Checkmarx One vs Red Canary comparison

Checkmarx and Red Canary are both solutions in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category. Checkmarx is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2, while Red Canary is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.0. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Canary users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Checkmarx One and Red Canary are top contenders in cybersecurity, each bringing significant advantages to the table. While Checkmarx One has a clear edge in pricing and support, Red Canary is noted for its comprehensive features, making it a more substantial investment option despite the higher cost.

Features: Checkmarx One delivers robust application security with static and dynamic vulnerability assessments and integrates effectively with existing software development processes, allowing for easy identification of code vulnerabilities. Red Canary excels in endpoint detection and response, enabling continuous monitoring and real-time threat mitigation, and provides advanced threat detection capabilities, ensuring superior threat intelligence.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could benefit from enhancing its threat intelligence capabilities and expanding its integration with more third-party tools to provide a more comprehensive security solution. Additionally, improving the speed and comprehensiveness of threat detection features would enhance its overall utility. Red Canary, while strong in detection, could improve its pricing structure and initial setup complexity. Providing more flexible deployment options could also enhance its user experience and overall adoption rate.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One is praised for its easy deployment process that integrates seamlessly within existing workflows, complemented by responsive customer support, which allows businesses to maintain focus on development without security disruptions. Red Canary, although more complex during the initial setup phase, offers exceptional onboarding support and reliable customer service, which helps users navigate its extensive features effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One provides competitive pricing models, offering significant ROI due to its cost-effective security management features, making it ideal for organizations looking for both affordability and security strength. Red Canary, while having a higher initial investment, offers value through its advanced features and long-term security assurances, justifying the cost with enhanced threat detection capabilities and its alignment with its security focus, albeit at a premium rate.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Red Canary Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Red Canary

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Featured Reviews

Reviewer6233

Works at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal

While Zafran Security is already a powerful tool, there are areas where it could be further improved to provide even greater value. One key area for enhancement is the searching capabilities within its vulnerabilities module. By incorporating the ability to create Boolean searches, users would gain the ability to apply more complex filters and customize their search criteria. This would greatly enhance the precision and efficiency with which security teams can identify and prioritize vulnerabilities. Having such tailored search capabilities would save time and resources by narrowing down vast lists of vulnerabilities to those that meet specific parameters relevant to our unique risk environment. Additionally, integrating more robust reporting and visualization tools would be advantageous. Enhanced dashboards that offer customizable visual representations of risk configurations and threat landscapes would facilitate better communication with stakeholders, making it easier to explain vulnerabilities and the rationale behind certain security measures. This would also aid in demonstrating the improvements and value derived from existing security investments to leadership and non-technical team members.

Read full review

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Shubham Biradar

SOC Analyst at Valorant

Monitors traffic effectively and assists in compliance decision-making for quick response

Red Canary detects threats and attack patterns, allowing us to assess any significant damage caused to the banking environment, particularly if protected data has been damaged or corrupted. It is valuable for security teams in banking industries that need to make informed decisions quickly. Red Canary solutions are useful for compliance with standards like FFIEC and PCI and are employed in medical operations for HIPAA compliance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"With Zafran Security, it integrates with your security controls, allowing you to take that risk score and reduce it based on the controls in place or increase the risk based on different factors, such as if the issue is internet reachable or if there's an exploit in the wild."

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"The most valuable feature is the simple user interface."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the automation and information that it provides in the reports."

"The solution is always updating to continuously add items that create a level of safety from vulnerabilities. It's one of the key features they provide that's an excellent selling point. They're always ahead of the game when it comes to finding any vulnerabilities within the database."

"Less false positive errors as compared to any other solution."

"The UI is very intuitive and simple to use."

"The process of remediating software security vulnerabilities can now be performed (ongoing) as portions of the application are being built in advance of being compiled."

"The report function is the solution's greatest asset."

"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things. It also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The solution works well for what we use it for and the support and protection are good."

"The near real-time review translates into near real-time action. So, in addition to alerting, Red Canary MDR has response playbooks built out."

"I recommended Red Canary to my friends who work in other organizations."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its automation part."

"The valuable features of this solution are it integrates well with different EDR software, such CrowdStrike, and Carbon Black, and the information it provides is helpful."

Cons

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"The validation process needs to be sped up."

"Micro-services need to be included in the next release."

"There are some downtimes when Checkmarx One is being upgraded to the latest version or some improvement is there."

"The reports are good, but they still need to be improved considering what the UI offers."

"You can't use it in the continuous delivery pipeline because the scanning takes too much time."

"The product can be improved by continuing to expand the application languages and frameworks that can be scanned for vulnerabilities. This includes expanded coverage for mobile applications as well as open-source development tools."

"I really would like to integrate it as a service along with the SAP HANA Cloud Platform. It will then be easy to use it directly as a service."

"I expect application security vendors to cover all aspects of application security, including SAST, DAST, and even mobile application security testing. And it would be much better if they provided an on-premises and cloud option for all these main application security features."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Red Canary's pricing spectrum may not be ideal for smaller financial institutions."

"The price could always be better."

"In general, the solution currently fails to provide a summary to its users."

"I would like there to be an on-premise version of this solution for our data centers because of the proliferation of online threats."

"The most valuable feature of Red Canary MDR is the overall threat protection it provides."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up."

"It is the right price for quality delivery."

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."

"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"If you want more, you have to pay more. You have to pay for additional modules or functionalities."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"The solution could vary in price depending on how many endpoints a company has."

"I have not compared Red Canary to other solutions to know if the price is high or low. However, I have found the price of this solution fair and reasonable, it cost approximately $100 per year, per device. If they could provide the solution for $50 per year, per device, it would be better."

"Red Canary MDR I use is an open-source tool."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

Since we stood Zafran Security up in our private cloud, we handle the maintenance on our side. As we opted not to use...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

In terms of areas for improvement, Zafran Security is doing a really great job as a new and emerging company. Oftenti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

My use cases for Zafran Security revolve around two primary areas. One is around vulnerability management and priorit...

See all answers

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Canary MDR?

The services are higher priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Canary MDR?

Red Canary's pricing spectrum may not be ideal for smaller financial institutions.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Canary MDR?

We use Red Canary ( /products/red-canary-reviews ) to monitor incoming and outgoing traffic. For example, when we rec...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 24% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Zafran Security

Compared 10% of the time

Nucleus vs Zafran Security

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Zafran Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 48% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Expel vs Red Canary

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Red Canary

Compared 8% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Red Canary

Compared 8% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Red Canary

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Vigilance vs Red Canary

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Canary Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Zafran Security

January 2026

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

January 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

December 2025

Download Red Canary product report

Also Known As

No data available

Red Canary Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

Red Canary Managed Detection and Response (MDR) offers robust threat detection, rapid response capabilities, continuous security monitoring, and seamless integration with existing tools. Valued for its actionable reporting and proactive threat intelligence, it streamlines operations and enhances organizational efficiency and security.

Red Canary

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

DuPont, Quanta Services, Microchip Technology, Hopkins Public Schools, Henny Penny, Schumacher Homes

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Red Canary

December 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Red Canary

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Red Canary and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Red Canary report.

See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.