CloverETL vs Qlik Replicate comparison

Javlin and Qlik are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Javlin is ranked #57, while Qlik is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0. Javlin holds a 0.8% mindshare in DI, compared to Qlik’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Javlin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

CloverETL

Read 2 CloverETL reviews

1,146 Views
699 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Replicate

Read 18 Qlik Replicate reviews

4,009 Views
2,927 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloverETL

Qlik Replicate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Replicate and CloverETL compete in the data integration category, each having unique strengths. Qlik Replicate has an advantage in real-time data movement due to its efficient data replication, while CloverETL is favored for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Qlik Replicate supports change data capture, low-latency replication, and compatibility with multiple data sources. CloverETL provides extensive data transformation capabilities, flexible data manipulation, and detailed control over processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloverETL offers modular deployment for customization, though requiring more initial setup. Qlik Replicate features intuitive setup for quick operational start and provides responsive customer support for fast issue resolution, while CloverETL offers comprehensive documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Replicate involves higher upfront costs but achieves fast ROI with operational efficiencies and reduced maintenance. CloverETL presents flexible pricing, appealing to varying organizational scales, achieving ROI through powerful processing.

To learn more, read our detailed CloverETL vs. Qlik Replicate Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. Qlik Replicate

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL

Ranking in Data Integration

57th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Visualization (34th)

Qlik Replicate

Ranking in Data Integration

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of CloverETL is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Replicate is 1.6%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qlik Replicate	1.6%
CloverETL	0.8%
Other	97.6%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

it_user856614

Lead Programmer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them, however we run out heap space even with a high allocation

Flexibility: We can bring in data from multiple sources, e.g., databases, text files, JSON, email, XML, etc. This has been very helpful Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility. Server features for scheduler: It is…

Read full review

Shraddha Waghulde

Solution Architect at Predoole Analytics

Real-time data synchronization faces challenges with monitoring and affordability

The user-friendly interface in Qlik Replicate simplifies configuration and management of replication tasks because it is based on GUI, and users don't have to write any scripts. It is entirely drag and drop functionality. Even with zero knowledge of scripting, users can effectively use Qlik Replicate. The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature. As soon as data is entered into the source, it gets captured at target locations. This occurs in near real-time, with replication happening within seconds at the target location. Additionally, whatever operations are performed at the source, whether adding data, deleting data, or updating anything, it gets replicated at target locations. It functions as data injection from source to target, ensuring all operations performed on the source system are replicated on target systems.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."

"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."

"No dependence on native language and ease of use."

"We switched to CloverETL because of its flexibility to connect to various data sources and no dependence on native language and ease of use."

"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."

"Familiar, intuitive GUI coming from a Java development background, in-depth, descriptive, and well-laid-out documentation, responsive support through forums directly from Clover staff, a wealth of customizable pre-defined components, descriptive logging for error messages, and ease of install with a light footprint make it very effective to use."

"From a technical perspective, this is an excellent product."

"We use Qlik Replicate to change data capture of databases in production environments."

"It implements new real-time capabilities for data ingestion, works in hybrid mode that is a hybrid cloud, is very good, and it looks like it has very good performance, so we're quite happy."

"A pretty good series of connectors is one of the best features of Qlik Replicate."

"A valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is that you do not need ETL. It's easy to use—you choose two systems and it automatically replicates them. Even if there is no CDC available, if you insert it and update it, and there is nothing to find out, then you can use Qlik Replicate. It's a good product."

"The system is basically user-driven, mostly operating as a local platform."

"A valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is that you do not need ETL; it's easy to use—you choose two systems and it automatically replicates them."

"The most useful functions of Qlik Replicate are the data manipulation to transformations."

More Qlik Replicate pros

Cons

"Needs easier automated failure recovery, more and more intuitive auto-generated or filled-in code for components, and easier or more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"Its documentation could be improved."

"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."

"In the next release, I would like to see closer integration with data catalyst."

"This product could be improved by providing more insight regarding errors. One of our customers that uses Qlik Replicate has had an issue. We tried to debug it, but we could not trace the error message. The infrastructure site should give us more insight about errors. Qlik Replicate is not a business solution, it's an IT solution. The reporting tools and bug site should be improved."

"The product should improve its licensing limitation."

"We would like to see more details in messages about errors with the system."

"Some features on the graphical user interface are clunky."

"Support for this product could be better. When we do, my rating is a two out of five, because their internal support is not great."

"Support-wise, this solution is in need of improvement."

"In various scenarios, an important consideration is when we encounter issues and Qlik Replicate suggests reloading a specific table. If we face any problems or encounter errors with that table, it becomes necessary to make a change in Qlik Replicate. Performing a full reload every time is not feasible or practical. Instead, we should identify the specific issues and address them without repeating the entire reloading process. Based on this approach, we can investigate and resolve the problem by performing targeted loads from the source itself. This change aligns with my perspective and is something I would like to implement."

More Qlik Replicate cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."

"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."

"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

27%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

15%

Insurance Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Qlik Replicate?

The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data appli...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?

In terms of handling diverse data sources, Qlik Replicate does exhibit certain shortcomings.Other areas of Qlik Replicate that could be improved include its ability to serve as a single point tool,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?

My usual use cases for Qlik Replicate involve my previous organization and my current organization. I can provide my current experience. As an Australian energy provider, we have a lot of operation...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 16% of the time

ViaSQL by Adaptigent vs CloverETL

Compared 12% of the time

SSIS vs CloverETL

Compared 11% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs CloverETL

Compared 10% of the time

SAS Visual Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 9% of the time

More CloverETL Competitors

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 7% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 6% of the time

Qlik Compose vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Data Services vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 4% of the time

More Qlik Replicate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

March 2026

Download CloverETL product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate

March 2026

Download Qlik Replicate product report

Also Known As

No data available

Replicate, Qlik Replicate

Overview

CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.

Javlin

Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support.

Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.

Qlik

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA

American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. Qlik Replicate

March 2026

Free Report: CloverETL vs. Qlik Replicate

Find out what your peers are saying about CloverETL vs. Qlik Replicate and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloverETL vs. Qlik Replicate report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.