We performed a comparison between Cisco ACI and Sangfor aBOS [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Cisco, Masergy and others in Network Virtualization.
Earn 20 points
In reality, branch offices face IT obstacles such as lack of specialized IT personnel and physical space and power resources needed to support traditional datacenter platforms. They expect to be more productive to meet the increasing business needs; they want to be able to quickly set up a light data center and achieve rapid gateway deployment in order to fulfill requirements like securing operating systems, providing fast access and enabling remote office, etc. Sangfor aBOS (the Mini HCI) is specifically designed to cater to this demand. With virtualization technology, it only takes one server to provide Network Function Virtualization (NFV), virtual switch, virtual router and other virtual services through a unified management platform for resource allocation. Inheriting Sangfor’s strength in security and optimization, NFV allows users to deploy vIAM, vAF, vWANO, vSSL and etc. according to their needs.
Cisco ACI is ranked 2nd in Network Virtualization with 23 reviews while Sangfor aBOS [EOL] is ranked 5th in Network Virtualization. Cisco ACI is rated 8.2, while Sangfor aBOS [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco ACI writes "Flexible, scalable, and allows you to manage an entire data center from a single interface". On the other hand, Cisco ACI is most compared with VMware NSX, Nuage Networks and Cisco Enterprise Network Functions Virtualization, whereas Sangfor aBOS [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Network Virtualization vendors.
We monitor all Network Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.