Cybereason XDR vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

Cybereason XDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason XDR

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

22nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

158

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (9th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Cybereason XDR is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.6%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform	3.6%
Cybereason XDR	0.8%
Other	95.6%

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Featured Reviews

Peter Nowak

Business Development Manager for Cybereason at Bechtle

Integration of multiple firewalls enables advanced threat detection

The integration of data from firewalls and Active Directory is most valuable. Cybereason XDR facilitates two-way communication, where the firewall sends data to the Cybereason system, and it can communicate with the firewall to stop unwanted communication. Customers can deal with multiple types of firewalls with ease. The behavioral analytics help detect advanced threats when attackers use existing software. The multilayered protection approach, including NGAV, integrates XDR detection with antivirus to assess and counter threats effectively.

Read full review

Abdullah Al Hadi

Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd

Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies

There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has an investigation feature, which is useful for building storylines."

"The integration of data from firewalls and Active Directory is most valuable."

"Cybereason XDR's most useful feature is the investigation."

"The integration of data from firewalls and Active Directory is most valuable."

"Trellix Endpoint Security seems to do a good job in terms of protecting my infrastructure from malware."

"McAfee EndPoint Security has a lot of good features that work well if they are implemented properly."

"The extendability is great."

"The most valuable features are the adaptive tech on McAfee."

"The initial setup of Trellix Endpoint Security was straightforward."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"A great console with a user-friendly GUI."

"Some of McAfee Endpoint Security's main features are it has benefits over normal conventional antivirus solutions because it works much faster."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

Cons

"Cybereason's customer support could be better."

"There could be more integrations with other data sources like NDR systems."

"Customer service is rated as a five out of ten. When they work and reach the right level, they are helpful, but getting to the right person can be time-consuming."

"The one thing we sometimes have issues with is its integration with other security applications like antiviruses."

"The solution could provide open XDR in addition to EDR."

"The solution's documentation is not streamlined and is in bits and pieces, which should be in a single format."

"The solution could use better updates and fewer bugs."

"It can be quite complicated to learn McAfee Endpoint Security and to feel comfortable with the environment."

"There are more secure featured solutions from McAfee on the market but for smaller companies like ours, they are too expensive."

"The initial setup can be a bit complicated for those unfamiliar with the product."

"The product does not seem to be cloud-native and there are issues with automating it. Automation is not intuitive."

"It didn't work well for some of the use cases. We have different use cases for each entity. Their support is also not good and needs improvement."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheaper than Microsoft Defender. It has a subscription and no standard license."

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."

"It provides good value by striking a balance between cost-effectiveness and feature richness."

"When comparing the solution to others it is a bit expensive. We are on a monthly license."

"The price of this product is good."

"It is reasonably priced."

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."

"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."

"This product is costly."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	67
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	59

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cybereason XDR?

There could be more integrations with other data sources like NDR systems. Additionally, technical support has been slow in recent times. Enabling multifactor authentication has been problematic fo...

What is your primary use case for Cybereason XDR?

I use Cybereason XDR for customers who don't have a SOC or managed SOC yet and want to be protected on more than their desktops. It is especially used in the manufacturing industry, yet not exclusi...

What advice do you have for others considering Cybereason XDR?

I rate Cybereason XDR a nine out of ten. I recommend having hands-on experience and doing some threat hunting to familiarize yourself with the handling.

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Cybereason XDR

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 25% of the time

Compared 24% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 20% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 10% of the time

More Cybereason XDR Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Download Cybereason XDR product report

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Overview

Cybereason is the leader in endpoint protection, offering endpoint detection and response, next-generation antivirus, and managed monitoring services. Founded by elite intelligence professionals born and bred in offense-first hunting, Cybereason gives enterprises the upper hand over cyber adversaries.

Cybereason

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

MOTOROLA MOBILITY

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Cybereason XDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform