Devo vs SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server comparison

Devo and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while SolarWinds is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.5. Devo holds a 1.4% mindshare in Log Management, compared to SolarWinds’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 26 Devo reviews

6,972 Views
3,625 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Read 7 SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server reviews

3,204 Views
3,076 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Devo

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Devo and SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server are market players in data management and analysis. Devo seems to have the upper hand in user satisfaction with pricing and support, while SolarWinds offers a superior feature set that users find valuable for its price.

Features: Devo's powerful analytics, scalability, and ability to efficiently manage large data volumes are notable. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server stands out with its simplicity, ease of integration, and extensive protocol support, simplifying network management.

Room for Improvement: Devo could improve its reporting tools, simplify advanced features, and refine its complexity. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server could develop better documentation, improve third-party integration, and increase support resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo, though more complex to deploy, is supported by a responsive and knowledgeable customer service team. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server facilitates quick deployment and straightforward setup but receives mixed service reviews regarding promptness.

Pricing and ROI: Devo incurs higher initial setup costs but users report better long-term ROI, emphasizing its powerful analytics for business insights. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server offers competitive pricing with quicker returns attributable to its lower initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (18th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (13th)

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Ranking in Log Management

27th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is 1.2%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.4%
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server	1.2%
Other	97.4%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

SJ6

Network Security Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Valuable log segregation aids in auditing, but Windows integration needs enhancement

Our primary use case for Kiwi Syslog is for gathering logs necessary for auditing purposes I appreciate that with Kiwi Syslog, we can segregate the logs based on the display, such as using different colors and fonts, which helps greatly in identifying logs by their severity. This feature is…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the immediate improvements that come to mind is the amount of hot, searchable data, as in the SIEM we had before we were only able to search back 90 days of hot, searchable data, whereas here we have 400 days worth, which has definitely improved our threat hunting capabilities."

"Having one integrated tool helped us by removing the multiple teams, multiple pieces of equipment, and multiple software solutions from the equation."

"But from a SaaS standpoint, if not best-in-breed, Devo is certainly in the top-two or top-three."

"The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way."

"Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive."

"Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

"It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC."

"Devo helps us to unlock the full power of our data because they have more than 450 parsers, which means that we can ingest pretty much any type of log data."

More Devo pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the alerting based on the security logs."

"The most valuable feature of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is its performance and management. Additionally, the solution integrates well."

"If anyone needs log management, we recommend SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server."

"Simplicity is the most valuable feature."

"The best thing about Kiwi Syslog is that it filters logs into different levels."

"The most valuable features of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server include its ability to provide network mapping and deliver information to my customers about their networks through various methods."

"I definitely recommend this solution."

"I appreciate that with Kiwi Syslog, we can segregate the logs based on the display, such as using different colors and fonts, which helps greatly in identifying logs by their severity."

More SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server pros

Cons

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc."

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there."

"Some of the documentation could be improved a little bit. A lot of times it doesn't go as deep into some of the critical issues you might run into. They've been really good to shore us up with support, but some of the documentation could be a little bit better."

"Both response time and support quality need attention."

"Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"It's stable but it's not extremely stable."

More Devo cons

"The Windows log forwarder is not functioning properly."

"The Windows log forwarder is not functioning properly. This is a significant concern, as it led to losing a deal due to the inability to provide Windows logs effectively."

"There is a need for an on-premises solution, which could lead to easier sales in larger markets."

"Technical support could definitely be better."

"SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server could improve by reducing the price."

"I would like to see a more user-friendly and customizable dashboard."

"SolarWinds pricing is perceived as very high in the market, which can be a barrier for many customers."

"I would like to have email notifications for emergency logs."

More SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"The price of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server could improve."

"We subscribe and pay directly on the website."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps. Its licensing model is basically on per-day ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I am using Devo myself. Basically, I work at an MSSP, and we provide services to the organization for Security Operation Centers. In our Security Operation Center, we provide the service of SIEM vi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server?

SolarWinds pricing is perceived as very high in the market, which can be a barrier for many customers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server?

The Windows log forwarder is not functioning properly. This is a significant concern, as it led to losing a deal due to the inability to provide Windows logs effectively. It should be more user-fri...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server?

Our primary use case for Kiwi Syslog is for gathering logs necessary for auditing purposes.

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

syslog-ng by One Identity vs SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds Log Analyzer vs SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Cloud Platform vs SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Compared 6% of the time

Sumo Logic Security vs SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Compared 6% of the time

Scribbler Log Manager vs SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Compared 5% of the time

More SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

August 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

August 2026

Download SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

Kiwi Syslog Server

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is widely used for log management, known for its log filtering capabilities using colors and fonts. Integration with other systems and simplicity are valued aspects, alongside crucial network mapping and configuration management features.

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server offers comprehensive log management, aiding in auditing and network analysis. It's utilized by infrastructure engineers to track login failures and server issues. The server enhances syslog management and service discovery, providing critical log generation for audits. Many organizations aim to integrate its features for centralized log storage, valuing its contribution to improved network visibility.

What are the main features of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server?

Log Filtering: Allows filtering of logs by severity using distinctive colors and fonts.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with other systems.
Network Mapping: Facilitates simplified user processes.
Configuration Management: Simplifies network configurations.
Security Alerting: Provides alerting capabilities for security threats.

What benefits should users consider?

Enhanced Visibility: Improves network visibility through comprehensive log management.
Performance Monitoring: Key for optimal server performance tracking.
Security Preparedness: Alerts enhance safety by notifying threats promptly.
Auditing Support: Essential for audits with robust log generation and collection.

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is implemented across industries for its log management capabilities, being pivotal to infrastructure teams. It's used to manage network security and monitor performance efficiently. Despite needing improvements such as better search functions and real-time log visibility without a browser, it's considered integral by companies aiming for centralized log storage and network analysis. Organizations are also seeking an affordable pricing model and regional language expansion, while aiming for expanded features like a customizable dashboard and SMS alerting for high-priority messages.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Holy Cross Energy, West Texas A&M University, Medium Enterprise Industrial Manufacturing Company

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

August 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.