HackerOne and CyCognito compete in the security management category. HackerOne appears to have the upper hand with its community-driven approach and competitive pricing, while CyCognito stands out with automated deep asset discovery.
Features: HackerOne offers a collaborative vulnerability platform, tapping into a vast community of ethical hackers. It focuses on community-driven vulnerability detection and provides users with responsive customer support. CyCognito features advanced automated discovery for extensive asset visibility, facilitates thorough threat analysis, and provides automated risk assessments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HackerOne allows for straightforward integration enhanced by community involvement, which simplifies deployment. It provides an interactive user model driven by its active community. CyCognito deployment demands more technical expertise due to its broad scope, offering detailed insights and strong technical support.
Pricing and ROI: HackerOne's competitive setup costs appeal to budget-conscious organizations, with high ROI from efficient vulnerability management. CyCognito may require higher initial investment, yet justifies the expense through its comprehensive automated features and strategic insights that improve long-term security posture.
Legacy security testing approaches may help security teams find and remediate risks on-premises and directly managed infrastructure. But, they are no match for the rapidly expanding attack surface caused by modern, highly distributed IT ecosystems.
CyCognito was founded by veterans of national intelligence agencies who understand how attackers exploit blind spots, and who recognized the need for a radical new approach to threat assessment. Our mission is to build the next-generation security risk assessment product category: solutions that autonomously discover, enumerate, and prioritize each organization’s security risks based upon a global analysis of all external attack surfaces and attack vectors that a real attacker would likely exploit.
We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
