Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security comparison

Cybereason and Trend Micro are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Cybereason is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.2, while Trend Micro is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4. Cybereason holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trend Micro’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Trend Micro users who would recommend it.

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Read 21 Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews

3,422 Views
1,923 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Trend Vision One Endpoint S...

Read 131 Trend Vision One Endpoint Security reviews

7,394 Views
4,452 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Trend Vision One Endpoint S...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security and Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response compete in the endpoint security category. Trend Vision One excels in pricing and customer support, while Cybereason is preferred for its features and advanced capabilities.

Features: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers comprehensive threat detection, user-friendly reporting tools, and efficient threat mitigation. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is known for advanced behavioral analytics, automated threat hunting, and proactive threat detection.

Room for Improvement: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security needs improvement in reducing false positives, enhancing integration with third-party tools, and refining user interface. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response could benefit from simplifying the implementation process, enhancing scalability for larger deployments, and improving user training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is noted for straightforward deployment and highly responsive customer support. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response also offers smooth deployment and exceptional customer service with active performance optimization assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is recognized for cost-effectiveness and quicker ROI. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response, though more expensive, offers a long-term ROI with advanced features and extensive security coverage.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

34th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trend Vision One Endpoint S...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

5th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

131

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Compliance (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 0.8%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is 1.8%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

John Trembly

Technical Specialist at Iona Catholic Secondary School

Provides a single dashboard, integrates well, and has predictive machine learning

Microsoft's new Azure Code Signing is causing a lot of issues for us with One Endpoint Security. We currently have two systems in operation, on-prem and SaaS, and many of the agents won't upgrade beyond version B11564 because these newer versions require Azure Code Signing compliance on the endpoint. If we are not up to date with our Windows updates, we don't have this compliance. Irrespective of the Windows version we are running, we have to apply patches to the machines, if the OS is not damaged, to make them compliant. After that, we can upgrade to the latest version of the respective agent. This process also applies to both Deep Security and Workload Security. I have two production servers: one for Windows and another for Mac. These servers are available in both on-premise and SaaS versions. Additionally, I have a test server that is located on-premises. The significant distinction with the SaaS version is the absence of a test server where I can install a new version. This means I can't allow the agents on it to upgrade and then perform testing. In contrast, with the production SaaS version of One Endpoint Security, I have numerous agents transitioning and coming online. It's essential that these agents upgrade to a newer version. Among these agents, there are five or six different versions, not counting the really old ones that have yet to upgrade due to ACS non-compliance. I can't leave the testing phase for an extended period because I still have outdated agents that need to be updated. These agents can't be left hanging while I wait to test the newest version that has just been released. New versions seem to come out every couple of months in the SaaS environment. In the past, when I solely used the on-premises version, I would review security bulletins for the SaaS version to identify any issues. I'm apprehensive about potential future situations involving this, primarily because the majority of our agents now operate on the cloud version. If a problem is discovered, rolling back on those agents would be challenging. It would require careful operation to revert them to a different version. The on-premises version of One Endpoint Security has an update function that allows us to manually update a bunch of servers. For example, if I just turned on a policy, I can force the agents to quickly download the policy and start following the update procedure or update settings. However, this function is not available in the SaaS version. This is because the system cannot communicate with the agent through the firewall. The SaaS version has an automatic update function and an update source entry in the update agents sub-menu, but it does not have a way to force agents to update. This is a problem because we cannot automatically update the agents. We have to manually log in to the machines and give them an update command. Currently, we have no choice but to wait until the agents find the updates themselves.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform."

"Cybereason absolutely enables us to mitigate and isolate on the fly. Our managed detection response telemetry has dropped dramatically since we began using it. It's very top-of-mind. We were running some tabletop exercises and none of the detections were getting triggered by the managed security services provider. So we needed to find a solution that would trigger high-fidelity alerts. That was Cybereason and it dramatically changed our landscape from the detection and response perspective."

"For me, the technical support is good."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"The initial setup is not overly complicated."

"It gives all the information in a clear response."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"It's a stable solution, to date we have not had any issues."

"We have found the reports to be most valuable."

"When comparing to other products the console is much more user-friendly, and it's easy to implement."

"The most valuable aspect is achieving zero attacks and zero data compromise."

"The most valuable features are reporting and where we have the ability to report back and provide information when an item is quarantined or not quarantined."

"The most valuable feature of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is the virtual patching it provides."

"It provides comprehensive visibility into all client logs and seamlessly integrates with other products, such as CM."

"I think this is the best solution in the category of endpoint protection, it's really excellent. It's better than McAfee."

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"Reporting could be a bit more granular so that we had the ability to check regions and countries. I just noticed that, for instance, if I look at our servers, it's either "contained" or it's "not contained". I don't have the option, for instance, to look at countries. It only allows me to look at users as one big group."

"There is room for improvement in the product features related to device control, particularly USB management."

"It initially took some time to deploy."

"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."

"The integration with Microsoft solutions and Microsoft capabilities needs to be improved."

"I would like to see improvements on the operational side, specifically in grouping."

"The reporting feature needs improvement."

"The product's reporting isn't great."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"The solution could improve security. It is important to always keep the organization secure."

"The security features need improvement."

"The console can be better in terms of management and viewing the hierarchy of devices. Currently, setting up the hierarchy OU-wise is a bit cumbersome. It can be made a bit easier. If that can be more user-friendly and easier to manage, it would be great."

"Recently, we had a malware attack and considered looking at other cloud solutions because of this breach."

"Trend Micro Apex One could improve by providing signatureless detection, reducing the agent's needed system resources to increase performance, and enhance further the vulnerability assessment feature. These changes would be very helpful in the future."

"The integration is lacking in Trend Micro Apex One. It does not integrate well with Microsoft p solutions. For example, with Office 365, we have to buy another solution for mail protection. That's why we are assessing Microsoft Defender 365 because we have an email from Microsoft, an endpoint from Microsoft, and we use Windows systems."

"Trend Vision One Endpoint Security should have a DLP (Data loss prevention) module."

"Apex One uses a lot of RAM and other physical resources, and I also don't like the web interface."

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"It is okay. Compared to Sophos, it is a little bit expensive, but it is a good product and it is better than Sophos, for instance. It is equivalent to Trellix. Its cost depends on the country. I am in Turkey, and Trend Micro is not so affordable in Turkey. SMB companies are looking for cheaper products. In Turkey, enterprise customers tend to use Trend Micro, and if they have more money, then they use next-generation antivirus or EPP products such as SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, or Microsoft E5 package."

"Trend Micro Apex One's subscription model is definitely on the expensive side."

"We have the smallest package of Trend Micro Apex One. The full package is expensive, and it was more expensive than we thought."

"When compared to Symantec, Kaspersky, and others the price is higher, they are more expensive."

"It's an annual subscription."

"If I compare Trend Micro Apex One with other solutions there are a few challenges for customers who have do not need more licenses. Sometimes the customers struggle because this product is totally an enterprise solution, and the price for the licenses can be expensive for individuals or small organizations."

"Compared to other products on the market, I think that the pricing is reasonable."

"On a scale of one to ten with ten being the most expensive, Apex One is an eight."

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Educational Organization

48%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

See all answers

What's the difference between Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Micro Apex One?

Trend Micro Deep Security offers a lot of features. It guarantees security for your data center, cloud, and containers - all with a unified and comprehensive SaaS solution and without compromising ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Trend Micro Apex One?

It is updated automatically without much intervention from our side. We can also get some reports easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro Apex One?

The pricing is very high, despite the solution’s capabilities.

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 28% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

Trend Micro Deep Security vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 20% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 19% of the time

Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 5% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

May 2025

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Buyer's Guide

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

April 2025

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report

Download Trend Vision One Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

Trend Micro Apex One, OfficeScan, Trend Micro OfficeScan

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security delivers comprehensive antivirus, data protection, and device management. It offers robust threat detection and is deployable on-premises or via the cloud, making it versatile for endpoint security across organizations.

Emphasizing reliable endpoint security, Trend Vision One guards workstations and servers with extended detection and response features. Its machine learning-driven threat detection offers protection from malware and viruses, including zero-day threats. With seamless updates and automation, it minimizes administrative burdens, making deployment efficient. Criticisms include high resource use during scans and integration complexities, with calls for improved data loss prevention and better encryption. Users see the need for enhanced Linux support and quicker security updates.

What features define Trend Vision One Endpoint Security?

Real-time threat detection: Provides immediate alerts on potential risks.
Virtual patching: Protects against known vulnerabilities without software updates.
Centralized management console: Facilitates efficient device management.
Machine learning: Enhances detection with advanced analytics.
Zero-day threat protection: Guards against unforeseen attacks.
Ransomware detection: Identifies and prevents ransomware incursions.
Automated updates: Ensures systems are protected with the latest safeguards.

Which benefits are crucial in reviews?

Reducing administrative overhead: Automation decreases time spent on routine tasks.
Efficient threat response: Facilitates quick identification and mitigation of risks.
Seamless system updates: Keeps protection up to date without disruptions.
Improving operational efficiency: Integrates smoothly with existing security solutions.

In the finance sector, Trend Vision One is implemented for robust data protection and regulatory compliance. Healthcare providers rely on it for protecting sensitive patient information from cyber threats. Retailers use it for safeguarding payment systems and customer data against breaches, ensuring uninterrupted business operations.

Trend Micro

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, A&W Food Services of Canada, Babou, Beth Israel Deaconess Care Organization (BO), DCI Donor Services, Evalueserve, Gulftainer, Hiroshima Prefectural Government, MEDHOST

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

April 2025

Free Report: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.