CloudCheckr vs Xops comparison

Spot - A Flexera company and AXIOMIO are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. Spot - A Flexera company is ranked #11 with an average rating of 6.0, while AXIOMIO is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0. Additionally, 66% of Spot - A Flexera company users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AXIOMIO users who would recommend it.

CloudCheckr

Read 8 CloudCheckr reviews

924 Views
536 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Xops

Read 4 Xops reviews

18 Views
18 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Xops

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloudCheckr and Xops based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Cost Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudCheckr vs. Xops Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr vs. Xops

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

11th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (28th), Managed Cloud Services (7th)

Xops

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

19th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Compliance Management (11th)

Featured Reviews

Peter Ramnath

Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides recommendations regarding how cost and consumption can be adjusted, but the reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited

We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security compliance feature doesn’t give much data because CloudCheckr has done a majority of its development on AWS. The majority of our clients are on Microsoft Azure. There are a lot of features and information available for Amazon, but not for Azure. The tool wasn't meeting our expectations. The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited. There's no ability to do scheduled email reports. The report could only be sent to a single email address. The tool was not very usable. We had multiple clients and tasks to work with.

Read full review

Sabb Sabb

CEO at Rexha Technologies

User interface needs refinement while providing robust security and cost management

Xops helps me with cloud finance management by allowing me to monitor my spending, and just a couple of months ago, I noticed that my AWS bill, which usually hovers around 50k monthly, spiked unexpectedly. I received an alert on the dashboard and via email about a sudden increase in usage, enabling me to rectify the actual problem and bring things back to normal. The best features of Xops, in my experience, include the FinOps component for checking unnecessary spending trends, the cloud security features, and the cybersecurity and workload security features that allow me to frequently check for vulnerabilities on images and websites. The cloud security feature of Xops stands out to me because it helps maintain compliance status by providing multiple compliance checks, including ISO and CIS benchmarks, and it is not limited to AWS, as it also includes Azure cloud scans and O365 cloud scans, allowing me to monitor security across various platforms. Other useful features of Xops include asset management tools and automation scripts, which help me check what assets I have across all regions, giving me a global view whenever I need it. Xops has positively impacted my organization by enabling me to save money and proactively detect issues, especially related to cloud spending, while also improving my routine security checks for any misconfigurations. While some metrics are difficult to quantify, I regularly run scans to catch security vulnerabilities that may arise due to changing user settings.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"The solution is mostly stable."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution include the Cloud FinOps Dashboards and the vulnerability scans."

"The automated compliance monitoring reduced our manual security audits by 60%, allowing our team to focus on strategic initiatives rather than repetitive checks."

Cons

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"I do not have notes for improvements."

"While Xops delivers on core functionality, the platform could benefit from more mature AI models for anomaly detection."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

The price depends on the actual Azure consumption and what we feed into it. The cost is on par with other providers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Xops?

I recommend ensuring you fully understand the pricing tiers and the features included at each level. You should evaluate it based on your actual cloud usage and security needs. X-Ops offers strong ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Xops?

I would like to see built-in anomaly detection for trading patterns using machine learning. It would also be helpful to have customizable dashboards for each business unit. Native support for cross...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Xops?

I use X-Ops to monitor and optimize AWS infrastructure costs for our trading workloads. It helps me ensure continuous security compliance and real-time threat detection. Additionally, I automate de...

See all answers

Comparisons

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 23% of the time

Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 17% of the time

Apptio One vs CloudCheckr

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 13% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr

Compared 12% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

October 2025

Download CloudCheckr product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

September 2025

Download Xops product report

Also Known As

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

No data available

Overview

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot - A Flexera company

Xops offers a robust platform for AWS infrastructure optimization, security compliance, and cost monitoring, delivering real-time alerts and efficient asset discovery for enhanced operational efficiency.

Xops provides users with automated tools for optimizing AWS infrastructure and securing cloud environments. With its AI-driven insights, users can optimize costs, detect threats, and improve their security posture through proactive monitoring and compliance checks. It facilitates asset discovery and automates the detection of idle resources, contributing to significant cost reductions and enhanced security. However, there is room to improve the AI models for anomaly detection and the user experience for more intuitive features. Expanding native support to platforms like GCP and incorporating cross-account resource dependency mapping would greatly enhance functionality. Enhanced dashboards and an interactive AI assistant can further boost user engagement.

What are Xops' essential features?

FinOps Dashboards: Provide detailed insights into cloud expenses and savings opportunities.
AWS Cost Optimization: Identifies idle resources to reduce unnecessary costs.
Vulnerability Scans: Continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities across platforms.
AI-Driven Insights: Delivers intelligence for threat detection and prevention.
Cross-Platform Security: Includes comprehensive checks for AWS, Azure, and O365.

Why should users consider Xops?

Cost Savings: Automatic idle resource detection leads to significant savings.
Improved Security: Real-time alerts bolster the security posture.
Operational Efficiency: Automated management reduces manual interventions.
Proactive Monitoring: Catches unexpected spending through real-time alerts.

Xops finds its application across industries seeking cloud management solutions, particularly in sectors prioritizing cybersecurity and cost management. Enterprises employ its capabilities for ensuring compliance with standards such as CIS and ISO 27001, conducting cybersecurity measures like DAST scans, and streamlining operational processes through automated deployments. Its deployment enhances financial operations and strengthens security protocols.

AXIOMIO

Sample Customers

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr vs. Xops

September 2025

Free Report: CloudCheckr vs. Xops

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudCheckr vs. Xops and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudCheckr vs. Xops report.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.