Devo vs SmartEvent Event Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and Check Point Software Technologies are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.2, while Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #58 with an average rating of 4.0. Devo holds a 1.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Check Point Software Technologies’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 27 Devo reviews

7,893 Views
4,262 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SmartEvent Event Management

Read 2 SmartEvent Event Management reviews

1,502 Views
1,457 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

SmartEvent Event Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Devo and SmartEvent Event Management are both event management tools. SmartEvent is considered superior due to its richer features, making it worth the investment.

Features: Devo offers real-time analytics, scalability, and efficient performance. SmartEvent Event Management stands out with comprehensive threat detection, correlation capabilities, and a robust feature set suited for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Devo needs better documentation, a more intuitive interface, and enhancement in navigation. SmartEvent can improve integration capabilities, streamline initial setup, and reduce critical improvement areas.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo has straightforward deployment and excellent customer support, though navigation can be less intuitive. SmartEvent provides superior customer service and training resources, with a more complex setup but better support during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Devo offers competitive setup costs and good ROI due to efficient performance. SmartEvent, while higher in price, justifies the cost with advanced features and effective threat management, resulting in strong ROI despite the higher initial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. SmartEvent Event Management Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. SmartEvent Event Management

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,325 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (17th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (16th)

SmartEvent Event Management

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

58th

Average Rating

5.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SmartEvent Event Management is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.2%
SmartEvent Event Management	0.5%
Other	98.3%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Adhi Wahyu

Network Engineer at RSUP Dr. Sardjito

Transparent and offers real-time analysis but needs more documentation

The solution provides us with transparency to give us information about what happens in the network. With this information, the administrator can see a lot of things. They can see hacking attempts from the internet that target our servers, and, with that information, they can check the security settings in the server to see if it is strong enough or not, and make sure the servers is safe. They also can see attacks directed to the endpoint. We know which endpoint got infected so we can take action to clean it. The software also has good reporting capabilities. We can create custom reports according to our needs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a joy to partner and be able to work with this kind of system."

"The user experience [is] well thought out and the workflows are logical. The dashboards are intuitive and highly customizable."

"Devo helps us to unlock the full power of our data because they have more than 450 parsers, which means that we can ingest pretty much any type of log data."

"The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."

"It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC."

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

"The most powerful feature is the way the data is stored and extracted. The data is always stored in its original format and you can normalize the data after it has been stored."

"The features I find most valuable in Devo are that it works on unstructured data."

More Devo pros

"The capability of real-time analysis of security events is useful."

"SmartEvent Event Management is a solid platform overall, and I would definitely recommend it."

Cons

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring."

"From our experience, the Devo agent needs some work. They built it on top of OS Query's open-source framework. It seems like it wasn't tuned properly to handle a large volume of Windows event logs. In our experience, there would definitely be some room for improvement. A lot of SIEMs on the market have their own agent infrastructure. I think Devo's working towards that, but I think that it needs some improvement as far as keeping up with high-volume environments."

"There are some issues from an availability and functionality standpoint, meaning the tool is somewhat slow. There were some slow response periods over the past six to nine months, though it has yet to impact us terribly as we are a relatively small shop. We've noticed it, however, so Devo could improve the responsiveness."

"Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution."

"My opinion on the solution's technical support is not as great as it could be because of the issues I have faced regarding the service management element."

"One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo."

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."

More Devo cons

"They should provide easy to access guides or manuals, maybe videos, about how to manage or use the software effectively and efficiently, to maximize its features."

"The only downside I've encountered with SmartEvent Event Management is occasional lag during video calls, especially with a lot of participants."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,325 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

Perhaps Devo could add some features in the future on the network part. Specifically, I think they could improve network traffic analysis capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I have been using Devo as a partner and system integrator for three years. For log monitoring, the clients' use cases can utilize Devo perfectly. Compliance and security operation monitoring are th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SmartEvent Event Management?

The only downside I've encountered with SmartEvent Event Management ( /categories/event-monitoring ) is occasional lag during video calls, especially with a lot of participants. Although it is not ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SmartEvent Event Management?

Our primary use case involves utilizing SmartEvent Event Management ( /products/smartevent-event-management-reviews ) for video conferencing, file sharing, and integration with other productivity t...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SmartEvent Event Management?

SmartEvent Event Management is a solid platform overall, and I would definitely recommend it. I would rate the overall solution four out of five stars.

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Enterprise SIEM vs SmartEvent Event Management

Compared 38% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs SmartEvent Event Management

Compared 37% of the time

OpenText Behavioral Signals vs SmartEvent Event Management

Compared 4% of the time

NetWitness Platform vs SmartEvent Event Management

Compared 4% of the time

LevelBlue USM Anywhere vs SmartEvent Event Management

Compared 3% of the time

More SmartEvent Event Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

October 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

September 2026

Download SmartEvent Event Management product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

SmartEvent Event Management offers advanced tools for monitoring, analyzing, and managing security events, providing real-time threat detection and simplified incident response.

This platform enhances control over security operations through its robust reporting and analytics capabilities. SmartEvent Event Management centralizes event correlation and monitoring, leading to higher efficiency in security tasks. It helps users stay compliant with regulations and supports real-time threat investigation. With intuitive event scheduling, the software elevates event planning and execution through seamless integration and customization options.

What are the key features of SmartEvent Event Management?

Real-time threat detection: Identify and respond to security threats as they occur
Compliance management: Ensure adherence to necessary regulations
Centralized monitoring: Maintain complete oversight of security events
Event scheduling: Plan and organize events efficiently
Customizable reporting: Tailor reports to meet specific needs
Integration capabilities: Seamlessly connect with other platforms
Performance tracking: Monitor the effectiveness of security measures

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced visibility: Improved control over security operations
Increased efficiency: Streamlined security tasks through automation
Reliable performance: Consistent and dependable operation
Better communication: Effective coordination within teams

In specific industries, SmartEvent Event Management can be implemented to streamline security operations, ensuring real-time threat detection and compliance with industry regulations. Its customization options and integration capabilities make it adaptable for various sectors, enhancing event planning and execution in finance, healthcare, and more.

Check Point Software Technologies

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. SmartEvent Event Management

September 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. SmartEvent Event Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. SmartEvent Event Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,325 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. SmartEvent Event Management report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.