Dataloader.io vs TIBCO BusinessWorks comparison

"he product’s most valuable feature is ease of access."

"I find DataLoader's ability to easily integrate with external keys valuable, which is a bit more challenging with DBM."

"DataLoader is cost-effective since it is free."

"Good TIBCO BusinessWorks features are the admin console and the ability to roll back to the previous version."

"One of the most valuable features is data transformation. We have some legacy systems which are in old technology, like SOAP, whereas the new ones are in REST. So we use BusinessWorks to transform data from one format to another, from SOAP to REST."

"The most important thing is that it is easy for developers to work with."

"BusinessWorks reduces development time, helping developers to focus on business logic."

"I work in operations, so I value BusinessWorks' performance the most."

"It's a great software application for the middleware use cases to connect the front channels to the back ends in a secure and safer way."

"One of the most valuable features is that it's a simple development. It takes a short time to get services to work."

"I like TIBCO BusinessWorks because it has a user-friendly GUI for developing solutions."

"DataLoader has limitations, including constraints with file sizes and transactions."

"We need help with large data migrations. It only works well for a few thousand records or less than a million records."

"Dataloader has limitations, including constraints with file sizes and transactions. Additionally, at times it can be slow, and when integrating DBM, we find it more complex than Dataloader."

"There are multiple plugins which increase the number of product installations."

"The creation of XSDs should be much simpler."

"This solution's cloud could be improved. I don't know whether it was because we didn't have the internal expertise or if it was the product itself, but since they came later—I think only two or three years into the cloud—after many other iPaaS that had been in the cloud for longer, I feel that maybe they haven't matured in terms of the cloud."

"The Business Studio tool can be improved, which is the tool for designing the processes. Improving the Business Studio tool will make this solution more stable. It has a steep learning curve, and it is pretty tough to learn."

"Performance and latency could be enhanced. Additionally, having signaling stack support would be beneficial."

"Challenges with TIBCO BusinessWorks were mainly due to unclear documentation, but these were overcome by referring to comprehensive documents and raising tickets with TIBCO support."

"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."

"Though it is a stable product, if we have an issue with the product, it gets difficult, and it gets really difficult to explain the issue to the support team. Also, it takes a long time to get resolved."

"The product is inexpensive and economical."

"I don't have the prices of the products, but I know that TIBCO is not a cheap solution. I think that this solution is more suitable for large companies because I don't think that small- or medium-sized companies would have the money for this solution. WSO2 has the community version for free, so many of the smaller companies can use it. I'm not sure what the prices are for support, though, so I suppose the support for WSO2 is not cheap either."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"The license is expensive, and I would rate it one out of ten."

"I give the cost of the solution a four out of ten."

"The cost depends on the components required."

"The product is not cheap."

"Licensing scheme is too rigid"

"My understanding is that the licensing is very costly."