Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM vs Google Security Operations comparison

Odyssey Cybersecurity and Google are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Odyssey Cybersecurity is ranked #50 with an average rating of 7.0, while Google is ranked #27 with an average rating of 9.5. Odyssey Cybersecurity holds a 0.1% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Google’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Odyssey Cybersecurity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Google users who would recommend it.
ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM
Read 2 ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM reviews
  • 189 Views
  • 59 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Google Security Operations
Read 4 Google Security Operations reviews
  • 549 Views
  • 319 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Google Security Operations and ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM are competing security management solutions. Google has an edge in deployment and integration, whereas ClearSkies offers superior features justifying its price for comprehensive functionality seekers.

Features: Google Security Operations offers seamless integration with other Google services, advanced threat detection, and straightforward usage. ClearSkies provides extensive analytics, customizable reporting, and superior security event management, enabling users to gain detailed insights and adapt security measures accordingly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Security Operations is known for quick deployment and ease of integration, especially for existing Google users, simplifying the implementation process. ClearSkies, while more complex during setup, offers substantial customer support vital for handling initial deployment intricacies, facilitating deeper integration and customization.

Pricing and ROI: Google Security Operations offers a cost-effective initial setup, attracting businesses seeking affordable solutions within the Google ecosystem. ClearSkies, despite higher pricing, provides features that may lead to greater long-term ROI owing to its advanced capabilities. While Google's approach is economical, ClearSkies' potential for enhanced security efficiency makes its pricing viable for those prioritizing advanced operational features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM vs. Google Security Operations Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM vs. Google Security Operations
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
50th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Google Security Operations
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
27th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (15th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Security Operations is 0.8%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

ZH
Has good integration capability and provides information and events but improvement is needed in information retrieval speed
The best features are the comprehensive event collection and analysis. Once set up properly, we receive all events and information. The team analyzes our data and presents incidents to us. We can communicate with their team to escalate and resolve incidents. It has a feature we use to search for information about our environment and past incidents. This is very valuable. The integration capability is very good - the ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM team is collaborative. We've integrated most of our systems, including EDR and NDR. They have agents to collect events from servers and assets.
Read full review
reviewer2203269 - PeerSpot reviewer
Real-time threat detection and alarm management have improved security operations
Google SecOps is extremely useful for threat detection and hunting. It provides a detailed pipeline for detection and is beneficial for real-time threat monitoring when integrated with Mandiant. The tool's integration capabilities are effective, and it helps in managing alarms for normal threats efficiently. Overall, Google SecOps is a very useful service for security operations.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The correlation rules and the user platform are most valuable."
"The integration capability is very good - the ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM team is collaborative. We've integrated most of our systems, including EDR and NDR. They have agents to collect events from servers and assets."
"Overall, Google SecOps is a very useful service for security operations."
"Google SecOps is extremely useful for threat detection and hunting."
"The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user interface is generally straightforward, although recent changes may require some adjustment and Siemplify's integrations and capabilities offer potential support for various compliance requirements."
"Without hyperbole, I have never, in my entire career, encountered a vendor or a vendor community as awesome as Siemplify. Siemplify and the Siemplify Community quite literally made it possible for our SOC to increase almost five-fold in our number of clients and number of analysts and to go from a Monday to Friday 9-5 shop to a 24/7 shop all in the span of under a year and a half and all while continually adding capabilities and improving the services we offer to our clients."
"The most valuable feature of Siemplify is the playbooks that can be created."
 

Cons

"The main issue for improvement is the platform's slowness in presenting information. Retrieving information can take a little time when clicking on something."
"They can add behavior analytics and AI or machine learning technology. They also improve their correlation engine. In addition to collecting logs from devices, they can collect the traffic and then correlate these logs and the traffic information."
"We often encounter minor issues that could be improved, but we maintain communication with the developers and submit feature requests. Recently, I requested enhancements such as improved search functionality within playbooks and expanded options for exporting case data."
"Building the playbooks could be easier and the integration could improve. It is a difficult process, such as what API connections need to be made."
"The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions."
"I'm inclined to say that I'd love to see some Machine Learning capabilities integrated into the platform, however, I just attended a demo this morning where Siemplify gave a sneak peek into some Machine Learning capabilities that they are currently developing and have roadmapped for release soon."
"The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They have changed the pricing policy. Its price is competitive. Its price is less than half of the price of QRadar, LogRhythm, and Splunk."
"Regarding pricing, I'd say it's in the middle range. Pricing is very good compared to others."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
16%
Retailer
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM?
Regarding pricing, I'd say it's in the middle range. Pricing is very good compared to others.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM?
The main issue for improvement is the platform's slowness in presenting information. Retrieving information can take a little time when clicking on something.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM?
I use the solution as a SIEM and managed SOC. It collects events and incidents from all our systems like, EDR, NDR, servers, and switches. The managed SOC team raises incidents for us to review and...
See all answers
What do you like most about Siemplify?
The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user inter...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Siemplify?
The pricing for Google SecOps and Microsoft Sentinel is almost the same, with no significant differences.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Siemplify?
The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions. Google SecOps reports could be more detailed, similar to the comprehensive descriptions provided by Microso...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM Security QRadar vs ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM
Compared 100% of the time
More ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM Competitors
Microsoft Sentinel vs Google Security Operations Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Google Security Operations
Compared 19% of the time
Google Chronicle Suite vs Google Security Operations Logo
Google Chronicle Suite vs Google Security Operations
Compared 16% of the time
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Google Security Operations Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Google Security Operations
Compared 13% of the time
Splunk SOAR vs Google Security Operations Logo
Splunk SOAR vs Google Security Operations
Compared 12% of the time
Cortex XSIAM vs Google Security Operations Logo
Cortex XSIAM vs Google Security Operations
Compared 12% of the time
More Google Security Operations Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
June 2025
ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM reportDownload ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM product report
Buyer's Guide
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
June 2025
Google Security Operations reportDownload Google Security Operations product report
 

Also Known As

ClearSkies NG SIEM
Siemplify ThreatNexus
 

Overview

ClearSkies™ Software-as-a-Service is a fast, robust, scalable and flexible Next Generation SIEM solution. It provides real-time correlation of log data combined with evidence-based knowledge of emerging threats and vulnerabilities, thus allowing the early detection of and response to targeted attacks and data breaches.

Odyssey Cybersecurity

Google Security Operations provides advanced threat detection and response capabilities. Tailored for cybersecurity professionals, it integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure, offering a proactive approach to managing security challenges.

Designed for enterprises requiring robust threat management, Google Security Operations harnesses the power of Google's infrastructure to deliver comprehensive insights into potential vulnerabilities and attack vectors. Leveraging AI and machine learning, users benefit from enhanced accuracy and speed in identifying threats, making it a crucial tool in maintaining cybersecurity resilience. Its adaptability allows businesses to customize security protocols, ensuring alignment with specific security strategies.

What are the most crucial features of Google Security Operations?

  • Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify potential threats quickly.
  • Automated Response: Streamlines response measures to mitigate risks efficiently.
  • Scalability: Designed to grow with the security demands of an organization.
  • Integration Capabilities: Easily connects with existing security tools and platforms.

What benefits do users gain from Google Security Operations?

  • Improved Security Posture: Strengthens defenses against emerging threats.
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for extensive manual monitoring efforts.
  • Enhanced Decision Making: Provides detailed insights for informed security strategies.
  • Operational Efficiency: Increases the effectiveness of cybersecurity teams.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Google Security Operations is implemented to address specific regulatory and compliance requirements. Its adaptive features support cybersecurity frameworks, ensuring data protection and risk management standards are met effectively.

Google
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
FedEx Mondelez Intenrational Check Point Trustwave Atos Cyberint Bae Systems Crowe Longwall Security Telefonica Nordea HCL
Buyer's Guide
ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM vs. Google Security Operations
June 2025
Free Report: ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM vs. Google Security Operations
Find out what your peers are saying about ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM vs. Google Security Operations and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM vs. Google Security Operations report.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.