Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs InfoVista VistaInsight comparison

Cisco and Infovista are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Cisco is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.4, while Infovista is ranked #90. Cisco holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Infovista’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Infovista users who would recommend it.

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabri...

Read 26 Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) reviews

2,437 Views
2,340 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

InfoVista VistaInsight

Read 2 InfoVista VistaInsight reviews

1,125 Views
1,103 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabri...

InfoVista VistaInsight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

InfoVista VistaInsight and Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller are competing products in network management and optimization. InfoVista appears favorable due to its pricing and support, while Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller is highlighted for its feature-rich capabilities, making it worth the investment for larger enterprises.

Features: InfoVista VistaInsight's valuable features include network performance monitoring, predictive analytics, and efficient network management. Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller is noted for comprehensive automation, integration with existing Cisco environments, and robust features for large-scale deployments.

Room for Improvement: InfoVista VistaInsight could enhance its automation capabilities, expand integration options, and improve scalability for larger enterprises. Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller might simplify its user interface, offer more intuitive configuration options, and enhance interoperability with non-Cisco systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: InfoVista VistaInsight offers straightforward deployment and accessible, efficient customer support. Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller provides efficient deployment within Cisco infrastructures, though its complexity requires considerable expertise. InfoVista is perceived as more user-friendly, while Cisco appeals to technically skilled teams through broader integration capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: InfoVista VistaInsight is recognized for competitive pricing and quicker initial ROI due to lower upfront costs. Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller involves a higher initial investment but offers higher long-term ROI with scalable features and performance benefits, appealing to larger enterprises seeking comprehensive network solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Monitoring Software Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabri...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

InfoVista VistaInsight

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

90th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InfoVista VistaInsight is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)	0.6%
InfoVista VistaInsight	0.4%
Other	99.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Jagdev Dhaliwal

Network Engineer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Flow monitoring has improved planning for east-west traffic and real-time capacity decisions

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) helps to understand the flows and data plane capacities, which are the primary use cases. Usually, people struggle with east-west traffic flow when they need to decide on firewalls or products. People typically understand north-south traffic flows but usually miss the east-west traffic flows in data centers. I was focusing more on this so that people can accordingly plan, such as after F5, the number of servers, the number of sessions needed, and whether we need to plan the interface for groups from the line capacity perspective. This kind of information was valuable to us. The real-time telemetry feature was beneficial. When experiencing performance issues, I could determine if there were any issues related to flows or areas where bottlenecks were occurring.

Read full review

Youssef El Hayek

OSS Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

A powerful service that is very stable and scalable

It's a very powerful service, you have to use your training and understand how to work it. After that, it's very easy to collect and to use. It may be hard to use for the administrators. It's like a Ferrari, if you're a very good driver you'll go to 300 but you have to know how to drive it. If you have a Ferrari but you don't know how to use it, it's not going to be good. Also, it's very important to understand what the customer needs to decide on what kind of products you are going to use, and what product and what solution to implement. I would rate the solution nine out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can integrate all the networks into the software."

"After installation, you almost forget that it is working."

"More than good enough as we have new clients everyday connected using this product"

"The interface of this solution is easy to use overall."

"Automation of the ILS."

"This solution is the easiest and most straightforward."

"Cisco's support I would rate as a 10 compared to all other vendors."

"It has a very nice dashboard so you can see what's currently happening in the network and the performance of the back story."

More Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) pros

"The product is excellent."

"My experience with technical support has been perfect."

Cons

"It's a relatively expensive product for some clients."

"The visibility of applications is not great."

"It would be nice to have the ability to more easily collect information from other software when doing some types of analysis."

"It is not very easy to monitor or to browse."

"The configuration is too complicated and you have to create templates and use a lot of menus."

"API lacks robustness."

"The configuration is too complicated and you have to create templates and use a lot of menus."

"One of the biggest challenges is that we aren't always able to push the configuration onto the target device. Whenever this happens, we have to do a factory reset, put on the script, and then reconfigure it again. In the next release, I would like to have a troubleshooting feature."

More Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) cons

"The presentation of the features can be improved."

"The presentation of the features can be improved. It can be more user-friendly for the visual part of the portal and to allow the customer to be able to use."

"However, the license is expensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On average, Data Center Network Manager's pricing isn't too costly unless you choose a premier license."

"The product is licensed with contracts that work on a yearly basis rather than a monthly model."

"I would say that the pricing offers great value for the money."

"The price of Cisco Data Center Network Manager is expensive compared to other vendors on the market."

"When we purchase a Nexus box, the MDS CM license comes with it."

"The solution is very expensive."

"The tool is always expensive, but their service, product quality, and support are good. We're happy with it, but it's still an expensive solution. There are cheaper alternatives but no similar platform across all domains."

"We usually opt for a yearly plan, commonly for three or five years upfront. Some customers may not utilize all the features included in the product, and this can lead to them paying for functionalities they don't need."

"The license is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

21%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Data Center Network Manager?

The tool is always expensive, but their service, product quality, and support are good. We're happy with it, but it's still an expensive solution. There are cheaper alternatives but no similar plat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Data Center Network Manager?

I do not believe it integrated well with different infrastructures for hybrid environments. I am uncertain because we have never attempted that in our environment, so they could perform better in t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Data Center Network Manager?

The main use case for URL filtering with PAN-DB is that it performs quite well. Earlier, when I started in 2012, there was a Blue Coat product available during that period. I am not certain whether...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco DNA Center vs Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)

Compared 14% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)

Compared 12% of the time

Arista Data ANalyZer vs Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager vs Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)

Compared 11% of the time

Zabbix vs Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)

Compared 10% of the time

More Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) Competitors

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 27% of the time

LiveNX vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 15% of the time

DX NetOps vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 15% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 14% of the time

ObserverLIVE vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 14% of the time

More InfoVista VistaInsight Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)

May 2026

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) report

Download Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2026

Download InfoVista VistaInsight product report

Also Known As

Cisco Data Center Network Manager

VistaInsight

Overview

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller, formerly DCNM, provides a consolidated dashboard offering insights into network operations, real-time telemetry, and automation capabilities. Users noted enhanced data center management and seamless SD-WAN integration.

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller integrates Python, Ansible, and Terraform for efficient traffic management. Comprehensive data center insight and stability highlight its utility across policy updates and network troubleshooting. With support for hybrid environments and enhanced network health data visibility, the platform suits complex, evolving infrastructures.

What are the Key Features?

Automation Capabilities: Simplifies network operations with automated workflows and scheduling.
Programming Support: Facilitates integration through Python, Ansible, and Terraform compatibility.
Comprehensive Dashboard: Provides a centralized view of network performance and health.
Real-Time Telemetry: Enhances decision-making with up-to-the-moment data.
SD-WAN Integration: Ensures seamless traffic flow across network borders.

What Benefits Should Users Look for?

Enhanced Network Monitoring: Allows precise tracking and troubleshooting of network issues.
Efficient Resource Management: Streamlines policy updates and component management.
Improved Security: Facilitates tighter control over Nexus switch configurations.
Centralized Management: Reduces complexity in maintaining data centers through a unified interface.

In data center operations, businesses leverage Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller for improved security, tackling tasks like VPN operations and private cloud development. It enhances storage management, providing robust support to manage Nexus switches for optimized component oversight and security protocols.

Cisco

InfoVista VistaInsight provides network performance monitoring with comprehensive capabilities for enterprises. It ensures efficient management and optimization of network resources, delivering insights that enhance operational efficiency.

InfoVista VistaInsight offers advanced analytics and reporting to help businesses optimize their networks. Designed for IT professionals, it enables proactive monitoring and detailed reports tailored to different industry needs. Flexible and scalable, it supports effective network management, contributing to improved customer satisfaction and reduced downtime. Organizations benefit from real-time visibility into system performance, facilitating strategic decision-making and resource allocation.

What are the key features of InfoVista VistaInsight?

Performance Analytics: Provides detailed performance data for both local and global networks, ensuring better decision-making.
Scalability: Adapts to growing network demands, supporting efficient management as organizations expand.
Custom Reporting: Offers customizable reports to fit specific requirements, enhancing actionable insights.
Real-Time Monitoring: Delivers instant visibility into network status, allowing for quick response to any issues.
Automation Capabilities: Increases efficiency through automation, reducing manual intervention and errors.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Operational Efficiency: Increases efficiency by streamlining network operations, reducing complexity and costs.
Resource Optimization: Helps better allocate resources, maximizing output and minimizing wastage.
Downtime Reduction: Minimizes downtime through proactive issue identification, ensuring continuous operations.
Strategic Decision-Making: Enhances decisions with accurate, timely data, improving overall strategic outcomes.
Customer Satisfaction: Improves user experience by maintaining high network performance standards.

InfoVista VistaInsight is used in telecommunications, financial services, and healthcare industries to monitor and optimize network performance. In telecommunications, it ensures seamless service delivery, while in finance, it protects transaction integrity. Healthcare providers use it to maintain critical service reliability, enhancing patient care.

Infovista

Sample Customers

Banco de Guayaquil, Cox Communications, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Roper St. Francis, University of British Columbia

Ooredoo Tunisia

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, SolarWinds and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.