Conga Composer vs Hyland Perceptive Content comparison

Conga and Hyland are both solutions in the Document Management Software category. Conga is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while Hyland is ranked #14. Conga holds a 2.4% mindshare in DMS, compared to Hyland’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Conga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Hyland users who would recommend it.

Conga Composer

Read 19 Conga Composer reviews

1,568 Views
784 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyland Perceptive Content

Read 4 Hyland Perceptive Content reviews

1,071 Views
632 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Conga Composer

Hyland Perceptive Content

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Conga Composer and Hyland Perceptive Content based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Document Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Conga Composer vs. Hyland Perceptive Content Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Conga Composer vs. Hyland Perceptive Content

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Conga Composer

Ranking in Document Management Software

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Document Automation Software (1st)

Hyland Perceptive Content

Ranking in Document Management Software

14th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Document Management Software category, the mindshare of Conga Composer is 2.4%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hyland Perceptive Content is 3.0%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Document Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Conga Composer	2.4%
Hyland Perceptive Content	3.0%
Other	94.6%

Document Management Software

Featured Reviews

Skumar Skumar

Salesforce Application Support Specialist at Vectra AI

Document creation has become faster and more accurate but complex templates still need improvement

In terms of improvements for Conga Composer, we did start seeing a lot of requests related to customization, which were initially difficult. As people got to know that it's very easy to customize it, we started to get those more and more, and we saw fewer errors. Earlier, there were many requests to manually adjust the contract value, which was not possible with the CPQ quote documents. With Conga Composer, we can customize it to some level. For exception cases, we can modify the template and generate the contract in a way they want it. While we did not record any metrics, looking at the overall tickets and the reduction in errors we used to see, I think it has improved efficiency by a lot, and our stakeholders agree. However, I would say that despite being easy to set up these templates, there are limitations around looping. Some functionalities break when dealing with large templates, around 30 to 40 pages long. We jumped on their support, but we could not come to a resolution, so we ended up reducing the overall complexity of our template. I think Conga Composer could improve its adoption for Conga Composer Sign. Right now, the adoption is not very great. People use Conga Composer mainly for document generation and then go separately for DocuSign. To get a better hold of the market, Conga should definitely invest more into Conga Composer Sign.

Read full review

it_user588597

Project Accountant at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Once a document is scanned, you can neither edit it nor change its location.

I would like it to have more functions, like Bluebeam. It can be improved so that we can edit the file that got scanned into the system. If we scan the document to the wrong place, we can’t change it. As an example, if something was scanned as a reference, but should be an invoice, you cannot change it afterwards. I think it should have more functions that will allow us to edit the file in ImageNow -- such as adding pages, deleting pages. I also think it should have more hot keys (maybe I just don’t know there are) for easier “route forward”, “view next item”, so I don’t have to use my mouse. There is also a question that came up when I was using it recently, why do we need both “properties” and “forms”? If we index the document in Forms, it will take a long time for it to move to another queue and show the info. If we index it in Properties, it will update immediately. My question is why do we need both? Can’t we just put info in Forms and it will work just like Properties? It is time-consuming to put info in both pages. If the invoice is out of balance, maybe there should be a function that stops it being routed forward. If we route it by accident, it takes time for the approver to reject and routed back. If we can catch it in the first place and fix it when there is a warning sign. I know that there will be a red message saying “out of balance”, but it doesn’t always show up. Is it possible for us to “recall” the routed item? Just like recalling an email that you accidentally sent out. Can we make the Notes section working like a sticky note so it shows name/date, shows the most recent message on top. Sticky note is hard to read (too small) and easily get missed as people put it anywhere. We use notes section for every invoice. We often put a lot of messages there and it gets messy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the Conga email template creation and the document template creation features very useful."

"I like that Conga Composer allows for the generation of PDFs according to specific requirements by creating templates and pulling all the information added into those fields."

"It's quite simple."

"Conga Composer helps to create documents faster and saves time."

"Conga Composer offers extensive customization and flexibility, that allows us to create documents that perfectly align with our branding and specific business requirements."

"What I like about Conga Composer is that it's much easier than Salesforce's native templating. It's simple to add merge fields, write queries to pull data and access up to four levels of related objects. This makes it very comfortable to get all the needed data into templates."

"As an implementer, what stands out for me is that I've been on it for more than ten years now, so I kind of saw some change in the UI, and it's very nice."

"The initial setup of Conga Composer is easy."

More Conga Composer pros

"There are no lost documents, and everyone can see them based on security clearance."

"I like the ability to have workflows."

"If you want to go paperless, this is a great product."

"Customizability that the product gives to make the end user happy."

Cons

"One downside of Conga Composer is that it requires integration with other tools for the signing process. Apart from that, I find nothing major to be improved."

"Conga is getting more and more expensive."

"The biggest area where Conga needs improvement is its documentation. The documentation is good but not up to par with other platforms like Salesforce, which has extensive documentation and a helpful community."

"Honestly, when I was a consultant, Conga Composer was okay, but then when you went a bit outside and wanted to take Conga Sign, which was called Conga Sign back then, but maybe they changed the name now, all those things were getting very expensive."

"If there could be a preview option available directly in the application for testing templates instead of having to download and test them manually, it would save time."

"However, it is not user-friendly. The UI is a little confusing."

"For newcomers to the platform, the removal of certain suggestions in recent releases can be a pain area."

"The debugging skills could be improved as we need to stay alert for issues."

More Conga Composer cons

"Bar Code OCR ICR."

"From my understanding, ImageNow licenses are not compatible with laptop computers (at least not with the one that I have). Therefore, if I have a PDF on my screen, in order to get it into ImageNow, I have to either email it to someone with a license, who can print directly to ImageNow, or print it out and have someone at a scanning station, scan it in and then link it to a student’s record."

"It will stop working if you are in the system for too long."

"Too many companies/products have been purchased by Perceptive over the past few years with what feels like little development on currently owned products."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not cheap, but it's not overly expensive either."

"I think the tool costs around six dollars per user."

"Regarding pricing, I believe it’s around fifty dollars, but I’m not entirely sure. Overall, I find the pricing reasonable and am quite satisfied with the product. The value we get from it justifies the cost, as it requires minimal maintenance and is straightforward to use. The functionality it provides aligns well with the investment."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Document Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Conga Composer?

Not Sure, As i implemented the Quote Documents as per business need but client directly buy it for salesforce

See all answers

What needs improvement with Conga Composer?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Conga Composer?

One of the main use cases for Conga Composer would be to generate quote documents. We had different types of quote documents in our business process, so we used different kinds of Conga Composer te...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SS&C Blue Prism vs Conga Composer

Compared 12% of the time

Box - Intelligent Content Management vs Conga Composer

Compared 10% of the time

DocuWare vs Conga Composer

Compared 8% of the time

DocuSign Gen vs Conga Composer

Compared 7% of the time

Formstack Documents vs Conga Composer

Compared 7% of the time

More Conga Composer Competitors

Hyland OnBase vs Hyland Perceptive Content

Compared 14% of the time

Box - Intelligent Content Management vs Hyland Perceptive Content

Compared 11% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland Perceptive Content

Compared 10% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland Perceptive Content

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Content Management vs Hyland Perceptive Content

Compared 9% of the time

More Hyland Perceptive Content Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Conga Composer

August 2026

Download Conga Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

Document Management Software

July 2026

Download Hyland Perceptive Content product report

Also Known As

Conga

ImageNow

Overview

Conga Composer offers a powerful document generation tool with seamless Salesforce integration and dynamic data merging, allowing users to create customized templates for efficient workflows.

Featuring an intuitive interface, Conga Composer streamlines document creation through automation, reducing manual tasks and enhancing accuracy. Integrating with Salesforce, it supports dynamic data merging and customizable templates for Word and Excel. E-signature incorporation and multilingual support provide added functionality. Despite its capabilities, users note concerns over cost, documentation depth, and integration challenges beyond Salesforce. Improvements in template management, user guidance, and debugging support could enhance its usability.

What are the key features?

Intuitive Interface: User-friendly design simplifies document creation.
Seamless Salesforce Integration: Allows for smooth data merging and document generation within Salesforce.
Customizable Templates: Provides flexibility with Word and Excel templates.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks and enhances accuracy in workflows.
E-signature Support: Facilitates digital signing processes.
Multilingual Functionality: Supports multiple languages for broad applicability.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Increased Efficiency: Automation and dynamic data merging enhance productivity.
Improved Accuracy: Reduces errors in document creation with customizable templates.
Streamlined Workflows: Simplifies processes through integration with platforms like Salesforce.
Enhanced Functionality: Offers flexibility with e-signatures and multilingual support.

Conga Composer is widely applied in sectors like healthcare and finance, automating document creation for invoices, proposals, and reports. It integrates seamlessly with DocuSign for e-signatures, focusing on improving document accuracy and customization for different applications.

Conga

Hyland Perceptive Content provides enterprises with a robust platform for document and process management, helping organizations streamline workflows and enhance efficiency.

Targeting document management excellence, Hyland Perceptive Content excels in streamlining enterprise processes. It allows users to securely capture, store, and retrieve content, facilitating efficient workflow automation. Its adaptable architecture supports collaboration, compliance, and integration with existing systems, making it a trusted choice for businesses seeking seamless document management experiences.

What are the key features of Hyland Perceptive Content?

Document Capture: Efficiently captures and indexes documents for quick retrieval.
Workflow Automation: Automates document-centric tasks to enhance productivity.
Content Storage: Offers secure and organized storage for all documents.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with existing systems to unify information management.
Access Control: Ensures content security with customizable user access levels.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Reviews highlight time-saving through automation features.
Cost Reduction: Users point to decreased overhead due to streamlined processes.
Compliance Support: Assists in maintaining industry-specific compliance standards.
Enhanced Collaboration: Users appreciate the ease of sharing and collaboration capabilities.

Hyland Perceptive Content is tailored to meet industry-specific needs, integrating seamlessly in sectors such as healthcare, financial services, and government operations. It supports compliance requirements while enhancing operational efficiency, proving especially beneficial in environments dealing with high volumes of documents. For instance, in healthcare, it improves patient record management, while in financial services, it optimizes loan processing workflows, contributing to overall productivity.

Hyland

Sample Customers

Arkus, CollegeTracks, Colorado Creative Industries, Davies Office, Delta Air, Depersico, Diagnostic Innovations, Digital Dolphin, Finnzymes

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Conga Composer vs. Hyland Perceptive Content

August 2026

Free Report: Conga Composer vs. Hyland Perceptive Content

Find out what your peers are saying about Conga Composer vs. Hyland Perceptive Content and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Conga Composer vs. Hyland Perceptive Content report.

See our list of best Document Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Document Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.