Checkmarx One vs Red Canary comparison

Checkmarx and Red Canary are both solutions in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category. Checkmarx is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1, while Red Canary is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Canary users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Checkmarx One and Red Canary are top contenders in cybersecurity, each bringing significant advantages to the table. While Checkmarx One has a clear edge in pricing and support, Red Canary is noted for its comprehensive features, making it a more substantial investment option despite the higher cost.

Features: Checkmarx One delivers robust application security with static and dynamic vulnerability assessments and integrates effectively with existing software development processes, allowing for easy identification of code vulnerabilities. Red Canary excels in endpoint detection and response, enabling continuous monitoring and real-time threat mitigation, and provides advanced threat detection capabilities, ensuring superior threat intelligence.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could benefit from enhancing its threat intelligence capabilities and expanding its integration with more third-party tools to provide a more comprehensive security solution. Additionally, improving the speed and comprehensiveness of threat detection features would enhance its overall utility. Red Canary, while strong in detection, could improve its pricing structure and initial setup complexity. Providing more flexible deployment options could also enhance its user experience and overall adoption rate.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One is praised for its easy deployment process that integrates seamlessly within existing workflows, complemented by responsive customer support, which allows businesses to maintain focus on development without security disruptions. Red Canary, although more complex during the initial setup phase, offers exceptional onboarding support and reliable customer service, which helps users navigate its extensive features effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One provides competitive pricing models, offering significant ROI due to its cost-effective security management features, making it ideal for organizations looking for both affordability and security strength. Red Canary, while having a higher initial investment, offers value through its advanced features and long-term security assurances, justifying the cost with enhanced threat detection capabilities and its alignment with its security focus, albeit at a premium rate.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Red Canary Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Red Canary

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

Syed Hasan

Specialist Leader at Deloitte

Partner experiences excellent technical support and seamless initial setup

In my opinion, if we are able to extract or show the report, and because everything is going towards agent tech and GenAI, it would be beneficial if it could get integrated with our code base and do the fix automatically. It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from. This would be really helpful.

Read full review

Sagar Shekhar

Cyber Security Analyst at TIAA

An open-source tool that offers great automation capabilities

Red Canary MDR generates a lot of output, so it would be good if, in the end, it generates a summary of all the previous attacks and what was the outcome of a single attack, especially so that it becomes easy for the user to see the summary and analyze the whole thing. In general, the solution currently fails to provide a summary to its users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"Helps us check vulnerabilities in our SAP Fiori application."

"The only thing I like is that Checkmarx does not need to compile."

"The most valuable features are the easy to understand interface, and it 's very user-friendly."

"The reports are very good because they include details on the code level, and make suggestions about how to fix the problems."

"The solution improved the efficiency of our code security reviews. It helps tremendously because it finds hundreds of potential problems sometimes."

"The setup is very easy. There is a lot of information in the documents which makes the install not difficult at all."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are difficult to pinpoint because of the way the functionalities and the features are intertwined, it's difficult to say which part of them I prefer most. You initiate the scan, you have a scan, you have the review set, and reporting, they all work together as one whole process. It's not like accounting software, where you have the different features, et cetera."

"Our static operation security has been able to identify more security issues since implementing this solution."

More Checkmarx One pros

"I recommended Red Canary to my friends who work in other organizations."

"The solution works well for what we use it for and the support and protection are good."

"The valuable features of this solution are it integrates well with different EDR software, such CrowdStrike, and Carbon Black, and the information it provides is helpful."

"The near real-time review translates into near real-time action. So, in addition to alerting, Red Canary MDR has response playbooks built out."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its automation part."

Cons

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

"Some of the descriptions were found to be missing or were not as elaborate as compared to other descriptions. Although, they could be found across various standard sources but it would save a lot of time for developers, if this was fixed."

"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."

"Meta data is always needed."

"The reports are good, but they still need to be improved considering what the UI offers."

"Creating and editing custom rules in Checkmarx is difficult because the license for the editor comes at an additional cost, and there is a steep learning curve."

"The Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) feature should be better."

"We can run only one project at a time."

"Checkmarx needs improvement in its Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and API security features."

More Checkmarx One cons

"The most valuable feature of Red Canary MDR is the overall threat protection it provides."

"The price could always be better."

"In general, the solution currently fails to provide a summary to its users."

"Red Canary's pricing spectrum may not be ideal for smaller financial institutions."

"I would like there to be an on-premise version of this solution for our data centers because of the proliferation of online threats."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."

"The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"It is an expensive solution."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"The solution could vary in price depending on how many endpoints a company has."

"Red Canary MDR I use is an open-source tool."

"I have not compared Red Canary to other solutions to know if the price is high or low. However, I have found the price of this solution fair and reasonable, it cost approximately $100 per year, per device. If they could provide the solution for $50 per year, per device, it would be better."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

The current pricing of Zafran Security is fair overall. They were good to work with to accommodate our organization w...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvement...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

Zafran Security is helping reduce the amount of critical vulnerabilities in our environments that require prompt reme...

See all answers

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Canary MDR?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its automation part.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Canary MDR?

The services are higher priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Canary MDR?

Red Canary's pricing spectrum may not be ideal for smaller financial institutions.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 41% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 17% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Zafran Security

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Zafran Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 36% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Red Canary

Compared 19% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Red Canary

Compared 18% of the time

Expel vs Red Canary

Compared 14% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Red Canary

Compared 11% of the time

Rapid7 MDR vs Red Canary

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Canary Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

June 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

June 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

May 2025

Download Red Canary product report

Also Known As

No data available

Red Canary Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

Red Canary Managed Detection and Response (MDR) offers robust threat detection, rapid response capabilities, continuous security monitoring, and seamless integration with existing tools. Valued for its actionable reporting and proactive threat intelligence, it streamlines operations and enhances organizational efficiency and security.

Red Canary

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

DuPont, Quanta Services, Microchip Technology, Hopkins Public Schools, Henny Penny, Schumacher Homes

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Red Canary

June 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Red Canary

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Red Canary and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Red Canary report.

See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.