CloverETL vs Qlik Replicate comparison

Javlin and Qlik are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Javlin is ranked #65, while Qlik is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. Javlin holds a 0.2% mindshare in DI, compared to Qlik’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Javlin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

CloverETL

Read 2 CloverETL reviews

203 Views
145 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Replicate

Read 18 Qlik Replicate reviews

3,587 Views
2,682 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloverETL

Qlik Replicate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Replicate and CloverETL compete in the data integration category, each having unique strengths. Qlik Replicate has an advantage in real-time data movement due to its efficient data replication, while CloverETL is favored for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Qlik Replicate supports change data capture, low-latency replication, and compatibility with multiple data sources. CloverETL provides extensive data transformation capabilities, flexible data manipulation, and detailed control over processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloverETL offers modular deployment for customization, though requiring more initial setup. Qlik Replicate features intuitive setup for quick operational start and provides responsive customer support for fast issue resolution, while CloverETL offers comprehensive documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Replicate involves higher upfront costs but achieves fast ROI with operational efficiencies and reduced maintenance. CloverETL presents flexible pricing, appealing to varying organizational scales, achieving ROI through powerful processing.

To learn more, read our detailed CloverETL vs. Qlik Replicate Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. Qlik Replicate

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL

Ranking in Data Integration

65th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Visualization (39th)

Qlik Replicate

Ranking in Data Integration

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of CloverETL is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Replicate is 3.0%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

it_user856614

Lead Programmer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them, however we run out heap space even with a high allocation

Flexibility: We can bring in data from multiple sources, e.g., databases, text files, JSON, email, XML, etc. This has been very helpful Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility. Server features for scheduler: It is…

Read full review

KrishnaBaddam

Presales Manager at Artha Solutions

Lightweight tool, ensures that data is replicated across different systems and simplify complex tasks such as defining relationships

Qlik Compose is something that will automate user's overall data modernization. Here data modernization includes data modeling, ETL jobs, etc. But the advantage is users can automate the overall process of data engineering and data modeling through Qlik Compose. I think that's useful when users are able to manage 60% of the workload automated. That will be very useful. That's fantastic. Replicate does not have a great AI capability. AI capabilities are present in Qlik Sense. Qlik Replicate is a very light tool. It is only meant to capture data from the log files, get the data, and transfer it, read that table structure, create the table structure, and transfer the data whenever there is a change. So, it basically integrates with the kernel of the operating system. The way it works is that these replicate tools will integrate with the kernel of the operating system, and they will access the redo log files of the database. The redo log should have access to all the files of the structure of the schema, too. So, using that technique, they redo all the data structures, create a similar structure, and replicate the structure in the target schema, table, and database. After that is done, it will start tracing the instances that are happening. For example, if data is inserted into the table, then an insert is fired on the statement on the table. So, that particular insert is captured. And based on that insert statement, it will pull the SQL query and say, "Okay, there is an insert. I need to get that data." It will get the data from the redo log itself rather than going to a database. Then, it will just pass that transaction into the target system, where it will just insert the data. And this happens instantaneously, within a microsecond. So, if there is an insert, an update, or a delete, everything is transferred immediately. It is picked from the redo log because it comes to the redo log, and then the redo log sends it to Qlik Replicate and Replicate to the target system on which Replicate is installed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"No dependence on native language and ease of use."

"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."

"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."

"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."

"The most useful functions of Qlik Replicate are the data manipulation to transformations."

"The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data applications."

"The most valuable features of Qlik Replicate are its CDC performance and trigger functions. CDC feature is important to the financial industry."

"We use Qlik Replicate to change data capture of databases in production environments."

"It enables us to transform data at the latest stage rather than in ETL loads, so it's more ELT which is one of the advantages. It is also in near real-time, which brings significant advantage for our embedded analytics approach."

"The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature."

"The CDC and the flexibility to use QVD as a source are the most valuable features of Qlik Replicate."

"The system is basically user-driven, mostly operating as a local platform."

More Qlik Replicate pros

Cons

"Its documentation could be improved."

"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."

"Some features on the graphical user interface are clunky."

"Support-wise, this solution is in need of improvement."

"We would like to see more details in messages about errors with the system."

"It's not possible to replicate the QVC files in data analytics."

"In the next release, I would like to see closer integration with data catalyst."

"There is complexity involved in the licensing part of this system."

"We'd like better connectivity."

"This product could be improved by providing more insight regarding errors. One of our customers that uses Qlik Replicate has had an issue. We tried to debug it, but we could not trace the error message. The infrastructure site should give us more insight about errors. Qlik Replicate is not a business solution, it's an IT solution. The reporting tools and bug site should be improved."

More Qlik Replicate cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."

"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."

"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

19%

Insurance Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Qlik Replicate?

The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data appli...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?

Qlik Replicate could be improved in the next release by incorporating more monitoring options to monitor the logs. Currently, log monitoring is not easily accessible, so there should be improvement...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?

My customer's main use case for Qlik Replicate is with one of the payment banks in India. We have implemented this Replicate project for their source data migration to cloud solutions. They wanted ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 18% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 17% of the time

Qlik Compose vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 8% of the time

Fivetran vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 7% of the time

More Qlik Replicate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

June 2025

Download CloverETL product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate

June 2025

Download Qlik Replicate product report

Also Known As

No data available

Replicate, Qlik Replicate

Overview

CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.

Javlin

Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support.

Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.

Qlik

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA

American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. Qlik Replicate

May 2025

Free Report: CloverETL vs. Qlik Replicate

Find out what your peers are saying about CloverETL vs. Qlik Replicate and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloverETL vs. Qlik Replicate report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.