Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] comparison

Cisco and F5 are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Additionally, 95% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of F5 users who would recommend it.

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Read 19 Cisco Sourcefire SNORT reviews

1,249 Views
1,037 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Threat Stack Cloud Security...

Read 8 Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] reviews

88% willing to recommend

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Threat Stack Cloud Security...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 4, 2025

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] are two security solutions in the cybersecurity category. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT holds the upper hand due to its robust threat detection capabilities and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT offers network intrusion detection, highly customizable rule sets, and intelligent security automation. It provides advanced threat protection and real-time contextual awareness. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] features cloud workload security, real-time visibility of cloud activities, and the ability to consume data through APIs, excelling in cloud-centric environments.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT can improve on its need for dedicated resources during setup and enhance support tools for cloud environments. It might also look into improving functionality for quicker deployment. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] could enhance integration capabilities with additional platforms, develop its feature set for non-cloud environments, and simplify initial configuration processes to reduce noise in alerts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT requires on-premises setup, making it resource-intensive, but offers strong customer support channels. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] stands out with its seamless cloud-native deployment, which is faster to implement and optimize, and leverages its SaaS model for rapid customer service solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is attractive because of its lower initial setup cost. It appeals to budget-conscious organizations. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] justifies its higher costs with significant ROI, offering comprehensive solutions that cater to scalability and evolving cloud security needs, ensuring long-term value though the pricing specifics are not available.

To learn more, read our detailed Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (14th)

Threat Stack Cloud Security...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Jack Poon

Treasury Specialist at Dah Sing Bank

Offers ease of setup and good documentation

When it comes to the product's deployment phase, we have a lot of vendor support. We have a lot of skills here in Hong Kong. Our company doesn't find any problem deploying Cisco solutions. The solution is deployed on an on-premises version. Speaking about the time required to deploy the solution, I would say that we have quite a lot of previous experience with deploying Cisco products. We have our company's standard design document, which we need to follow. We have a standard testing procedure for all those features. We just take out some appropriate parts and then compile them into one document for an individual project. It is actually quite easy for us to do the documentation, so it just takes one or two hours, and we can do the implementation because all the materials and testing procedures are already in our company standard documents, so it is not that difficult for us.

Read full review

Vincent Romney

Director of Information Security at Younique, LLC

Pivotal for SOX and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance as well as security in AWS, but needs work on the application layer side

It certainly has a lot of capabilities and we're not using much of what it can do. That's something that, as we mature as an organization, we'll expand into. The one thing that we know they're working on, but we don't have through the tool, is the application layer. As we move to a serverless environment, with AWS Fargate or direct Lambda, that's where Threat Stack does not have the capacity to provide feed. Those are areas that it's blind to now, so that's the biggest area for improvement. They're currently looking at changing that with an acquisition, but as it stands right now, that's the only spot that I consider weak.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the filtering."

"The URL filtering is very good and you can create a group for customized URLs."

"The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet."

"I like most of Cisco's features, like malware detection and URL filtering."

"It has a huge rate of protection. It's has a low level of positives and a huge rate of threat protection. It's easy to deploy and easy to implement. It has an incredible price rate compared to similar solutions."

"The whole solution is very good, and stable."

"The solution can be integrated with some network electors like Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco ISE, and Active Directory to provide the client with authentication certificates."

"The solution is rather easy to use."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT pros

"Technical support is very helpful."

"The most valuable feature is the SecOps because they have our back and they help us with the reports... It's like having an extension of your team. And then, it grows with you."

"Every other security tool we've looked is good at containers, or at Kubernetes, is good at AWS, or at instance monitoring. But nobody is good at tying all of those things together, and that's really where Threat Stack shines."

"We like the ability of the host security module to monitor the processes running on our servers to help us monitor activity."

"An important feature of this solution is monitoring. Specifically, container monitoring."

"We're using it on container to see when activity involving executables happens, and that's great."

"There has been a measurable decrease in the meantime to remediation... because we have so many different tech verticals already collated in one place, our ability to respond is drastically different than it used to be."

"Threat Stack has connectivity."

More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] pros

Cons

"Performance needs improvement."

"If the price is brought down then everybody will be happy."

"The initial setup is a little difficult compared to other products in the market. It depends on the environment. If we are doing any migration, it might take months in a brown-field environment."

"The customization of the rules can be simplified."

"I did not experience any pain points that required improvement. Maybe a couple of false-positives, but that's about it."

"The cloud can be improved."

"To be frank, the product is not really stable, although they're working on that. Whenever I go to the technical community with an issue, they will usually say that it is not there yet, but the technical team are working on it. The issues are not insolvable. I think they should just keep working on the product to make sure that the product can become very stable. The technical support is great. I appreciate that. We have a lot of communities supporting Firepower now, so you can find help for whatever issue you have."

"I would like to have analytics included in the suite."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT cons

"The one thing that we know they're working on, but we don't have through the tool, is the application layer. As we move to a serverless environment, with AWS Fargate or direct Lambda, that's where Threat Stack does not have the capacity to provide feed. Those are areas that it's blind to now..."

"The reports aren't very good. We've automated the report generation via the API and replaced almost all the reports that they generate for us using API calls instead."

"It shoots back a lot of alerts."

"The compliance and governance need improvement."

"I would like further support of Windows endpoint agents or the introduction of support for Windows endpoint agents."

"They could give a few more insights into security groups and recommendations on how to be more effective. That's getting more into the AWS environment, specifically. I'm not sure if that's Threat Stack's plan or not, but I would like them to help us be efficient about how we're setting up security groups. They could recommend separation of VPCs and the like - really dig into our architecture. I haven't seen a whole lot of that and I think that's something that, right off the bat, could have made us smarter."

"The solution’s ability to consume alerts and data in third-party tools (via APIs and export into S3 buckets) is moderate. They have some work to do in that area... The API does not mimic the features of the UI as far as reporting and pulling data out go. There's a big discrepancy there."

"The user interface can be a little bit clunky at times... There's a lot of information that needs to be waded through, and the UI just isn't great."

More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a three-year license for this solution."

"The cost is per port and can be expensive but it does include training and support for three years."

"I don't know the exact amount, but most of the time when I go to a company with a proposition, they will say, "This thing that you are selling is good, but it's expensive. Why don't you propose something like FortiGate, Check Point, or Palo Alto?" Cisco device are expensive compared to other devices."

"Licensing for this solution is paid on a yearly basis."

"If one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is cheap, I rate the tool's price as a five."

"It is very expensive compared to some other products. The pricing is definitely high."

"It came in cheaper than Trend Micro when we purchased it a few years ago."

"Pricing seems to be in line with the market structure. It's fine."

"It is a cost-effective choice versus other solutions on the market."

"We find the licensing and pricing very easy to understand and a good value for the services provided."

"I'm happy with the amount that we spend for the product that we get and the overall service that we get. It's not cheap, but I'm still happy with the spend."

"What we're paying now is somewhere around $15 to $20 per agent per month, if I recall correctly. The other cost we have is SecOps."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

University

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Real Estate/Law Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

If one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is cheap, I rate the tool's price as a five. There are some other tools in the market that are more expensive than Cisco. There are no additional c...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

Cisco offers the Cisco DNA Center, which is a source that provides crucial information for us to monitor performance, and see whether there is any trouble. We are using Cisco DNA center, but again,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 20% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 19% of the time

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 16% of the time

Vectra AI vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 9% of the time

Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 8% of the time

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 30% of the time

Netskope vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 25% of the time

Cisco IOS Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

July 2025

Download Cisco Sourcefire SNORT product report

Buyer's Guide

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

June 2025

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] report

Download Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Sourcefire SNORT

Threat Stack, CSP,

Overview

Snort is an open-source, rule-based, intrusion detection and prevention system. It combines the benefits of signature-, protocol-, and anomaly-based inspection methods to deliver flexible protection from malware attacks. Snort gained notoriety for being able to accurately detect threats at high speeds.

Cisco

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] offers robust security features including endpoint monitoring, rule customization, and integration capabilities, with easy connectivity to cloud services like Docker and AWS.

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] provides tools for enhancing security visibility across cloud infrastructure. It supports AWS and Docker integration, facilitating efficient threat detection and management. Users appreciate its capability to configure customizable alerts and monitor endpoints, sessions, API interactions, and cloud services. However, there are areas needing improvement, such as better serverless environment support and reduced alert frequency. The platform services smaller organizations by compensating for limited security resources with its comprehensive monitoring and auditing tools.

What are the key features?

Easy Cloud Service Integration: Streamlined connectivity with Docker and AWS for efficient monitoring.
Customizable Rule Sets: Tailor security rules to meet specific organizational needs.
Email Alerts: Receive timely notifications about security events and threats.
Interactive Session Monitoring: Track live sessions for suspicious activities.
API Integration: Connect effortlessly with third-party tools for an enhanced security posture.
SecOps Support: Assistance for organizations lacking dedicated security teams.

What are the benefits and ROI features?

Streamlined Threat Detection: Effective process monitoring to identify potential threats.
Cost Efficiency: Serves companies with limited resources by providing essential security functions.
Comprehensive Audits: Helps in regular examinations of cloud infrastructure, enhancing compliance.
Visibility into Cloud Operations: Offers a detailed dashboard for threat visibility and monthly vulnerability assessments.

In specific industries, Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] is utilized for its strength in monitoring cloud infrastructure and preventing unauthorized access. Organizations in fields where cloud operations are critical use it for regular audits and monitoring. Its capabilities in threat management are leveraged to maintain secure operations and compliance, especially where there is no dedicated security team.

Sample Customers

CareCore, City of Biel, Dimension Data, LightEdge, Lone Star College System, National Rugby League, Port Aventura, Smart City Networks, Telecom Italia, The Department of Education in Western Australia

StatusPage.io, Walkbase, Spanning, DNAnexus, Jobcase, Nextcapital, Smartling, Veracode, 6sense

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Check Point Software Technologies, Fortinet and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS). Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.