Cisco ACI vs Symantec Data Center Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
7,113 views|1,356 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
727 views|606 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco ACI and Symantec Data Center Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud and Data Center Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco ACI vs. Symantec Data Center Security Report (Updated: March 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features include microsegmentation, L3 Out features, and the common tenant and tenancy model.""The best part of ACI is that it can integrate with a lot of virtual environments like VMware, Hyper-V, and KVM.""The ability to integrate with other systems is the most valuable feature.""We can support policy based on our intent, then that gets rendered into the policy that we will be using for Fabric.""What's most valuable in Cisco ACI is that it isn't like the legacy infrastructure where you have a lot of complexity in a TTR architecture. What I like most about Cisco ACI is that you can control those devices from a single console, even if you have three hundred devices. You can manage the entire infrastructure from a single point of contact, so Cisco ACI is a time saver. Another exclusive feature of Cisco ACI is its API interface that lets you enhance automation within the environment. You can manage your entire data center from a single interface through Cisco ACI. If you want to upgrade three hundred devices in one click, you can do that, and within one hour, all three hundred devices will be upgraded. I also like that Cisco keeps enhancing the product by adding different features, so there have been five major releases of Cisco ACI. Another valuable feature of the solution is that it's more user-friendly than Aruba and Juniper.""The centralized management of the entire network data center, in this case with ACI, is the most valuable feature. By having access to some powerful APIs you can build your own tool to speak to the ACI controller, then with that, you can deploy things really fast. Having the option to build your own tools and then using the centralized management of the ACI to push the configuration to the network devices is very valuable.""The biggest benefit has been that it has improved communication between my endpoints in the data center.""I have found the SDN features to be the most valuable."

More Cisco ACI Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the endpoint protection system.""The advantage of Data Center Security is its ease of use and that it serves as a single unified platform, where I can apply all my security policies to protect that server.""The console and tools are very user-friendly.""The granularity of applying the policies is valuable.""The most valuable feature is the centralized console, which can handle different products that we have.""The ability to finely control permissions and restrictions on servers or assets through a customizable rule set is a key strength.""We use the product to prevent unauthorized access to data, systems, and servers. It provides essential features for data center security.""Good file integrity monitoring features."

More Symantec Data Center Security Pros →

Cons
"The additional features I would like to see included in the next releases are support for our policy-based routing. There are endpoint issues that are there now in the code. Hopefully, these will get fixed in the future code.""Cisco ACI would benefit by providing the option to integrate easily with DNAC in their next release.""We're still in the process of doing the migration. We haven't migrated completely all of our applications out of our legacy into it yet. It was challenging at first, but getting easier now that we're starting to get into it.""I would like this solution to be integrated with Pure Storage.""I would like for there to be more information about it available. While using the ACI in the graphical interface, I would like if there was something that explained every step that you can click and it will tell you what you are doing in more detail.""We have had two calls with technical support. They are not the best. We opened a case to diagnose issues and it's taken weeks to get someone on the case and to move forward.""ACI's blade servers could be more flexible, and its storage interface is a little too complex because they use some third-party storage solution.""The user interface should be made easier."

More Cisco ACI Cons →

"The product blocks certain processes, even after allowlisting them.""This solution clashes with Microsoft defender, which results in performance degradation on the machine.""Adding more compatibility with common products like Microsoft would be a plus.""Agent management is a challenging task.""It would be advantageous if Symantec or Broadcom, given the rebranding, could simplify the process, enabling users to leverage the antivirus functionality more easily.""A user or administrator making the policy in the DCS should have a very thorough knowledge of the operating system or policy making. You have to be very specific about the data structure.""There is plenty of room for improvement with this product, and it could start with platform metrics.""The support is very bad. They're not fast at all. Trend Micro's support is much better."

More Symantec Data Center Security Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is pretty good for new technology."
  • "It saves time and resources."
  • "The price could be improved. It is expensive, but then again, it is Cisco. The price is worth what you pay for."
  • "We have seen time improvement using the product."
  • "The thing that I like the most from Cisco is the support and all the documentation that they have. We do have to pay for it though."
  • "We bought a package for hardware, software, and support. At that time, Cisco was simply selling that package to distributors, then we opted for it directly."
  • "We used Cisco Professional Services for the deployment. They were outstanding, but very expensive."
  • "Price is always an issue."
  • More Cisco ACI Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Compared to some other solutions, such as CrowdStrike, Symantec is more expensive."
  • "The product is a bit costly."
  • "It is notably more expensive when compared to other solutions."
  • More Symantec Data Center Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud and Data Center Security solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:There are some very major differences between both the Products and to name a few -Cisco ACI have physical network gear (9K Switches) where the Code runs in ACI Policy Mode & the UCS server where… more »
    Top Answer:Once you know your way around the Cisco ecosystem, using Cisco ACI is not so difficult. It is a global product, so when you change one interface, changes are automatically reflected on every switch… more »
    Top Answer:The flexibility of adding new components with minimal impact on existing services running in the data center is a key benefit of this ACI-based solution.
    Top Answer:The granularity of applying the policies is valuable.
    Top Answer:Agent management is a challenging task. We cannot do it from the console. We will have to use other tools.
    Top Answer:One key use case for data center security is protecting files within the data center. This is especially important for Linux systems, where locking down specific files is essential to prevent… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    7,113
    Comparisons
    1,356
    Reviews
    19
    Average Words per Review
    444
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    727
    Comparisons
    606
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    679
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    Cisco Application-Centric Infrastructure (ACI) reduces TCO, automates IT tasks, and accelerates data center application deployments. It accomplishes this using a business-relevant Software Defined Networking (SDN) policy model across networks, servers, storage, security, and services.

    Docker containers make it easy to develop, deploy, and deliver applications where containers can be deployed and brought down in a matter of seconds. This flexibility makes it very useful for DevOps to automate deployment of containers. Symantec Data Center Security: Server Advanced provides agentless Docker container protection that allows you to achieve the performance benefits of Docker without sacrificing security. Full application control enables administrator privilege de-escalation, patch mitigation, and protection against zero day threats in today's heterogeneous data centers.

    Sample Customers
    Bowling Green State University, du, Qatar University
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco ACI vs. Symantec Data Center Security
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco ACI vs. Symantec Data Center Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco ACI is ranked 2nd in Cloud and Data Center Security with 96 reviews while Symantec Data Center Security is ranked 12th in Cloud and Data Center Security with 11 reviews. Cisco ACI is rated 8.0, while Symantec Data Center Security is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cisco ACI writes "Stable, easy to extend, scalable, and has a host-based routing feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Data Center Security writes "A robust solution that provides comprehensive protection for data centers, offering agentless security, powerful intrusion prevention, and a wide range of security features". Cisco ACI is most compared with VMware NSX, Cisco Secure Workload, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Nuage Networks and Juniper Contrail Networking, whereas Symantec Data Center Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Symantec Endpoint Security, VMware NSX, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation and Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes. See our Cisco ACI vs. Symantec Data Center Security report.

    See our list of best Cloud and Data Center Security vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.