HPE BladeSystem and Dell PowerEdge M [EOL] are leading products in the data center category. HPE BladeSystem appears to have the upper hand in deployment flexibility, while Dell PowerEdge M stands out in remote management capabilities.
Features: HPE BladeSystem offers high reliability, central management solutions, and seamless integration into existing setups, enhancing virtual environments with robust storage and networking features. Dell PowerEdge M provides strong multi-node support, robust processing capabilities, and a scalable infrastructure that supports expansion but may have less flexible networking options.
Room for Improvement: HPE BladeSystem is criticized for its complex management interface and limited parts availability for older models. Dell PowerEdge M users point out occasional lengthy POST times and inconvenient iDRAC processes. Both systems could improve their integration and management capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions receive positive feedback for on-premises deployments, with HPE scoring better for versatility in hybrid and cloud configurations. While HPE's support is inconsistent with longer response times, they ultimately satisfy customers. Dell offers quick and reliable support, with some delays during escalation.
Pricing and ROI: HPE BladeSystem is credited with higher initial costs but provides long-term savings by reducing operational expenses. Dell PowerEdge M is competitively priced with negotiable terms, leading to significant cost savings. Both are valued for their ROI, with HPE excelling in minimizing operational costs and Dell offering scalable solutions at a competitive price.
We utilize AI technology with Dell PowerEdge M through a module known as CloudIQ, which provides automation and takes care of predictive analysis and reporting.
They provide excellent help when needed.
Regarding technical support from Dell, I find them to be one of the best support providers in the industry right now.
I would rate technical support from HPE as an eight on a scale from one to ten.
Regarding scalability, I can scale up to 64 enclosures, and each enclosure can hold around 7 blades.
I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for scalability when we need to contact different vendors for quotes to find competitive offers.
I do not have to call HP support frequently, which indicates its reliability.
There are differences in security configurations, particularly in SNMP and SNMP3, between HP ILO and iDRAC.
In terms of potential room for improvement regarding Dell PowerEdge M, I would want to see something such as dense nodes and additional storage, as well as multiple network connectivity on the blades.
To do any customization, we need to contact HP technical support, and the process is not user-friendly.
In general, there is a 10% to 15% price gap compared to competitors.
Sometimes Dell may be a little costlier, but that is considering the services and solutions we are providing, which can be adjustable.
With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for scalability when we need to contact different vendors for quotes to find competitive offers.
In general, there is a 10% to 15% price gap compared to competitors.
The ease of troubleshooting and managing through remote access, using tools like iDRAC, significantly saves me time.
If the customer is changing their network infrastructure from 1GB or 10GB to 25GB or 400GB, the MX7000 fabric switch can support that.
The integration of storage and networking components within the HPE BladeSystem is quite beneficial as it is easily interoperable if we are using the same system for monitoring with the same software, which eliminates interoperability issues.
The feature I find most valuable is the ease of use.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Dell PowerEdge M | 16.9% |
HPE BladeSystem | 13.7% |
Other | 69.4% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 12 |
Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
Large Enterprise | 10 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 29 |
Midsize Enterprise | 40 |
Large Enterprise | 103 |
Dell PowerEdge M is known for maximizing efficiency with high core and RAM density, supporting virtual environments and ensuring reliable performance and impressive scalability.
Known for its cost-effectiveness, Dell PowerEdge M offers robust performance and extensive management features like iDRAC and OpenManage for centralized monitoring. It provides strong security capabilities and flexible interface options. Key areas for improvement include boot time delays from POST checks and challenges with iDRAC instance, needing better networking and connectivity options including AMD CPUs and Ethernet enhancements. Users highlight the need for improved scalability, VLAN configurations, and caching. Dell PowerEdge M primarily supports applications like server virtualization and data center consolidation, operating effectively in cluster environments like solar power plant data logging.
What are the key features of Dell PowerEdge M?Dell PowerEdge M finds its implementation in critical applications such as server virtualization and compute, addressing wide-ranging workloads from administrative tasks to scientific computing. Organizations leverage its capabilities in virtual machine hosting, hyper-converged infrastructure management, and balanced load handling, enhancing its effectiveness in environments like solar power plant data logging.
HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.