ClickHouse vs Percona Server comparison

ClickHouse and Percona are both solutions in the Open Source Databases category. ClickHouse is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8, while Percona is ranked #17. ClickHouse holds a 3.9% mindshare in OSD, compared to Percona’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ClickHouse users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Percona users who would recommend it.

ClickHouse

Read 10 ClickHouse reviews

836 Views
628 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Percona Server

Read 2 Percona Server reviews

1,133 Views
1,043 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ClickHouse

Percona Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Percona Server and ClickHouse compete in the database solutions market. Percona Server often has the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and support, whereas ClickHouse is stronger in performance and features.

Features:Percona Server is recognized for scalability, security, and MySQL compatibility, which boost performance in high-traffic environments. ClickHouse is known for real-time analytics, columnar storage, and fast data processing, beneficial for large-scale data analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Percona Server offers easy deployment with extensive documentation and prompt customer service. ClickHouse, requiring more expertise due to its complex architecture, benefits from community-driven support and detailed resources.

Pricing and ROI:Percona Server is valued for low setup costs and high ROI, thanks to its open-source nature and efficient support plans. ClickHouse may involve higher initial costs but delivers significant ROI with high-performance analytics and efficient data handling.

To learn more, read our detailed ClickHouse vs. Percona Server Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ClickHouse vs. Percona Server

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ClickHouse

Ranking in Open Source Databases

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (10th)

Percona Server

Ranking in Open Source Databases

17th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of ClickHouse is 3.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Percona Server is 1.7%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

ArpitShah

Software Analyst at CLSA

Open-source freedom with efficient data handling and room for documentation growth

A significant area for improvement is the documentation, which is not comprehensive and lacks centralized resources, making it difficult to find information. Additionally, ClickHouse lacks robust support for transactional data, which limits its use as a primary database. My developer experience could be enhanced through better-organized documentation, perhaps by offering a cheat sheet or centralized guide for common setup and usage scenarios.

Read full review

Umair Hassan

Database Administrator at Systems Limited

Open-source and free to use with a good community

I would love to see the flashback in Percona MySQL or even in Percona PostgreSQL. It's available in Oracle, the flashback. In Oracle, there's the utility of a flashback. It stores all the information in the tables for a few days. That way, if I accidentally delete my records from the table or I need to check the value of a column or row two days back, I can. If Percona had flashback capabilities, it would be ideal. I would love to see training be easier to find. I had some complications finding the training that Percona provides. It is not displayed on the website. For example, if I want to train myself via a Percona expert through virtual files or through recorded videos or something like that, it's really difficult to find any sort of course. You have to email them first, and they will ask you whether it is for yourself or it is for the corporate sector. The course content should just be readily available and not hidden.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is a database. It supports portal APIs and offers good flexibility."

"The main feature of ClickHouse is the optimizer because we had too many records to deduplicate, and the optimizer took this task by itself."

"ClickHouse is open source with no vendor lock-in, providing excellent freedom to choose any vendor without restrictions."

"It's easier to work with big data and calculations using the product."

"ClickHouse is much faster than traditional databases like MySQL and MongoDB. Its column-row searching strategy makes it very efficient. With ClickHouse, we can manage multiple databases, automatically insert data from other databases and delete data as needed. It supports real-time query performance, allowing simultaneous data insertion and retrieval. ClickHouse has improved significantly over the past two years, adding more functions and queries, as well as top functionality."

"ClickHouse is a user-friendly solution that tries to be compatible with SQL standards."

"We faced a challenge with deploying ClickHouse onto Kubernetes. Recently, we've been using ClickHouse Cloud, and the main issue is the high cost of the cloud service. The pricing isn't very competitive, especially for startups. I would instead buy a server and self-host if I have enough disk space. Besides that, ClickHouse has done very well, with clear goals and effective execution."

"The tool is column-based and infinitely scalable."

More ClickHouse pros

"We find the product mostly stable."

Cons

"Initially, I faced challenges integrating ClickHouse, particularly with inserting data from ActiveMQ, which caused duplicates. However, after adjusting the ClickHouse settings, the issue was resolved and there were no more duplicates."

"The aggregation capability is a valuable feature. It's highly efficient, allowing us to review entire transaction histories and user activities in the market. We've tried MongoDB, Postgres, MariaDB, and BigQuery, but ClickHouse is the most cost-efficient solution for collecting data at high speeds with minimal cost. We even used ClickHouse Cloud for a month, and it proved to be a great setup, especially for startups looking to handle big data. For example, if there is a need for 2-4 terabytes of data and around 40 billion rows with reasonable computing speed and latency, ClickHouse is ideal. Regarding the real-time query performance of ClickHouse, when using an API server to query it, I achieved query results in less than twenty milliseconds in some of my experiments with one billion rows. However, it depends on the scenario since ClickHouse has limitations in handling mutations. Additionally, one of ClickHouse's strengths is its compression capability. Our experimental server has only four terabytes, and ClickHouse effectively compresses data, allowing us to store large amounts of data at high speed. This compression efficiency is a significant advantage of using ClickHouse."

"One issue is that you need persistent volumes. Otherwise, if one system goes down, you lose data in that cluster."

"There aren't too many improvements I'd suggest for ClickHouse as it covers all my needs. There are just a few technical issues. For example, sometimes, when you want to get unique values and use certain tables, they don't work as expected. But it's not a major problem."

"If you join our team, it should be easy for you to use ClickHouse, especially if you are a developer. However, you need to read the documentation and understand the problems you are trying to solve."

"ClickHouse has its own concept of database triggers and doesn't support traditional database triggers."

"We had a lot of troubles while deploying a whole cluster."

"I would like ClickHouse to work more on integration with third-party tools."

More ClickHouse cons

"If Percona had flashback capabilities, it would be ideal."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you have an in-house deployment on Kubernetes or something, it's going to be very cheap since you'll be managing everything."

"The tool is free."

"ClickHouse has an open-source version, which is free to use and has almost all the features."

"We used the free, community version of ClickHouse."

"ClickHouse Cloud is not expensive compared to other databases, costing a few dollars per month while providing fast performance."

"The tool is open-source."

"For pricing, if you use the self-hosted version, it would be free. Cloud services pricing would be an eight out of ten. I try to minimize costs but still have to monitor usage."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Educational Organization

13%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ClickHouse?

ClickHouse is open source without direct fees, unlike other databases that have hidden fees or restrict hosting to their platforms. The open-source nature of ClickHouse allows for complete flexibil...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ClickHouse?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ClickHouse?

The main use case for ClickHouse is as a data warehouse for handling large volumes of data that exceed the capabilities of traditional databases like Postgres. I use it for creating dashboards and ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

InfluxDB vs ClickHouse

Compared 22% of the time

OpenSearch vs ClickHouse

Compared 13% of the time

SingleStore vs ClickHouse

Compared 10% of the time

Milvus vs ClickHouse

Compared 9% of the time

Cassandra vs ClickHouse

Compared 8% of the time

More ClickHouse Competitors

MariaDB vs Percona Server

Compared 35% of the time

MySQL vs Percona Server

Compared 29% of the time

PostgreSQL vs Percona Server

Compared 26% of the time

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs Percona Server

Compared 10% of the time

More Percona Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ClickHouse

April 2025

Download ClickHouse product report

Buyer's Guide

Open Source Databases

April 2025

Download Percona Server product report

Overview

ClickHouse is renowned for its speed, scalability, and real-time query performance. Its compatibility with SQL standards enhances flexibility while enabling integration with popular tools.

ClickHouse leverages a column-based architecture for efficient data compression and real-time analytics. It seamlessly integrates with tools like Kafka and Tableau and is effective in handling large datasets due to its cost-efficient aggregation capabilities. With robust data deduplication and strong community backing, users can access comprehensive documentation and up-to-date functionality. However, improvements in third-party integration, cloud deployment, and handling of SQL syntax differences are noted, impacting ease-of-use and migration from other databases.

What features make ClickHouse outstanding?

Speed and Scalability: Enables rapid deployment and scalability, particularly on Kubernetes.
SQL Compatibility: Aligns with SQL standards for flexible database management.
Column-based Structure: Offers efficient data compression and quick query performance.
Integration Support: Works with Kafka, Tableau, and other popular platforms.
Data Deduplication: Manages complex data duplication efficiently.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-Efficiency: Reduces expenses while managing large datasets effectively.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides fast data processing for real-time insights.
Flexibility: Offers multiple integration points and compatibility options.
Robust Documentation: Backed by an active development community, ensuring comprehensive support.

ClickHouse is deployed in sectors like telecommunications for passive monitoring and is beneficial for data analytics, logging Clickstream data, and as an ETL engine. Organizations harness it for machine learning applications when combined with GPT. With the ability to be installed independently, it's an attractive option for avoiding cloud service costs.

ClickHouse

Percona Server for MySQL is a free, fully compatible, enhanced, open source drop-in replacement for MySQL that provides good performance, scalability and instrumentation. With over 3,000,000 downloads, Percona Server for MySQL's self-tuning algorithms and support for extremely high-performance hardware delivers excellent performance and reliability.

Percona

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Pricefalls Marketplace, Micpoint, Rent the Runway, Transmart, Wattpad, Singular Group, Invoca, 3E

Buyer's Guide

ClickHouse vs. Percona Server

April 2025

Free Report: ClickHouse vs. Percona Server

Find out what your peers are saying about ClickHouse vs. Percona Server and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ClickHouse vs. Percona Server report.

See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors.

We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.