Elastic Search and ClickHouse compete in the data management and analysis category. Elastic Search holds an advantage in log monitoring through its robust integration with Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana, whereas ClickHouse offers superior real-time query performance and data handling capabilities.
Features: Elastic Search integrates Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana, offering a comprehensive platform for efficient log and machine data aggregation. Its open-source nature allows for community involvement and cost-efficiency, while the X-Pack license enhances its capabilities with advanced features. ClickHouse excels in real-time query performance, efficiently managing large datasets by utilizing a column-row searching strategy. It adheres to SQL standards, making it user-friendly for those familiar with SQL environments.
Room for Improvement: Elastic Search requires enhancements in security, scalability, and ease of use. Areas needing improvement include cross-cluster querying, machine learning functionalities, and alerting capabilities. ClickHouse faces challenges with integration with third-party tools and lacks comprehensive documentation. Deployment on modern platforms like Kubernetes and SQL syntax compatibility issues also need attention.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Search enjoys wide adoption across both on-premises and cloud environments, supported by extensive documentation. However, customer support can be slow. ClickHouse is versatile in deployment thanks to its open-source model and cloud compatibility, though users often need a deeper understanding of the deployment process. Both have active user communities for support, although Elastic Search's responsiveness has been noted as an issue.
Pricing and ROI: Elastic Search offers upfront cost savings as a FOSS tool, but costs can escalate with premium features. Its node-based licensing is flexible but can be confusing, providing a good ROI when used for open-source operations. ClickHouse remains cost-efficient for large-scale operations due to its open-source nature, providing fast performance without direct fees, seen as more cost-effective compared to competitors.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Elastic Search | 4.1% |
| ClickHouse | 4.3% |
| Other | 91.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 38 |
ClickHouse is renowned for its speed, scalability, and real-time query performance. Its compatibility with SQL standards enhances flexibility while enabling integration with popular tools.
ClickHouse leverages a column-based architecture for efficient data compression and real-time analytics. It seamlessly integrates with tools like Kafka and Tableau and is effective in handling large datasets due to its cost-efficient aggregation capabilities. With robust data deduplication and strong community backing, users can access comprehensive documentation and up-to-date functionality. However, improvements in third-party integration, cloud deployment, and handling of SQL syntax differences are noted, impacting ease-of-use and migration from other databases.
What features make ClickHouse outstanding?ClickHouse is deployed in sectors like telecommunications for passive monitoring and is beneficial for data analytics, logging Clickstream data, and as an ETL engine. Organizations harness it for machine learning applications when combined with GPT. With the ability to be installed independently, it's an attractive option for avoiding cloud service costs.
Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.
Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.
Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.
At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.
Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.
In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.
We monitor all Vector Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
