Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Claude for Enterprise vs Honeycomb Enterprise comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Claude for Enterprise
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
AI-Powered Chatbots (7th), AI Writing Tools (7th), Large Language Models (LLMs) (5th), AI Proofreading Tools (5th)
Honeycomb Enterprise
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (25th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the AI Code Assistants category, the mindshare of Claude for Enterprise is 10.5%, up from 9.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Honeycomb Enterprise is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Code Assistants Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Claude for Enterprise10.5%
Honeycomb Enterprise0.2%
Other89.3%
AI Code Assistants
 

Featured Reviews

Nishant Thakkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Data visualization and workflow efficiency improve with automated features
I do not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer, and I was not offered a gift card or incentive for this review. We use other tech products such as Microsoft Excel and Slack. We can use my real name when publishing my review, along with my real company name. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Claude an 8.
meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
Its pattern-matching and code transformation capabilities can be adapted for mass identification and remediation of vulnerable libraries
I asked very specific questions to Mr. Pell about consideration of code security scenarios in pattern design and rules, specifically that tuned with OWASP Top 10. I believe addition of code security focus can be a value-add, though the way Grit architecture is designed and how it works, it is and may not become an alternative choice of code security solutions. Rather, it must be treated as a powerful supplementary tool that augments the existing code security solutions (such as Snyk or Checkmarx) in a DevSecOps or Secure DevOps environment. Anyone interested in learning more on this front or have queries, can get in touch with me for a consulting.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Claude has positively impacted my organization, as evident from the metrics which show productivity doubling and turnaround time being cut in half."
"Overall, I rate Claude nine out of ten."
"The solution's most valuable features are the queries for the OpenTelemetry events and all the tracing."
"The approach offers significant benefits in terms of efficiency, consistency, and proactive security management, particularly valuable for organizations with large, distributed development teams."
"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward since we were getting enough support from Honeycomb.io's team."
 

Cons

"The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way."
"The process of log scraping gets delayed on Honeycomb.io. At times, it gives false alerts to the application team."
"We can make alerts based on static numbers, which may block us from building alerts that could be generic enough or could be serviced."
"The way Grit architecture is designed and how it works, it is and may not become an alternative choice of code security solutions."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Code Assistants solutions are best for your needs.
869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
University
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Claude?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was straightforward without running into major challenges.
What needs improvement with Claude?
I face issues with Claude halting or hallucinating occasionally, as it happens with some projects but not all.
What is your primary use case for Claude?
I use Claude, particularly its artifact features, for data visualization. On a weekly basis, we create newsletters for our clients that require beautiful and good-looking presentations, particularl...
What needs improvement with Honeycomb.io?
We faced some OpenTelemetry metrics lost between the communication from the service and the Honeycomb.io. I can't say if this is a Honeycomb.io issue or if there are some limitations in OpenTelemet...
What is your primary use case for Honeycomb.io?
The solution is mainly used for stack observability. It observes service behavior or any kind of failure that may be happening. The tool is also related to research. My company is working more on t...
What advice do you have for others considering Honeycomb.io?
We set up Honeycomb.io on all the services so that we can have all the set traces of the communication between all the services inside the company. This helps us understand where it could be failin...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Grit
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Clover Health, Eaze, Intercom, Fender
Find out what your peers are saying about Claude for Enterprise vs. Honeycomb Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.