Devo vs SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.2, while SolarWinds is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.5. Devo holds a 1.4% mindshare in Log Management, compared to SolarWinds’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 27 Devo reviews

7,893 Views
4,025 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Read 7 SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server reviews

3,438 Views
3,300 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Devo

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Devo and SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server are market players in data management and analysis. Devo seems to have the upper hand in user satisfaction with pricing and support, while SolarWinds offers a superior feature set that users find valuable for its price.

Features: Devo's powerful analytics, scalability, and ability to efficiently manage large data volumes are notable. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server stands out with its simplicity, ease of integration, and extensive protocol support, simplifying network management.

Room for Improvement: Devo could improve its reporting tools, simplify advanced features, and refine its complexity. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server could develop better documentation, improve third-party integration, and increase support resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo, though more complex to deploy, is supported by a responsive and knowledgeable customer service team. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server facilitates quick deployment and straightforward setup but receives mixed service reviews regarding promptness.

Pricing and ROI: Devo incurs higher initial setup costs but users report better long-term ROI, emphasizing its powerful analytics for business insights. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server offers competitive pricing with quicker returns attributable to its lower initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (16th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (16th)

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Ranking in Log Management

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is 1.1%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.4%
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server	1.1%
Other	97.5%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

SJ6

Network Security Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Valuable log segregation aids in auditing, but Windows integration needs enhancement

Our primary use case for Kiwi Syslog is for gathering logs necessary for auditing purposes I appreciate that with Kiwi Syslog, we can segregate the logs based on the display, such as using different colors and fonts, which helps greatly in identifying logs by their severity. This feature is…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The querying and the log-retention capabilities are pretty powerful. Those provide some of the biggest value-add for us."

"It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC."

"The user interface is really modern. As an end-user, there are a lot of possibilities to tailor the platform to your needs, and that can be done without needing much support from Devo. It's really flexible and modular. The UI is very clean."

"Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."

"The most useful feature for us, because of some of the issues we had previously, was the simplicity of log integrations. It's much easier with this platform to integrate log sources that might not have standard logging and things like that."

"But from a SaaS standpoint, if not best-in-breed, Devo is certainly in the top-two or top-three."

"One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."

"When we show the people who are in charge of getting funding that we saved this number of man-hours, which correlates to this number of dollars, they're more willing to fight to get that funding for the next fiscal year."

More Devo pros

"The best thing about Kiwi Syslog is that it filters logs into different levels."

"Overall, I rate SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server ten out of ten."

"I definitely recommend this solution."

"Simplicity is the most valuable feature."

"We are very happy with the stability of the solution."

"If anyone needs log management, we recommend SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server."

"The most valuable features of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server include its ability to provide network mapping and deliver information to my customers about their networks through various methods."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the alerting based on the security logs."

More SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server pros

Cons

"The price is one problem with Devo."

"Technical support could be better."

"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."

"There's room for improvement within the GUI. There is also some room for improvement within the native parsers they support. But I can say that about pretty much any solution in this space."

"They can improve their AI capabilities"

"The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities."

"Both response time and support quality need attention."

"My opinion on the solution's technical support is not as great as it could be because of the issues I have faced regarding the service management element."

More Devo cons

"I would like to see a more user-friendly and customizable dashboard."

"SolarWinds pricing is perceived as very high in the market, which can be a barrier for many customers."

"The Windows log forwarder is not functioning properly."

"Technical support could definitely be better."

"I would like to see better search functions and better filters in the next release."

"The Windows log forwarder is not functioning properly. This is a significant concern, as it led to losing a deal due to the inability to provide Windows logs effectively."

"I would like to have email notifications for emergency logs."

"There is a need for an on-premises solution, which could lead to easier sales in larger markets."

More SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"The price of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server could improve."

"We subscribe and pay directly on the website."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

Perhaps Devo could add some features in the future on the network part. Specifically, I think they could improve network traffic analysis capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I have been using Devo as a partner and system integrator for three years. For log monitoring, the clients' use cases can utilize Devo perfectly. Compliance and security operation monitoring are th...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server?

SolarWinds pricing is perceived as very high in the market, which can be a barrier for many customers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server?

The Windows log forwarder is not functioning properly. This is a significant concern, as it led to losing a deal due to the inability to provide Windows logs effectively. It should be more user-fri...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server?

Our primary use case for Kiwi Syslog is for gathering logs necessary for auditing purposes.

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

syslog-ng by One Identity vs SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Compared 8% of the time

Sumo Logic Security vs SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds Log Analyzer vs SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Cloud Platform vs SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Compared 7% of the time

Scribbler Log Manager vs SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Compared 5% of the time

More SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

October 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

September 2026

Download SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

Kiwi Syslog Server

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is widely used for log management, known for its log filtering capabilities using colors and fonts. Integration with other systems and simplicity are valued aspects, alongside crucial network mapping and configuration management features.

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server offers comprehensive log management, aiding in auditing and network analysis. It's utilized by infrastructure engineers to track login failures and server issues. The server enhances syslog management and service discovery, providing critical log generation for audits. Many organizations aim to integrate its features for centralized log storage, valuing its contribution to improved network visibility.

What are the main features of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server?

Log Filtering: Allows filtering of logs by severity using distinctive colors and fonts.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with other systems.
Network Mapping: Facilitates simplified user processes.
Configuration Management: Simplifies network configurations.
Security Alerting: Provides alerting capabilities for security threats.

What benefits should users consider?

Enhanced Visibility: Improves network visibility through comprehensive log management.
Performance Monitoring: Key for optimal server performance tracking.
Security Preparedness: Alerts enhance safety by notifying threats promptly.
Auditing Support: Essential for audits with robust log generation and collection.

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is implemented across industries for its log management capabilities, being pivotal to infrastructure teams. It's used to manage network security and monitor performance efficiently. Despite needing improvements such as better search functions and real-time log visibility without a browser, it's considered integral by companies aiming for centralized log storage and network analysis. Organizations are also seeking an affordable pricing model and regional language expansion, while aiming for expanded features like a customizable dashboard and SMS alerting for high-priority messages.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Holy Cross Energy, West Texas A&M University, Medium Enterprise Industrial Manufacturing Company

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

September 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.