We performed a comparison between Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and Neo4j based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"Cloudera is a very manageable solution with good support."
"The most valuable feature is that I can use CDH for almost all use cases across all industries, including the financial sector, public sector, private retailers, and so on."
"CDH has a wide variety of proprietary tools that we use, like Impala. So from that perspective, it's quite useful as opposed to something open-source. We get a lot of value from Cloudera's proprietary tools."
"The product as a whole is good."
"The file system is a valuable feature."
"The solution is reliable and stable, it fits our requirements."
"I don't see any performance issues."
"We're now able to store large volumes of data through Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop. We're able to push large volumes of data to the platform, and that used to be a challenge, especially when storing a terabyte of information. This is the area where Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop improved the organization."
"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."
"It would be useful if Cloudera had more tools like SQL Engines that offer the traditional relational database. We have to do a lot of work preparing the data outside Cloudera before getting it into the platform."
"This is a very expensive solution."
"The security of this solution could be improved. There should also be a way to basically have a blockchain enabled storage with the HDFS."
"The initial setup of Cloudera is difficult."
"Cloudera's support is extremely bad and cannot be relied on."
"There are better solutions out there that have more features than this one."
"The procedure for operations could be simplified."
"It could be faster and more user-friendly."
"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."
Neo4j is a highly scalable, native graph database purpose-built to leverage not only data but also its relationships.
Neo4j's native graph storage and processing engine deliver constant, real-time performance, helping enterprises build intelligent applications to meet today’s evolving data challenges.
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 2nd in NoSQL Databases with 9 reviews while Neo4j is ranked 10th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 7.6, while Neo4j is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Stores large volumes of data and makes log analytics, monitoring, and management easier, but its feature list is limited". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neo4j writes "Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance". Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, SingleStore and InfluxDB, whereas Neo4j is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, DataStax and InfluxDB.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.