CoreOS Clair vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 comparison

Red Hat and ExtraHop Networks are both solutions in the Container Security category. Red Hat is ranked #27 with an average rating of 9.0, while ExtraHop Networks is ranked #28 with an average rating of 9.0. Red Hat holds a 0.5% mindshare in Container Security, compared to ExtraHop Networks’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ExtraHop Networks users who would recommend it.

CoreOS Clair

Read 2 CoreOS Clair reviews

516 Views
121 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Read 3 ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 reviews

164 Views
16 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CoreOS Clair

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

CoreOS Clair and ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 compete in the cybersecurity space, with a focus on container security and network detection and response (NDR) respectively. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 seems to have the upper hand due to its more comprehensive features for broader network security needs.

Features: CoreOS Clair offers continuous vulnerability scanning, detailed reporting, and seamless integration with container environments. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 provides real-time detection, machine learning analytics, and complete network visibility.

Room for Improvement: CoreOS Clair could improve by enhancing integration capabilities, increasing scan speed, and expanding documentation. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 could benefit from better reporting customization, more intuitive configuration settings, and improved user interface design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CoreOS Clair is straightforward to deploy within container environments but has mixed feedback on customer service responsiveness. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is praised for its deployment in diverse environments and reliable customer service, offering a more user-friendly experience and consistent support.

Pricing and ROI: CoreOS Clair's pricing is more approachable for startups and small enterprises, showing good ROI in container-specific security. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360, though considered more expensive, delivers superior ROI with extensive network security features, justifying the higher cost for larger enterprises needing extensive network protection.

To learn more, read our detailed CoreOS Clair vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CoreOS Clair vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CoreOS Clair

Ranking in Container Security

27th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Ranking in Container Security

28th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (17th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (10th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of CoreOS Clair is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Felipe Giffu

Red Hat Solution Architect at Seprol Computadores e Sistemas

An operational system, similar to Linux where you can run your applications inside containers

With CoreOS, you can run your applications inside containers. For example, if you have an application that needs to run on Linux, you can create and install a container. However, it's important to note that you don't install CoreOS inside a container; CoreOS is the host operating system that manages containers. When you mentioned using Nacula as part of your CI/CD pipeline, it means your application is deployed and managed automatically through the CI/CD process. Containers are used to deploy your application within this pipeline, but CoreOS does not run inside these containers. Instead, CoreOS is the base operating system that supports and manages these containers.

Read full review

Maksym Toporkov

Head of Research And Development at Quipu GmbH

A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives

The NDR feature analyzes network traffic, creating records with connection details. While these records offer insights, there's a limitation in investigating payloads directly. ExtraHop provides an option for an additional server to save payloads, but its temporary storage has constraints. Unlike some competitors, it lacks an automatic payload-saving feature for each detection, presenting an improvement opportunity. Suggested enhancement involves the main sensor prompting payload storage for specific detections, streamlining the investigation process, and contributing to a more efficient workflow. A drawback includes packet storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CoreOS Clair's best feature is detection accuracy."

"With CoreOS, you can run your applications inside containers. For example, if you have an application that needs to run on Linux, you can create and install a container. However, it's important to note that you don't install CoreOS inside a container; CoreOS is the host operating system that manages containers."

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

"It is scalable."

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

Cons

"An area for improvement is that CoreOS Clair doesn't provide information about the location of vulnerabilities it detects."

"It can be improved in its support response. They usually take up to seven days to resolve the issue."

"There needs to be more support."

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CoreOS Clair is open-source and free of charge."

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CoreOS Clair?

If you work with CoreOS or OpenShift, you don't need to pay for CoreOS separately. When you pay for OpenShift, you get CoreOS included, so you don't need to pay for the operating system separately....

See all answers

What needs improvement with CoreOS Clair?

It can be improved in its support response. They usually take up to seven days to resolve the issue.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CoreOS Clair?

We use the tool to manage and secure the event file system. CoreOS Clair is an operational system that is very similar to Linux and offers benefits to other Linux operating systems. One major advan...

See all answers

What do you like most about ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

I recommend prioritizing demos over POCs when engaging with vendors. Organizing POCs involves significant time and resource investments for both parties. Instead, invest time in multiple demo sessi...

See all answers

Comparisons

JFrog Xray vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 23% of the time

Snyk vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 19% of the time

Trivy vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 19% of the time

Tenable.io Container Security vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 17% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 14% of the time

More CoreOS Clair Competitors

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 29% of the time

Corelight vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 18% of the time

Wiz vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 17% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 15% of the time

Forescout Platform vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 13% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Container Security

June 2025

Download CoreOS Clair product report

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

June 2025

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Also Known As

No data available

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

Overview

Clair is an open source project for the static analysis of vulnerabilities in appc and docker containers.

Vulnerability data is continuously imported from a known set of sources and correlated with the indexed contents of container images in order to produce lists of vulnerabilities that threaten a container. When vulnerability data changes upstream, the previous state and new state of the vulnerability along with the images they affect can be sent via webhook to a configured endpoint. All major components can be customized programmatically at compile-time without forking the project.

Red Hat

Cloud is where your business operates, where it innovates, how it enables employees, and how it connects with customers. Adversaries know this, and that's why attacks against cloud assets in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS environments are increasing. With Reveal(x) 360, you can mitigate the blast radius of advanced threats like ransomware and supply chain attacks with unified security across multicloud and hybrid environments in a single management pane.

ExtraHop Networks

Sample Customers

eBay, Veritas, Verizon, SalesForce

Wizards of the Coast

Buyer's Guide

CoreOS Clair vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

June 2025

Free Report: CoreOS Clair vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Find out what your peers are saying about CoreOS Clair vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CoreOS Clair vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.