Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Checkmarx SAST vs Cyber Chief comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx SAST
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
22nd
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cyber Chief
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
73rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx SAST is 1.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cyber Chief is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Cuneyt KALPAKOGLU Phd. - PeerSpot reviewer
Identifying code vulnerabilities swiftly with no need to complete the coding and offers good security
The primary use case of Checkmarx SAST is application security, specifically static application security testing. It is essential and the root of this concept I did not find measurable information about the financial benefits or return on investment. The most important competitive advantage and…
Use Cyber Chief?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
862,543 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx SAST?
We were users in a small country, and we paid one consolidated bill for all the tools, so I don't know the specific amount for Checkmarx.
What needs improvement with Checkmarx SAST?
We had some issues where Checkmarx did not recognize a vulnerability. We had to talk with the vendor, and they had to include an improvement in the tool to resolve this issue.
What is your primary use case for Checkmarx SAST?
We integrated Checkmarx with our pipelines in Jenkins. We had it fully automated for static security scanning to protect our company against attacks.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

SAST
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
1. Aetna 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. AIG 5. Airbus 6. Akamai 7. Alibaba 8. Allianz 9. Amazon 10. American Express 11. Aon 12. Apple 13. AT&T 14. Autodesk 15. Bank of America 16. Barclays 17. Bayer 18. Berkshire Hathaway 19. BlackRock 20. Boeing 21. BNP Paribas 22. Cisco 23. Coca-Cola 24. Comcast 25. Credit Suisse 26. CVS Health 27. Dell 28. Deutsche Bank 29. eBay 30. ExxonMobil 31. FedEx 32. Ford 33. General Electric 34. General Motors 35. Google 36. Goldman Sachs 37. Home Depot 38. IBM 39. Intel 40. JPMorgan Chase 41. Kraft Heinz 42. L'Oréal 43. Mastercard 44. McDonald's 45. Merck 46. Microsoft 47. Morgan Stanley 48. Nike 49. Oracle 50. Pfizer 51. Procter & Gamble 52. Prudential Financial 53. Qualcomm 54. Rakuten
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: July 2025.
862,543 professionals have used our research since 2012.