CloverETL vs SharePlex comparison

Javlin and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Javlin is ranked #57, while Quest Software is ranked #49. Javlin holds a 0.8% mindshare in DI, compared to Quest Software’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Javlin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

CloverETL

Read 2 CloverETL reviews

1,146 Views
699 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePlex

Read 5 SharePlex reviews

1,991 Views
1,374 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloverETL

SharePlex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

SharePlex and CloverETL are competitive products in the data integration landscape. SharePlex appears to have the upper hand in terms of cost-effectiveness and customer support, while CloverETL distinguishes itself with advanced features for complex integration needs.

Features: SharePlex focuses on real-time database replication, seamless integration with various databases, and ease of use for basic tasks. CloverETL offers powerful transformations, extensive customization options, and ideal configuration for complex workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SharePlex is recognized for its straightforward installation process, providing smooth deployment and comprehensive support. CloverETL requires more initial configuration but offers flexibility in diverse environments. SharePlex's customer service is noted for efficiency, while CloverETL's support is responsive, albeit with a learning curve during implementation.

Pricing and ROI: SharePlex provides cost-effective solutions with favorable ROI, making it attractive for smaller and medium-sized applications. CloverETL has higher initial setup costs, but justifies its expense with capabilities for complex data management, offering a tailored ROI for resource-heavy applications.

To learn more, read our detailed CloverETL vs. SharePlex Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. SharePlex

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL

Ranking in Data Integration

57th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Visualization (34th)

SharePlex

Ranking in Data Integration

49th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of CloverETL is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePlex is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SharePlex	0.9%
CloverETL	0.8%
Other	98.3%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

it_user856614

Lead Programmer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them, however we run out heap space even with a high allocation

Flexibility: We can bring in data from multiple sources, e.g., databases, text files, JSON, email, XML, etc. This has been very helpful Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility. Server features for scheduler: It is…

Read full review

Kristopher Wells

Oracle DBA at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

It reduces the downtime and migration time exponentially

I would rate SharePlex's high availability, and disaster recovery features highly. It works as advertised in terms of rapid fill-over and switch-over opportunities. It reduces the migration time for a multi-terabyte database to an hour or less because it performs real-time replication. SharePlex reduces downtime and migration time exponentially. Something that could take 12 to 24 hours is cut down to one to two hours. By the time you start to migrate, the only remaining replication is a slight difference in data from the point when SharePlex has shut down, and the application has to also switch over to the new database. It allowed the company to replicate data more transparently. Some of the business executives probably don't even know it's there. It works 100 percent of the time, with little downtime or problems. It provides what is needed. There's little concern about whether or not it functions. It's allowed the company to achieve its objectives with its clients, reducing and minimizing downtime for substantial migrations and upgrades. It can reduce hardware and storage costs, but my company doesn't utilize it with high-availability architecture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."

"Familiar, intuitive GUI coming from a Java development background, in-depth, descriptive, and well-laid-out documentation, responsive support through forums directly from Clover staff, a wealth of customizable pre-defined components, descriptive logging for error messages, and ease of install with a light footprint make it very effective to use."

"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."

"No dependence on native language and ease of use."

"We switched to CloverETL because of its flexibility to connect to various data sources and no dependence on native language and ease of use."

"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."

"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

"There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target."

"The core replication and its performance, which is by far the fastest, along with the way it handles replication to multiple targets with basic filtering and from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"SharePlex has been a good fit for us because it was not as expensive compared to GoldenGate, it was stable compared to AWS DMS, and it was a good product for what we were looking for and within our budget too."

"I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool."

"The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent."

"It works 100 percent of the time, with little downtime or problems."

More SharePlex pros

Cons

"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."

"Needs easier automated failure recovery, more and more intuitive auto-generated or filled-in code for components, and easier or more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"Its documentation could be improved."

"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"The reporting features need improvement."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication."

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market."

More SharePlex cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

27%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 16% of the time

ViaSQL by Adaptigent vs CloverETL

Compared 12% of the time

SSIS vs CloverETL

Compared 11% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs CloverETL

Compared 10% of the time

SAS Visual Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 9% of the time

More CloverETL Competitors

Oracle GoldenGate vs SharePlex

Compared 13% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs SharePlex

Compared 8% of the time

SSIS vs SharePlex

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

More SharePlex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

March 2026

Download CloverETL product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePlex

March 2026

Download SharePlex product report

Also Known As

No data available

Dell SharePlex, SharePlex

Overview

CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.

Javlin

SharePlex delivers robust database replication and migration capabilities, emphasizing performance, synchronization, and data integrity management. Supporting high availability and real-time data syncing, it serves organizations handling vast transaction volumes, especially in IoT data processing.

SharePlex offers reliable data transfer and efficient multi-target replication. Its features like Compare and Repair utilities assist in maintaining data consistency. With PEP fostering scalability for large transactions, it caters to businesses aiming to cut down migration windows and minimize outages. Users employ SharePlex in real-time syncing and failover scenarios across data centers, crucial for handling extensive transaction data during migrations or upgrades.

What are SharePlex's key features?

Core Replication: Ensures reliable data synchronization across multiple targets.
Data Integrity Management: Maintains accuracy during reading and writing processes.
Compare and Repair Utilities: Facilitate data consistency checks and fixes.
PEP: Enhances performance for large transaction volumes.

Why consider SharePlex for your database needs?

Scalability: Supports large-scale transactions with efficiency.
Minimized Downtime: Provides continuous data availability during operations.
Business Continuity: Enables seamless failover and data center transitions.
Real-time Syncing: Supports time-sensitive data processing requirements.

Organizations in sectors like finance and telecommunications implement SharePlex to maintain uninterrupted operations and ensure quick recovery times. By facilitating database migrations to cloud platforms like AWS, they achieve reduced downtime and enhanced operational efficiency, catering to the rigorous demands of data-driven industries.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA

Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. SharePlex

March 2026

Free Report: CloverETL vs. SharePlex

Find out what your peers are saying about CloverETL vs. SharePlex and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloverETL vs. SharePlex report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.