Devo vs SmartEvent Event Management comparison

Devo and Check Point Software Technologies are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #58 with an average rating of 4.0. Devo holds a 1.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Check Point Software Technologies’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 26 Devo reviews

6,972 Views
3,835 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SmartEvent Event Management

Read 2 SmartEvent Event Management reviews

1,251 Views
1,226 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

SmartEvent Event Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Devo and SmartEvent Event Management are both event management tools. SmartEvent is considered superior due to its richer features, making it worth the investment.

Features: Devo offers real-time analytics, scalability, and efficient performance. SmartEvent Event Management stands out with comprehensive threat detection, correlation capabilities, and a robust feature set suited for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Devo needs better documentation, a more intuitive interface, and enhancement in navigation. SmartEvent can improve integration capabilities, streamline initial setup, and reduce critical improvement areas.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo has straightforward deployment and excellent customer support, though navigation can be less intuitive. SmartEvent provides superior customer service and training resources, with a more complex setup but better support during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Devo offers competitive setup costs and good ROI due to efficient performance. SmartEvent, while higher in price, justifies the cost with advanced features and effective threat management, resulting in strong ROI despite the higher initial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. SmartEvent Event Management Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. SmartEvent Event Management

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (18th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (13th)

SmartEvent Event Management

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

58th

Average Rating

5.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SmartEvent Event Management is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.2%
SmartEvent Event Management	0.4%
Other	98.4%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Adhi Wahyu

Network Engineer at RSUP Dr. Sardjito

Transparent and offers real-time analysis but needs more documentation

The solution provides us with transparency to give us information about what happens in the network. With this information, the administrator can see a lot of things. They can see hacking attempts from the internet that target our servers, and, with that information, they can check the security settings in the server to see if it is strong enough or not, and make sure the servers is safe. They also can see attacks directed to the endpoint. We know which endpoint got infected so we can take action to clean it. The software also has good reporting capabilities. We can create custom reports according to our needs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

"Because of the way Devo works, our onboarding time has shrunk by 50 percent at least."

"Devo has improved our visibility, log management efficiency, and investigation capabilities positively."

"Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."

"The most useful feature for us, because of some of the issues we had previously, was the simplicity of log integrations. It's much easier with this platform to integrate log sources that might not have standard logging and things like that."

"Devo helps us to unlock the full power of our data because they have more than 450 parsers, which means that we can ingest pretty much any type of log data."

"The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins."

"One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."

More Devo pros

"SmartEvent Event Management is a solid platform overall, and I would definitely recommend it."

"The capability of real-time analysis of security events is useful."

Cons

"They can improve their AI capabilities"

"Both response time and support quality need attention."

"There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. I would go as far as to say the product is deficient in its ability to parse multiple, different log types, including logs from major vendors that are supported by competitors. Additionally, the time that it takes to turn around a supported parser for customers and common log source types, which are generally accepted standards in the industry, is not acceptable. This has impacted customer onboarding and customer relationships for us on multiple fronts."

"An admin who is trying to audit user activity usually cannot go beyond a day in the UI. I would like to have access to pages and pages of that data, going back as far as the storage we have, so I could look at every command or search or deletion or anything that a user has run. As an admin, that would really help. Going back just a day in the UI is not going to help, and that means I have to find a different way to do that."

"The cost is a little higher compared to other tools such as DataDog or Elasticsearch, so they could work on reducing costs."

"Technical support needs to be more direct. For example, when we submit a ticket, the support team will delegate a task to the operations team, for example, or various other teams."

"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel."

More Devo cons

"They should provide easy to access guides or manuals, maybe videos, about how to manage or use the software effectively and efficiently, to maximize its features."

"The only downside I've encountered with SmartEvent Event Management is occasional lag during video calls, especially with a lot of participants."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps. Its licensing model is basically on per-day ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I am using Devo myself. Basically, I work at an MSSP, and we provide services to the organization for Security Operation Centers. In our Security Operation Center, we provide the service of SIEM vi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SmartEvent Event Management?

The only downside I've encountered with SmartEvent Event Management ( /categories/event-monitoring ) is occasional lag during video calls, especially with a lot of participants. Although it is not ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SmartEvent Event Management?

Our primary use case involves utilizing SmartEvent Event Management ( /products/smartevent-event-management-reviews ) for video conferencing, file sharing, and integration with other productivity t...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SmartEvent Event Management?

SmartEvent Event Management is a solid platform overall, and I would definitely recommend it. I would rate the overall solution four out of five stars.

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs SmartEvent Event Management

Compared 45% of the time

Enterprise SIEM vs SmartEvent Event Management

Compared 45% of the time

OpenText Behavioral Signals vs SmartEvent Event Management

Compared 3% of the time

Snare vs SmartEvent Event Management

Compared 3% of the time

Juniper Secure Analytics vs SmartEvent Event Management

Compared 3% of the time

More SmartEvent Event Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

August 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

August 2026

Download SmartEvent Event Management product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

SmartEvent Event Management offers advanced tools for monitoring, analyzing, and managing security events, providing real-time threat detection and simplified incident response.

This platform enhances control over security operations through its robust reporting and analytics capabilities. SmartEvent Event Management centralizes event correlation and monitoring, leading to higher efficiency in security tasks. It helps users stay compliant with regulations and supports real-time threat investigation. With intuitive event scheduling, the software elevates event planning and execution through seamless integration and customization options.

What are the key features of SmartEvent Event Management?

Real-time threat detection: Identify and respond to security threats as they occur
Compliance management: Ensure adherence to necessary regulations
Centralized monitoring: Maintain complete oversight of security events
Event scheduling: Plan and organize events efficiently
Customizable reporting: Tailor reports to meet specific needs
Integration capabilities: Seamlessly connect with other platforms
Performance tracking: Monitor the effectiveness of security measures

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced visibility: Improved control over security operations
Increased efficiency: Streamlined security tasks through automation
Reliable performance: Consistent and dependable operation
Better communication: Effective coordination within teams

In specific industries, SmartEvent Event Management can be implemented to streamline security operations, ensuring real-time threat detection and compliance with industry regulations. Its customization options and integration capabilities make it adaptable for various sectors, enhancing event planning and execution in finance, healthcare, and more.

Check Point Software Technologies

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. SmartEvent Event Management

August 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. SmartEvent Event Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. SmartEvent Event Management and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. SmartEvent Event Management report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.