler networking abstractions and better built-in troubleshooting tools. Docker is excellent for containerization and CI/CD, but it can be improved in areas of built-in security, network simplicity, and observability. These points should be kept in mind and worked on.

Read full review

Tim Craig

Forensic Lead, Global Security Fusion Center at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Very good malware and goodware repository and enables us to look more deeply at indicators of compromise

The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild. Also, the solution’s object and file analysis provide us with actionable insights. Its malware and goodware repository is very good. It's very robust. It gets all of the different repositories that are out there that do analysis and brings them under one roof where we can statically analyze for those indicators of compromise and look at them more deeply. If we need to go deeper into things, we can do that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Docker packages up an application as a single item that you can then run without the need to install or configure it to work on any specific machine."

"Docker is highly scalable."

"I think that with Docker, it is easy to deploy it on different platforms."

"The most valuable features of Docker are its security, detailed documentation, and ease of use, and the Docker Swarm is not as complex as Kubernetes."

"Docker is very reliable. It's easy to scale, and it's very stable."

"Docker offers a resilient system with minimal failure chances and optimized performance"

"Docker has had a major positive impact by standardizing how applications are built, shipped, and deployed, which improved speed, reliability, and collaboration across my teams."

"Docker creates lightweight applications that are easy to manage and scale."

More Docker pros

"As far as the malware repository is concerned, it's extensive. It's a good source for finding samples, where we are unable to find them on other channels or by leveraging other sources."

"It offers reports on a great many more file types than the other analysis solutions we have. It can give us a more in-depth analysis and better reporting on a larger number of file types. It also gives us a more comprehensive score on a number of things as well, and that's why we're using it as a front-end filter. It gives us more information... It's valuable because of its depth of information, as well as the breadth it gives us. There aren't a lot of tools that cover all of the different file types."

"As far as static analysis information is concerned, we use most of the information that is available in order to determine whether or not we might be dealing with a malware variant. This includes information that is related to Java rules. This is also related to malware families indicated or specific malicious software variants that are labeled by name."

"ReversingLabs has a large sample size."

"The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild."

Cons

"As for improving Docker, I would like to see enhancements in its user interface and documentation to make it even more user-friendly and accessible. I believe Docker will expand its scope and reduce limitations to support more applications, both online and offline. For instance, in scenarios like deployments on ships or during upgrades, Docker can continue to offer software services and container-based intelligence."

"The stability could be improved."

"We are facing multiple issues with the solution's stability."

"The security layer is very vulnerable, although they are working to improve the system hardening and email hardening."

"The product does not have an extensive documentation. The tool does not have good scenarios. We have to go through the GitHub repository and investigate similar scenarios. Also, if you are copying multiple things, then you can jeopardize the copy number. The copying aspect also lacks a UI part. We also need to limit the memory."

"Docker could improve by having more advanced features."

"Docker volumes. When I integrated volumes, I faced challenges. I have not essentially used add volumes to the existing instances."

"I advise new users to review their website, commands, and the steps for creating images."

More Docker cons

"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets. Right now, I can only do them individually."

"The solution needs to improve integrations."

"We would really like further integration with our threat intelligence platform, which is called ThreatConnect. We would also really like further integrations with an endpoint protection product we use called Tanium. The reason I mentioned both of these is that ReversingLabs claims to have extensive integrations with both of them, but they did not work for us."

"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality."

"The product support could be better at times. Sometimes, the resources that they provide could be of higher quality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The current cost for us is nothing as an open source."

"Regarding pricing, we primarily use AWS for our deployments since we have funding for it. We don't spend much on Docker-specific services, just the containerization product. Docker Hub isn't particularly expensive either, so overall, the pricing is pretty reasonable."

"It's free."

"There is a license needed to use Docker."

"Since Docker is an open-source solution, it is free of cost."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."

"We are using the open-source version of the solution."

"Docker is a free-to-use solution. However, Docker Enterprise is not free."

More Docker pricing and cost advice

"We have a yearly contract based on the number of queries and malicious programs which can be processed."

"Currently, the license number of lookups that we purchased has not been reached yet, because the integration has only recently been completed. However, our usage is expected and planned to increase over the next couple of months."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Supply Chain Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

University

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	35

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Docker?

We are using Docker to host applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Docker?

Regarding the cost, Mirantis Container Cloud is cheaper than other solutions like Red Hat. The license costs around 10,000 Indian rupees per year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Docker?

Mirantis Container Cloud should have AI integration tools, which are not available right now. These tools should assist in app scalability and deployment error handling.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Docker

Compared 11% of the time

Portainer vs Docker

Compared 9% of the time

Minimus vs Docker

Compared 7% of the time

NGINX Ingress Controller vs Docker

Compared 7% of the time

Codespaces vs Docker

Compared 7% of the time

More Docker Competitors

VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs

Compared 13% of the time

JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs

Compared 10% of the time

MetaDefender vs ReversingLabs

Compared 8% of the time

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox vs ReversingLabs

Compared 6% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs ReversingLabs

Compared 6% of the time

More ReversingLabs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Docker

January 2026

Download Docker product report

Buyer's Guide

ReversingLabs

January 2026

Download ReversingLabs product report

Also Known As

No data available

ReversingLabs Titanium, ReversingLabs secure.software

Overview

Docker provides a robust containerization platform, enabling identical environments across machines. With features like portability, fast deployment, and minimal resource consumption, Docker supports development, facilitating multitier architectures and integrating seamlessly with Kubernetes.

Docker offers an advanced containerization solution that enhances application management through automation and security measures. By isolating environments and managing dependencies, Docker supports platforms for scalable application development. Its integration with orchestration tools like Kubernetes and independence from host operating systems enable developers to create lightweight applications effectively. Although known for its cost efficiency and flexibility, Docker could improve in areas such as stability, command-line usability, and Windows performance integration. Users also point out the need for enhanced documentation, simplified management tools, and better persistence storage options, along with stronger marketing and easier user adoption.

What important features does Docker provide?

Containerization: Creates consistent environments across machines.
Portability: Runs on different hosts with ease.
Fast Deployment: Speeds up application launches and updates.
Security: Offers isolation and management of dependencies.
Scaling: Supports application scaling and multitier architectures.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Docker?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces resource usage with lightweight containers.
Flexibility: Integrates with orchestration tools like Kubernetes.
Performance: Enhances resource utilization and onboarding.
On-premises Management: Simplifies managing cloud and local setups.

Industries leverage Docker for application packaging, deploying microservices, and CI/CD processes. It supports DevOps, enhances backend service management, and enables resource-efficient development environments. Docker's compatibility with tools such as Jenkins ensures seamless integration and orchestration in modern IT workflows.

Docker

ReversingLabs is the trusted authority in software and file security. We provide the modern cybersecurity platform to verify and deliver safe binaries. Trusted by the Fortune 500 and leading cybersecurity vendors, the ReversingLabs Titanium Platform® powers the software supply chain and file security insights, tracking over 35 billion files daily with the ability to deconstruct full software binaries in seconds to minutes. Only ReversingLabs provides that final exam to determine whether a single file or full software binary presents a risk to your organization and your customers.

RL - Trust Delivered.

https://www.reversinglabs.com

ReversingLabs

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, oil & gas, telecommunications, information technology

Buyer's Guide

Docker vs. ReversingLabs

December 2025

Free Report: Docker vs. ReversingLabs

Find out what your peers are saying about Docker vs. ReversingLabs and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Docker vs. ReversingLabs report.

See our list of best Software Supply Chain Security vendors.

We monitor all Software Supply Chain Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.