Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System comparison

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Download the complete report

Helped 879,425 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Intrusion Preventio...

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is 3.5%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is 2.7%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)	3.5%
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System	2.7%
Other	93.8%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

reviewer373227

System Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Marketing strengths shine but regaining user trust needs significant effort

There are numerous things that could be improved about Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) to get it back on track. Sollution for small branches: when we have to connect a lot very small branches (or sometimes only an ATM) we need something small, with LTE and with reasonable price. Cisco response is SDWAN but it is not always the case. Recently Cisco released some small firewalls but I have not tried them yet. Central management with FMC is a very good idea, but sometimes local management or monitoring is helpfull. With Cisco You have to decide: central or local. You cannot have both. Regarding usability, when you commit configuration on Cisco, it sometimes takes very long. Commits also take some time for the competition, but Cisco is definitely lagging behind the rest in this respect. Last but not least, for me as a professional is lack of CLI. With CLI, I can configure every firewall on the market except Cisco. CLI is very important in professional working, and IMHO it was an unwise decision by Cisco to remove it. Graphical interfaces are very nice, but when you've got thousands of objects in a big installation and have to configure many things, CLI is a much faster way to do it.

Read full review

Bhupesh-Sharma

Large account Manager at Softcell Technologies Limited

Has offered reliable threat protection and detailed network insights but could expand features beyond existing capabilities

The best features of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System include advanced ATP (Advanced Threat Protection), which uses signatures, behavior analysis, and machine learning to stop zero-day exploits and malware advanced persistent threats (APTs). They track and collect data from APTs, which allows them to track malicious files entering the environment. The system offers inline prevention and real-time automatic blocking of malicious packets before they reach the network. It integrates with the Trellix ecosystem and provides application visibility and control. The solution provides deep insight into network traffic, applications, and protocols for better information. All packets coming through the application are analyzed and reported. They share intelligence updates regularly to protect from different malicious files and sector-specific threats. It supports both on-premise and cloud environments.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are satisfied with the technical support."

"In the virtual deployment, you have a couple of choices depending on your needs and how much bandwidth you have that needs to be inspected."

"I think their fingerprints are good in terms of how they whitelist and blacklist."

"The integration with the Cisco portfolio is very helpful."

"The solution is good at scaling."

"Cisco NGIPS is working well overall with our current needs."

"The security intelligence in the product is the best feature and give us all the information that we need in our network."

"This is a stable solution."

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) pros

"The feature I found most valuable is the network threat analyzer in the security platform. It also integrates with GTI, or Global Threat Intelligence. Otherwise, I just use the basic features."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is a good product for dealing with DDoS attacks and for the inspection of network traffic."

"The threat intelligence updates are very accurate."

"The best features of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System include advanced ATP (Advanced Threat Protection), which uses signatures, behavior analysis, and machine learning to stop zero-day exploits and malware advanced persistent threats (APTs)."

"It has a lot of functions, such as firewall. We are administrators, and we create some rules to protect our network. We also monitor the traffic in and out and have disk encryption on-premises. When we detect malware, we scan for the virus on the PC. We can then delete or block the malware."

"Great monitoring feature."

"The most valuable features in Trellix for me are the automated signature updates. It is a great and convenient feature."

"The product is worth the investment."

More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System pros

Cons

"The price of Cisco NGIPS could improve."

"More flexibility with the dashboards is needed because some of them are not fully developed."

"The file trajectory, the trace in contamination files, could be improved."

"Our customers are still facing many bugs on the system. It has matured noticeably, but we are still facing multiple stability issues on Firepower. There are more than 80 or 90 bugs for each release node. It's a considerable number of bugs."

"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"It is no longer scalable because it has gone end of life."

"I would like to see Cisco NGIPS to include home office support in one single product."

"The stability of the user console and some features could be easier to access."

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) cons

"Some of the documentation is not as straightforward as it could be."

"Integration with Global Thereat Intelligence could be better. Also, I think management solutions are end of life now at McAfee. Network threat analyzer may be used for endpoint quarantines. Integration between these sides, as well as endpoint APO, will help you quarantine the risky endpoints."

"The technical support has room for improvement."

"We would like to have a simpler version. Some settings and functions on the McAfee console are complex and complicated. I want the management console to be simpler."

"There are limited resources for configuration guidance."

"The technical support must be improved."

"The solution needs to improve the graphical interface. And they had a limitation in some of the sensor modems as well."

"The pricing could be improved."

More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licenses for this product are available for either one, or three year terms."

"We get cut in price since we use other Cisco products. We have the whole bundle of Cisco solutions."

"This is an expensive product, with the biggest cost being the license that keeps the service going."

"The price for additional throughput is the highest in the industry."

"They are very expensive in some places and not reasonable at times for many customers. I have had customers choose another solution because of the high price."

"I would rate the pricing four out of 10."

"In our company, we know that the price of Cisco products is high, especially for its switches, routers and IOS. The price of Cisco products may be twice its original price if you plan to extend some of its features."

"The annual licensing tends to be expensive, but in terms of implementing the licenses, it's a very uncomplicated process and as easy as copy-paste in its straightforwardness."

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."

"The tool is competitively priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

University

Educational Organization

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	17
Large Enterprise	26

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco NGIPS?

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco NGIPS?

Cisco is one of the top brands known for cost-effectiveness, making it worth the money. It's cheaper to integrate with existing IT security solutions compared to other expensive brands with subscri...

What needs improvement with Cisco NGIPS?

What do you like most about McAfee Network Security Platform?

The threat intelligence updates are very accurate.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Network Security Platform?

The tool is competitively priced. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.

What needs improvement with McAfee Network Security Platform?

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System does not provide virtual patching. Patching involves updates on the OS side to address vulnerabilities, which is a different functionality. Trellix Intrusion Pre...

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Comparisons

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 13% of the time

Check Point IPS vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 13% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 12% of the time

Darktrace vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 5% of the time

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) Competitors

Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 21% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 16% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 14% of the time

Vectra AI vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Security Network IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 5% of the time

More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Competitors

Product Reports

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Download Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) product report

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Download Trellix Intrusion Prevention System product report

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System report

Also Known As

Sourcefire NGIPS, Firepower NGIPS

McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, IntruShield Network Intrusion Prevention System, IntruShield Network IPS

Overview

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) provides intrusion prevention, malware detection, and DDoS protection with modularity, third-party integration, and cloud capabilities, focusing on flexibility, automation, and real-time threat detection, while offering centralized management and ease of upgrading.

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is designed to support network security through an open platform, delivering features such as anomaly detection and security intelligence. Users benefit from robust technical support, making it a reliable choice for enterprises seeking to protect their network infrastructures. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness, interface complexity, and integration with third-party tools. There is a demand for better reporting, sandboxing capabilities, and enhanced AI-driven threat detection and response times, especially for zero-day attacks. Pricing remains a concern due to high costs and licensing complexity.

What are the key features of Cisco Secure IPS?

Intrusion Prevention: Detect and block malicious activities across networks to maintain security.
Malware Detection: Identify and mitigate malicious software in real time.
DDoS Protection: Safeguard against distributed denial-of-service attacks that can disrupt operations.
Integration: Seamlessly connect with third-party tools for enhanced functionality.
Cloud Capabilities: Use cloud-based resources for scalable and flexible security solutions.
Real-Time Threat Detection: Identify potential threats instantly to prevent exploitation.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Centralized management and hardware-free upgrading help reduce expenses.
Flexibility: Modular design and open platform ensure adaptability to changing needs.
Support: Access to expert technical assistance ensures smooth operations.
Scalability: Cloud deployment options offer enhanced scalability for growing demands.

Businesses deploy Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) in both on-premises and cloud environments, addressing needs like compliance audits and integration with platforms such as Cisco Talos and Umbrella. Its implementation strengthens perimeter security, enhances cybersecurity in enterprise and banking sectors, and ensures effective threat management for network defense.

Cisco

Block More Intrusions
Stop new and unknown attacks with signature-based and signature-less intrusion prevention systems. Signature-less intrusion detection finds malicious network traffic and stops attacks where no signatures exist.

Unify Virtual and Physical Security
Support network virtualization across private and public cloud platforms to scale security and evolve with changing IT dynamics.

Maximize Security and Performance
Scale hardware performance to speeds up to 100 Gbps and leverage data from multiple products.

Trellix

Sample Customers

American Electric Power, Huntington Bank, Keycorp, Nationwide, Transunion, Marriott, Inova Health, Ford, Thomson Reuters, Dow Chemical, Equifax, Chevron, Walmart, Coca Cola

Desjardins Group, HollyFrontier, Nubia, Agbar, WNS Global Services, INAIL, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla (UDLAP), Cook County, China Pacific Insurance, Bank Central Asia, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, City of Chicago, Macquarie Telecom, Sutherland Global Services, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United Automotive Electronic Systems

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System