CyberArk Secrets Management vs IBM Security Verify Access comparison

CyberArk and IBM are both solutions in the Access Management category. CyberArk is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.3, while IBM is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Additionally, 100% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Secrets Management

Read 5 CyberArk Secrets Management reviews

245 Views
74 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Security Verify Access

Read 7 IBM Security Verify Access reviews

1,570 Views
1,083 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Secrets Management

IBM Security Verify Access

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

IBM Security Verify Access and CyberArk Secrets Management are contenders in the identity and access management category. IBM Security Verify Access stands out for its integration capabilities, whereas CyberArk Secrets Management is superior in advanced security features.

Features: IBM Security Verify Access provides robust multi-factor authentication, adaptive access controls, and comprehensive integration options, making it a strong choice for corporate environments needing versatile authentication methods. CyberArk Secrets Management emphasizes credential protection with password vaults, automatic credential rotation, and robust audit trails, serving environments where advanced secret management is crucial.

Room for Improvement: IBM Security Verify Access could enhance its secrets management capabilities and user interface for improved user experience. Additionally, its setup process can be optimized for quicker integration. CyberArk Secrets Management might benefit from simplified deployment procedures, improved ease of use, and cost reduction in initial setup to appeal to a broader range of enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security Verify Access offers smooth deployment with strong support services, facilitating faster implementation. CyberArk Secrets Management, while requiring more configuration, provides specialized assistance that addresses its solution's complex security demands.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security Verify Access features a competitive pricing model delivering promising ROI through efficient identity management. CyberArk Secrets Management, with higher setup costs, justifies the expense through its specialized security features, offering significant ROI in credential security for high-security environments.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Secrets Management vs. IBM Security Verify Access Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Secrets Management vs. IBM Security Verify Access

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Secrets Management

Ranking in Access Management

19th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Password Managers (16th)

IBM Security Verify Access

Ranking in Access Management

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (14th), Identity Management (IM) (25th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (17th)

Featured Reviews

Rajat-Jain

Senior Member Of Technical Staff at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Helps with compliance and improves operational flexibility

We have had both on-premises and SaaS models. The on-premise setup was a little difficult, but now that it has been moved to the SaaS model, everything is controlled by CyberArk. We just go and do our work. The initial on-premises setup took two weeks because it was an integrated effort. I had to spin up the servers and bring in the CyberArk Secrets Management resource to deploy the scripts. I then had to open networks and firewalls between CyberArk Secrets Management's on-premise servers and the application server. In the initial phase, it took two to three weeks, but it became easier when moving to the SaaS model. In terms of maintenance, it requires patching or upgrades, which happens one day in a month. If there is a failure, we have to roll back and try once again, which takes more time, but if everything goes smoothly, there is three to five hours of downtime.

Read full review

Jared Ochieng

Information Technology Security Specialist at infoark

Offers multiple authentication methods like tokens and one-time passwords

The authentication process with IBM Security Verify Access is good and is considered one of the best identity and access management solutions. It helps with multi-factor authentication. It offers multiple authentication methods like tokens and one-time passwords, enhancing security. It also includes features like password vaults and single sign-on, streamlining the access process for remote and local users across different solutions. The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options. The policy control feature allows you to set authentication measures and policies for your organization's identity governance. This feature helps create standardized policies and organize them into groups based on departments or specific needs. It simplifies access management for both administrators and users. IBM Security Verify Access can be integrated with almost any solution using APIs. The time required for integration depends on whether the solution is out of the box or custom. Out-of-the-box solutions can be integrated quickly, typically within a few days or hours, while custom solutions may require additional steps and take longer to integrate.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With CyberArk Secrets Management, we were able to resolve the automatic change of the passwords based on timelines. We were also able to retrieve the passwords in an encrypted format by utilizing the CyberArk platform, which was not provided to us by UiPath."

"It's vital for effectively managing and securing my credentials."

"The granular controls of CyberArk Secrets Management are very niche in their development and very secure from the overall secret management perspective, offering high-level functionalities where we have control over user access, which can be tracked and monitored."

"The automatic rotation of the password is the top feature."

"One of the most important features for us is the system's performance, particularly its speed of retrieving secrets."

"The audit trails have been extremely important for us in helping our organization meet regulatory requirements."

"CyberArk Secrets Management is a critical solution for strengthening our security posture."

"CyberArk's support team is knowledgeable and helpful, consistently responding on time."

"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security."

"From the integration point of view, it supports SAML, OIDC, and OAuth. For legacy applications that don't have support for SAML and other new protocols, it provides single sign-on access to end-users. From the integration compatibility point of view, it is highly capable."

"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."

"The most valuable feature of IBM Security Access Manager, at least for my company, is multi-factor authentication. That's the only feature my company is using. The solution works well and has no glitches. IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."

"Its stability and UI are most valuable."

"The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options."

"It's a good solution for identification and access management."

Cons

"We did not have a good experience with technical support because their numerous processes caused delays in engaging, leading to project delays or issues with production."

"There is room for improvement with better documentation and less need for CyberArk Secrets Management personnel to assist us with their presence."

"Improvements for CyberArk Secrets Management include enhanced documentation with more use cases and step-by-step integration guides."

"Implementing it and ensuring seamless password rotations present challenges."

"Implementation was complex and required professional services."

"The password search feature and integration between different vaults could be enhanced. For instance, when updating passwords in both lower and higher environment vaults, improvement is required in search and upgrade functions."

"We occasionally experience incidents that delay password injection back into the script."

"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain."

"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."

"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."

"The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."

"The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial."

"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area. OIDC is a third-party integration that we do with the cloud platforms, and OAuth is an authorization mechanism for allowing a user having an account with Google or any other provider to access an application. Organizations these days are looking for just-in-time provisioning use cases, but IBM Security Access Manager is not very mature for such use cases. There are only a few applications that can be integrated, and this is where this product is lagging. However, in terms of configuration and single sign-on mechanisms, it is a great product."

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product. It is not easy to tweak the functionality. It is challenging to change the out-of-the-box functionality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is in the middle. It is neither very cheap nor very expensive, so I would place it in the middle."

"CyberArk Secrets Management has a moderate pricing structure based on a per-tenant licensing model rather than a per-user account model like their PAM solution."

"The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."

"The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."

"It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

23%

Insurance Company

14%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Secrets Management?

One of the CPL licenses costs around 60 to 80k GBP.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Secrets Management?

The tool is very good, but the commercialized training, which is paid, could be improved. Regularizing those trainings as part of a global alliance between the customer, SI partner, and CyberArk wo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CyberArk Secrets Management?

The main use case for CyberArk Secrets Management is application integrations and the CI and CD part. In CyberArk Secrets Management, there are a variety of tools that they cover, one being the Cre...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Security Access Manager?

The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via ema...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Security Access Manager?

The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Security Access Manager?

I rate the product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

HashiCorp Vault vs CyberArk Secrets Management

Compared 100% of the time

More CyberArk Secrets Management Competitors

Oracle Access Manager vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 12% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 8% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Security Verify Access Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Secrets Management

August 2025

Download CyberArk Secrets Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

July 2025

Download IBM Security Verify Access product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM

Overview

CyberArk Secrets Management offers comprehensive security for managing sensitive information, addressing crucial needs in secure storage, access, and control of credentials across IT environments.

CyberArk Secrets Management focuses on ensuring the secure handling of sensitive enterprise data, offering a robust infrastructure for credentials and secrets management. Designed for organizations that need high levels of security, it provides efficiency in automating access controls and compliance. Its features are tailored to integrate seamlessly with existing IT frameworks, facilitating a secure and scalable approach to managing critical information across complex infrastructures. CyberArk's approach addresses both security and operational efficiency.

What features make CyberArk Secrets Management essential?

Enhanced Security Controls: Allows detailed configuration of access policies to safeguard sensitive data.
Automated Credential Rotation: Automatically rotates credentials to minimize the risk of security breaches.
Integrated Audit Trails: Provides comprehensive tracking and reporting to ensure compliance and accountability.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from CyberArk Secrets Management?

Risk Reduction: Minimizes potential exposure to data breaches through advanced security measures.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines access management tasks, reducing manual overhead and errors.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps maintain adherence to industry standards and regulations, reducing the risk of fines.

CyberArk Secrets Management is widely implemented across sectors like finance, healthcare, and government, focusing on industries where data sensitivity and compliance are critical. Its application helps organizations mitigate risks and enhance data governance, proving invaluable in environments where trust and security are paramount.

CyberArk

IBM Security Verify Access is a complete authorization and network security policy management solution. It provides end-to-end protection of resources over geographically dispersed intranets and extranets.Provides a wide range of built-in authenticators and supports external authenticators.Provides permit and deny decisions for protected resources requests in the secure domain through the authorization API.Manages secure access to private internal network-based resources by using the public Internet's broad connectivity and ease of use with a corporate firewall system.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

POST Luxembourg

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Secrets Management vs. IBM Security Verify Access

July 2025

Free Report: CyberArk Secrets Management vs. IBM Security Verify Access

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Secrets Management vs. IBM Security Verify Access and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Secrets Management vs. IBM Security Verify Access report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.