

Control-M and webMethods.io are prominent in workload automation and integration solutions. Based on a feature-rich evaluation, Control-M outperforms in environments requiring robust batch processing, particularly with AS400, whereas webMethods.io is more proficient in offering a comprehensive integration platform for business processes.
Features: Control-M is known for its extensive integrations and cross-platform management, particularly excelling in environments like AS400. It boasts advanced batch scheduling and supports various platforms through Control Modules. webMethods.io offers an intuitive interface with strong application and process integration capabilities, supporting a wide range of integrations such as B2B communications and APIs.
Room for Improvement: Control-M could enhance its reporting tools and provide more flexibility in output analysis. Users have also expressed a need for improved cost management. webMethods.io users seek better documentation, enhanced API management, and cost reduction for additional components.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both platforms offer flexible deployment options suitable for hybrid and on-premises setups. Control-M is scalable but complex for smaller environments, with technical support that may lag during complex issues. webMethods.io is praised for cloud support but receives mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M is seen as expensive, with costs rising with the number of jobs; however, users acknowledge long-term ROI with operational efficiency. webMethods.io offers flexible enterprise-focused pricing, yet its licensing structure is complex. Users value its comprehensive feature set in integrations, appreciating the perceived value over time.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
An incident portal is available where we can raise tickets and based on priority, they reply.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
Whenever more resources are needed, they become available automatically without any human interference.
If any webMethods.io product is installed on-premises and a company wants to scale its application, either vertical scaling or horizontal scaling is needed.
Vertically, scalability is fine, however, I have not expanded horizontally with the product yet.
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
There are some issues like the tool hanging or the need for additional jars when exposing web services.
We provide support to our clients, and the minimum calls I receive are for webMethods.io; it's very stable.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
webMethods.io lacks advanced monitoring and analytics capabilities, so my customers need to use something additional.
When comparing the license cost and request per minute cost, webMethods.io needs to address that.
A special discount of at least 50% for old customers would allow us to expand our services and request more resources.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
Regarding the pricing and licensing of webMethods.io, I don't think it's expensive when compared with the features.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
It is easy to integrate Control-M with technologies for data ops or DevOps processes as things change, and it is not complex compared to other workload automation tools available in the market.
It facilitates the exposure of around 235 services through our platform to feed various government entities across the entire country.
If we want to make a REST API, SOAP, REST, or any other type, all kinds of things are put in one box and we can make anything we want to.
I believe data transformation is exceptional in webMethods.io because they have an online database that can cache the database online.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 4.2% |
| webMethods.io | 2.1% |
| Other | 93.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 123 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 64 |
Control-M by BMC is engineered to manage hybrid cloud workflows, offering orchestration capabilities starting at $29,000 annually. Aimed at helping growing teams, it efficiently supports cross-environment scheduling and automation needs.
Control-M offers robust cross-platform scheduling, automation, and integration with applications such as SAP and Informatica. Users appreciate its ease of use with a graphical interface, centralized management, and monitoring capabilities. Advanced features, including Managed File Transfer, automated error handling, and real-time alerts, enhance productivity. The ability to unify workflows and support diverse environments makes Control-M a trusted tool in many sectors. While improvements in reporting flexibility and API integration with tools like ServiceNow are needed, addressing performance issues during upgrades could enhance its value. Offering improved support for new technologies and cloud environments is beneficial, with cost-effectiveness being a consideration.
What are the key features of Control-M?Control-M is leveraged in industries like finance for enterprise scheduling and data management, supporting mainframe, Linux, Unix, Windows, and cloud platforms. It contributes to workflow orchestration and workload automation, improving operational efficiency and enhancing IT infrastructure across those environments.
webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.