We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and GitLab based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."
"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"The dashboard and interface make it easy to use."
"It scales well."
"The solution's service delivery model is fantastic."
"GitLab offers a good interface for doing code reviews between two colleagues."
"The most valuable feature of GitLab is the automatic merging of code."
"I have had no problem with the stability of the solution."
"CI/CD is valuable for me."
"GitLab is being used as a repository for our codebase and it is a one stop DevOps tool we use in our team."
"I would like to see better customer support."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"It would be better if there weren't any outages. There are occasions where we usually see a lot of outages using GitLab. It happens at least once a week or something like that. Whatever pipelines you're running, to check the logs, you need to have a different set of tools like Argus or something like that. If you have pipelines running on GitLab, you need a separate service deployed to view the logs, which is kind of a pain. If the logs can be used conveniently on GitLab, that would be definitely helpful. I'm not talking about the CI/CD pipelines but the back-end services and microservices deployed over GitLab. To view the logs for those microservices, you need to have separate log viewers, which is kind of a pain."
"There is room for improvement in GitLab Agents."
"I don't really like the new Kubernetes integration because it is pretty focused on the on-premise environment, but we're in a hybrid environment."
"Their RBAC is role-based access, which is fine but not very good."
"Expand features to match other tools such as a static code analysis tool so third-party integrations are not required."
"The solution could be faster."
"As GitLab is not perfect, what needs improvement in the solution is the Wiki feature of the groups or the repertories because currently, it's not searchable by default. You'll need an indexing service such as Elasticsearch to make it searchable, and that requires too much work, so for me, it's the main feature that should be improved in GitLab. In the next version of the solution, from the top of my head, the documentation could be improved. Besides the Wiki, it would be good if there's documentation that would be automatically generated based on the code repository. In other words, there should be some tutorials from GitLab for developers in the next release."
"The solution should again offer an on-premises deployment option."
CucumberStudio is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 9 reviews while GitLab is ranked 10th in Rapid Application Development Software with 70 reviews. CucumberStudio is rated 8.0, while GitLab is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". CucumberStudio is most compared with GitHub CoPilot, whereas GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, SonarQube, AWS CodePipeline and Tekton.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
